ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson Indian Removal Act Analysis

401 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Did the indian removal act have and intended impact

This first seminar was successful due to the insightful comments and output every person brought when conveying our thoughts on Jackson’s actions and the Indian Removal Act. The inception of the seminar began with Maria straight out stating how Andrew Jackson was to blame and he het congress enact the bill. This was the center of our conversation for a good 15 minutes before we switched to examine why Andrew Jackson may have been forced and obligated to enact the Indian Removal Act. Sam discussed how Andrew Jackson had to “ultimately choose,” between his own citizens and the Native Americans. And he was not the only one that wanted this Act, but a majority in congress supported it, which is the reason it passed. I brought up the idea that maybe this was a form of revenge by the American people for the resistance that the Native’s put up during the War of 1812. But, Matt made the argument that if this was done as a …show more content…

But, my argument revolved around the question, why did Andrew Jackson wish to addresses this problem towards the end of his presidency? Why did he leave President Martian Van Buren in such difficult conundrums, which lead his political career to be criticized very heavily? Finally, as the period was coming to an end, the final connection that was drawn was between the rhetoric of the Indian Removal Act and the rhetoric that revolves around major world issues today such as ISIS and the Syrian Refugee Crisis. The fleeing refuses are not allowed entry into our nation because many key political figures are expressing how they are “part of ISIS,” and will lead America to its knees. This mimics the way the white settlers in the southern states portrayed the Native Americans, who stated how “uncivilized,” they were. Controversial issues such as this one really shows the insight my fellow peers have and the ideology they

Show More
Related
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More
1501 Words | 7 Pages

Native Americans who emigrated from Europe perceived the Indians as a friendly society with whom they dwelt with in harmony. While Native Americans were largely intensive agriculturalists and entrepreneurial in nature, the Indians were hunters and gatherers who earned a livelihood predominantly as nomads. By the 19th century, irrefutable territories i.e. the areas around River Mississippi were under exclusive occupation by the Indians. At the time, different Indian tribes such as the Chickasaws, Creeks, and Cherokees had adapted a sedentary lifestyle and practiced small-scale agriculture. According to the proponents of removal, the Indians were to move westwards into forested lands in order to generate additional space for development through agricultural production (Memorial of the Cherokee Indians).

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States of America, was elected to presidency in the country’s 1828 elections. It was however on June 28, 1830, that Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act and in turn, allowed the relocation of Indians in areas far from the white settlements. The new law gave Jackson power to provide the voluntary relocation of Indians to the trans-Mississippi West. In “Andrew Jackson and His Indian Wars” Remini gives insight in the relationship Jackson had with the Native Americans. Whilst Jackson is portrayed as a slave owner and racist, Remini explains the man’s logic with regard to the hierarchy of men in the United States.

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

government’s main goal was to displace them from their lands for the sole profit and benefit of the American people. This notion was achieved upon the Indian Removal Act of 1830, issued by President Andrew Jackson himself. Jackson admitted that though the general policy was to civilize the Natives, the government was also keen to “purchase their lands and thrust them farther into the wilderness” (Doc 4). The wilderness, in this case, would be the designated Indian Territory west of Missouri and the Arkansas Territory (Doc 7). This territory was leagues away from the various tribes’ homelands, one tribe even being removed from the southern tip of Florida.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Reading Analysis Essay In the journal, Mobilizing Women, Anticipating Abolition: The Struggle Against Indian Removal in the 1830s, the author Mary Hershberger describes the unprecedented acts of benevolent women participating in abolishment of the removal of Indians introduced by President Andrew Jackson. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830 coercing Cherokee Indians to move beyond of the Mississippi River. The failure of the attempt of abolishing the removal of the Indians, the experience gave way to the support of other campaigns. President Jackson wholeheartedly favored the removal of the Cherokees west of the Mississippi.

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

The relocation of the Native Americans also called the Indian Removal act was signed by Andrew Jackson. He believed that this act protected the Natives and also protected their culture from the white settlers, “Surrounded by the whites with their arts of civilization, which, by destroying the resources of the savage, doom him to weakness and decay, the fate of the Mohegan, the Narragiansett, and the Delaware is fast overtaking the Choctaw, the Cherokee, and the Creek. That this fate surely awaits them if they remain within the limits of the states does not admit of a doubt.” (Andrew Jackson, page 282). He also made the relocation voluntary for the Natives as it was unjust for them to leave their land which had their ancestral values, “This emigration should be voluntary, for it would be as cruel as unjust to compel the aborigines to abandon the graves of their fathers and seek a home in a distant land.”

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were

Read More
1308 Words | 6 Pages

As a part of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, Native American people were forcefully assembled and made to endure one of the longest walks from Georgia to Oklahoma on what has become known as the Trail of Tears. President Andrew Jackson’s motives for movement of the Native people to a new territory was to eliminate the Native race by stripping the victims of their vital resources needed for basic survival. After 178 years of expansion and growth in the United States of America, the circumstances for Native Americans remain unchanged. President Jackson’s sentiments have permeated the present society in issues associated with the physical and emotional fight to decolonize. Decolonization is both the individual and communal effort to regenerate

Read More
359 Words | 2 Pages

One of the most significant criticisms of Andrew Jackson's and his treatment of the Native americans. Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which forced thousands of Native Americans from their industrial lands in the Southeast to reserve in Oklahoma. This act

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson's Justification for Indian Removal The threat of Indians occupying American territory had become a serious issue in the United States. When Thomas Jefferson was serving his term as president, he influenced the United States government by trying to get the Indians to become "civilized." To many Americans, "civilization" meant that the Cherokees had to learn and adapt to their lifestyle.

Read More
188 Words | 1 Pages

In debating Indian Removal, Congress was discussing the dispossession and expulsion of independent Indian communities in the eastern half of North America. The debate was not a new one, but was set in terms of the principles and experience of a country with

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

On July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.

Read More
374 Words | 2 Pages

He achieved this by purposely neglecting the true horrors behind the removal of the Indians. Andrew Jackson portrayed the Native Americans as less than equal. The purpose of Jackson's speech was to justify his motives in moving the natives and to also convince congress that it was both beneficial to the Natives and the Americans. The source has value because it gives some insight into Jackson’s effort behind his motivation. Based on his purpose of speech, it can be learned that the relationship between the Natives and Americans was only beneficial for certain necessities.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

There is no doubt that the history between Native Americans and the government is one not to be proud of. It also goes to show that the United States never sat down and asked Native Americans what they wanted; if communication was conducted there would have been little conflict between the two. This overall theme is apparent in the 19th Century policy of Indian Removal and 20th Century’s Relocation and Termination policies. The main goal of the 19th Century policy of Indian Removal was to remove Native Americans from what was thought to be desired land. These policies were allowed to happen due to Native Americans being thought of as less than human.

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

During one of his powerful speeches, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said “Our nation was born in genocide when it embraced the doctrine that the original American, the Indian, was an inferior race.” Scholars talk of what happened to the Indians as a great tragedy, but never anything further. We deny what happened to the Indians, particularly the Cherokees. During the 1830’s, the United States government set out to remove all Cherokee individuals from their homes and relocate them west. Relocation meant ending up on a land foreign to them, and presented with environmental conditions that posed difficulties for human living.

Read More

More about Andrew Jackson Indian Removal Act Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document