ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson Villain Essay

511 Words3 Pages

Is Andrew Jackson a hero or villain? Andrew Jackson a man of many names, but also a man of many crimes. Andrew Jackson is a hero to most but to some like the Natives he is a villain. Jackson is a villain because he was the soul inspiration of the Trail of Tears, National Bank changes and he started the Indian Removal act The Indian Removal act started in 1830 when Jackson made it so he could grant the unsettled lands west of the mississippi river. Which he then exchanged for the indian land which was in state borders. This affected the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole. Some went peacefully but many resisted. This lead to the Trail of Tears which was a big moment in history. The Trail of tears began in 1831 as a part of Jackson’s …show more content…

The time limitation made many Congress have concerns about the concentration of the financial power in a private corp. At around 1828, the bank was run by Nicholas Biddle. In January 1832, Biddle's supporters in Congress, introduced Bank recharter legislation. Even though the charter was not due to expire for four more years, they felt that the current Congress would recharter the Bank. They felt that Jackson would not risk losing votes in Pennsylvania and other commercial states by vetoing it. But at the time Jackson's position on the Bank was not antagonistic. He was concerned about the Bank's constitutionality and the general stability of paper money in place of gold and silver. But soon after that happened Jackson started to dislike the bank even more. He started by doing strong attacks against the Bank in the press. Then Jackson vetoed the Bank Recharter Bill. Jackson also ordered the federal government's deposits removed from the Bank of the United States and placed in state or "Pet" banks. The people agreed with Jackson and he was elected into another term. Biddle then retaliated by making it more difficult for businesses and others to get the money they needed. This caused economic problems at the end of 1833 and into

Show More
Related
929 Words | 4 Pages

With these issues arising, the public became more aware of the fact that the Bank held too much power that even its advocates were unable to deny (Schlesinger 75). Jackson gave a message to Congress in 1829 that implored the legislature to recognize the unconstitutionality of the present Bank and to set reform for the Bank into motion if Congress agreed that the Bank was necessary (Remini 61). Jackson’s presentation made the president’s position clear and put the declaration of the unconstitutionality of the bank into public records. Had Biddle honestly investigated these allegations against the Bank, people would be certain of the Bank’s good intentions instead of viewing the Bank as power-hungry and unjust. Because Biddle stubbornly refused this compromise of investigation, the public became weary of the Bank’s power which Jackson would use to veto the recharter of the Bank and still maintain public

Read More
190 Words | 1 Pages

As the result, Andrew Jackson vetoed the Recharter Bill. He believed the bank held too much power, both politically and economically. Jackson also felt it was unconstitutional. He said that the bank was an exclusive

Read More
1447 Words | 6 Pages

To take away the bank's credibility that Nicholas Biddle worked so hard establish, Jackson withdrew all of the government’s deposits causing repercussions throughout the nation's economy. The issue over the national bank alone was enough to fuel another political party itself. Many were displeased by Jackson’s veto, however, Henry Clay sided with Andrew Jackson over the issue. “I believed a bank of the United States not necessary, and that a safe reliance might be placed on the local banks, in the administration of the fiscal affairs of the Government.” - Henry Clay.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

The air is heavy with the smell of gunpowder. All across the horizon is littered with bodies. The cries of children can be heard, piercing through the fog. All the carnage, this sadness carried through the breeze. This could all be stopped with one thing.

Read More
183 Words | 1 Pages

Therefore, he was against the bank of the United States (BUS). Jackson wanted to give the states the power to control the bank. In turn, those banks would give out loans to people, not knowing that they couldn't pay them back. Jackson believed that the government had too much power. He wanted to limit the government from making decisions for the people.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Point of view or perspective could differ when it comes to describing an event or a person. If we take the case of Andrew Jackson the 7th US president who is often referred to as the “people’s president” there are mixed opinions. I believe he was a president for only some of the people as lots Creeks lost their lives and land for him to succeed. So in a land where the constitution says “all men are created equal,” the Creek Indians must not have been viewed as men such if Mr. Jackson was a man for the people.

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

In the document “Jackson Battles the Bank”, it shows Jackson fighting off a monster, or the national bank, with a veto stick. Jackson was fighting to destroy the national bank. He wanted to do this because it favored the rich and not the common people. He was fighting for people to have equal rights. Instead of having no bank at all, he came up with the idea to create state banks which wouldn’t be as powerful as the National Bank.

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

One of the biggest thing that Jackson had done as a president was in 1832. Jackson vetoed a bill that would renew the second bank charter early. Jackson stated “I will kill it!”. He said this because he didn’t like the bank at all and he believed that it made the rich richer and the poor poorer. He said in his veto message “It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country and its institutions might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people.”

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

With all the heavy attacks against the Bank in the press many would call it an obsession, so naturally Jackson vetoed the Bank Recharter Bill when it came to his desk. He even went as far as ordering the federal government’s deposits to be removed from the Bank of the United States and put into state banks. Surprisingly to Biddle and his supporters, the people were with Jackson in the decision to vetoing of the bill, and he was overwhelmingly reelected to a second term when the next election came around in 1832. Biddle tried to retaliate by making it extremely difficult for businesses and other people to get the money they needed, which caused an economic decrease at the end of 1833 and into 1834.

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson was President of the United States from 1829 until 1837. He is best known for his policy on the Trail of Tears and United States’ Bank. He is a president fraught with misconceptions and misinformation, however he accomplished good things during his presidency, despite popular misconception. Jackson was his own version of aristocracy. Those in Tennessee and South Carolina had a looser definition of aristocracy than those from New England and the North.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

There were Five Civilized Tribes that lived in Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida. White people were not happy with the land they were on and Jackson forced them to move to the Great Plains because he believed there would be no conflict with them there. In 1830 Jackson pushed for the Indian Removal Act which allowed Native Americans to move west. In 1790 the federal government recognized the Cherokee as a separate nation which led to Georgia taking their land in 1830. The Cherokee went to the United States Supreme Court and they said they had the right to be on that land but President Jackson did not agree which caused the Trail of Tears.

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

To begin, Andrew Jackson was the reason that so many Indians had to leave their homes. This was called the Trail of Tears. This, was the time where the government forced the Indians, mostly the Cherokee, to leave their homes immediately. They could not take any of their belongings with them, other than what they were wearing. About 25% of them died, which was roughly 20,000 Native Americans.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

In this attack, he moved about 20% of United States’ money into private banks. These banks were known as ‘’pet’’ banks because they politically supported Andrew Jackson. This causes what we know as The Bank War. Andrew Jackson enlarged credit by doing away with the bank. Andrew Jackson then moved the money from those banks into the private ones that only supported him.

Read More
2030 Words | 9 Pages

1) Describe the early European and Native American contacts and explain what impact treaties and warfare played in their interactions. What was the Indian Removal Act, the Allotment Act and the Reorganization Act and what their goals and impacts were’? (p.?) The experience of the Native American and the Europeans has been conflicting has at the beginning of the discovery of the new world with Christopher Columbus the on slaughter of the first Native people.

Read More

More about Andrew Jackson Villain Essay

Open Document