ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

1015 Words5 Pages

Andrew Jackson Did Not Advance Democracy Andrew Jackson once stood as the United States seventh president. However, he did not just get this job handed to him. When he was a child, Andrew Jackson did not have the same affluence as other presidents. He was an orphan when he was young, living in a cabin. Without any money or support, Jackson had to work to gain a high position. He rose through the ranks to a more esteemed position as a general in the War of 1812. As a result, Jackson earned a reputation as a war hero for beating the British in New Orleans. Jackson won the election in 1828 because people believed he was a man for the people and very democratic. Andrew Jackson may have seemed like a democratic candidate at the surface, but his …show more content…

This act allowed states to remove Native Americans from places east of the Mississippi River. Jackson supported this act because he wanted to make more land available for American farmers. Only because of Andrew Jackson did congress approve the removal. For instance, “Under pressure from Jackson, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830” (“RCE”). Congress clearly passed the law as a result of the pressure Jackson applied to them. Jackson’s support for the removal of Native Americans demonstrates how he was not truly very democratic. Jackson believed that the people ought to constantly have a say in how the government makes decisions. However, the removal of Native Americans without any consent indicates how this may not have been entirely his intention. Even though Andrew Jackson performed this service for Americans, there were numerous alternative ways he could have carried it out. The Indian Removal act was not the only way that Jackson showed his anti-democratic views, the way he used the spoils system also demonstrated the opposite of …show more content…

Georgia case is another occurrence where Andrew Jackson failed to advance democracy. The Cherokee, in collaboration with Worcester, created this legal dispute as a means of defense. According to the Cherokee, Georgia should not have any power over them because they are an independent nation. The Cherokee were friends with Worcester, who supported their right to remain. Aside from that, Worcester was a white man who resisted orders to leave the Cherokee land. In court, they ruled that Georgia was not allowed to do anything to the Cherokees because they were declared to be a separate nation. However, this ruling did not let them off so easily. According to “HMH”, it reads, “Georgia, however, ignored the Court’s ruling, and President Jackson’s response was to take no action to make Georgia follow the ruling. “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it,” Jackson supposedly said” (“RCE”). This confirms that Jackson had no intention of pushing Georgia to follow the ruling. However, it can be seen as if he supported it. Because he disregarded the presidential oath to obey the law, this can be perceived as being

Show More
Related
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

One of many atrocities that Jackson committed was the forceful removal of thousands of Indians and the subsequent death of many of them. Although his reasoning, as is stated in his Message to Congress "On Indian Removal," was

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

This removal led to many deaths and the erosion of Native American practices in the United States. Jackson was not the only one interested in the land the Native Americans

Read More
178 Words | 1 Pages

Indian Removal policy The Indian removal act is the act called for the government to negotiate treaties that would make the Native Americans to relocate west. Andrew Jackson had supported a law of moving all the Native Americans to the West of the Mississippi. Andrew Jackson thought that the government had the right to regulate where Native Americans Were allowed to live. To solve this problem Andrew Jackson asked the Congress to make a Law that would make Native Americans either move west or to submit to state laws.(Jackson's Removal Policy) Andrew Jackson grew up really hating the Indians and grew up having the skull of Indians.

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

The government had been acquiring native land through cessions from as early as the 1720s (Document A). These land treaties had been a common occurrence for over a century. Jackson was no different in that sense, as the Indian Removal Act was seemingly rooted in the same motivations for expansion as the settlers that came before him. Furthermore, the majority of Americans during and leading up to the Indian Removal Act shared the same view of the Indians’ future as inhabitants of the United States. Most leaders of the country agreed that the Indians should be moved westward, so the territories in the Southeast could be further developed (Foner 280).

Read More
1744 Words | 7 Pages

Early in Jacksons administration he passed the Indian Removal Act (1830) which gave the government funding to remove the ‘Five Civilised Tribes’ which included the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole Indians – a total of nearly 60,000. The act authorised the relocation of the tribes previously situated to the east of the Mississippi river to the west. The act didn’t allow the forced removal of the tribes but it allowed Jackson to negotiate with the tribes for their land which he did and led to their removal. This was made worse as the tribes unlike the other Indian tribes had done all they could to integrate into American society. For example, the Cherokee tribe created their own written language which set a precedent for Indians, they established education for their children, and even created a constitution which they had to adhere to.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

First, The indian removal act was to move the indian tribes that were occupying land onto western reservations. The indian tribes tried to go to court to fight against the act using the government. The supreme court agreed with the indians, that they did not have to move, but President Jackson made them move anyway because he believed that the supreme court could not support its ruling. President Jackson went against the Supreme Court so that he could sell the land for more money after the indians were relocated. The evidence in this paragraph was taken from the document “President Jackson and Indian Removal.”

Read More
561 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson was the 7th president of the United States of America. He won the election of 1828 by a landslide but, this was not a good thing. Jackson created the Spoil system. A system where he allowed his friends and supporters to work in office with him instead of qualified government individuals. He wanted to increase white man’s suffrage and make the common man more important to everyday life.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

As president Jackson had many plans for the United States. He founded the Democratic Party and supported the country with his individual liberty. That’s the bright side of what he has done, but on the darker side he has passed a law that would remove the Natives from their land. Gold was also found within Cherokee territory and that gave more reason to the greed thirsty Americans to remove the Natives from their land.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson Did Not Advance the Cause of Democracy Andrew Jackson served as the 7th president of the United States of America. He was known as a common man and a war hero, though it was not easy making his way up. When he was younger, Andrew Jackson lived in a cabin and became an orphan at a young age. He taught himself law and became successful. Before he was the president, he worked with the senate and was Tennessee's first representative for the U.S. Congress.

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

Jackson enforced a Indian removal act to fund the removal of tribes. With this act, Jackson wanted the Indians moved from American territory into Indian Territory.

Read More
359 Words | 2 Pages

One of the most significant criticisms of Andrew Jackson's and his treatment of the Native americans. Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which forced thousands of Native Americans from their industrial lands in the Southeast to reserve in Oklahoma. This act

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

They forced the American Indians to follow their state laws since they lived within the state boundaries. Because of this, the Cherokees believed they were being denied their basic human rights listed under the United States Constitution, which led to conflicts. President Andrew Jackson stated that the solution to these conflicts was for the American Indians to move or become a part of the states. Andrew Jackson insisted that Congress pass the Indian

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson disobeyed a direct order from the Supreme Court, which it means he was above the law. I really wonder how Americans tolerated him, at that time, he was cruel to the Indian common man. Because of him, the Native Americans have the worst end of the Trail of Tears. They are the ones who are forced out of their traditional homes and sent away on a journey of pain and death. Those who had fallen ill, most of the time died, and those who had the will to move on were able to make it to the end and start new lives.

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

He saw the policy of Indian removal as necessary to promote American economic growth and security. Jackson's attitude towards Native Americans was controversial, and he was known for his harsh policies towards them. He believed that they were inferior to whites and viewed their assimilation into American society as impossible. He famously defied a Supreme Court ruling that favored the Cherokee Nation's right to remain on their lands in Georgia and pushed forward with their forced removal. Jackson's role in the Indian Removal and his attitudes towards Native Americans have been the subject of ongoing debate and criticism by historians and scholars, with some viewing him as a champion of American democracy and others as a symbol of America's treatment of Native Americans.

Read More

More about Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

Open Document