ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson's Fight Against Native Americans

903 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The removal of American Indian tribes

Many people, including some historians, portray Andrew Jackson as an “Indian Hater.” Jackson frequently fought against Native Americans, but why did he fight these people? In Pruchas article she talked about many different ways Jackson fought against Native Americans and what his reasoning was. In 1808, Jackson had believed there were a group of settlers that were killed by the creeks. He believed that Great Britain ordered the creeks to come over and kill the settlers. Since that date, Jackson had not spoken of the Indians of any other way that not aimed toward England. He believed that the battle of tippecanoe was because “the excited to war by the secrete agents of Great Britain” (528). He felt like anything bad that had happened or anyone …show more content…

The first of many where you could kill them all but obviously you wouldn't be able to do that and get away with it. Secondly, you could force them to assimilate into the larger dominant society with the settlers. They would have to settle down farm, and live like “other people”. You could allow them to remain in the southeast in these different areas on a portion of their ancestral land but no other land. If that was the case you'd have to make sure you had a large military to protect them because the settlers would always be harassing them. Lastly, you could just remove them all and that seemed the most reasonable and necessary to Jackson. Move them somewhere al-state jurisdictional disputes or white settlers wouldn't get them or do any harassing. They could develop their own civilization at their own pace and wouldn't have to worry about United States laws. Not only was the government going to pay them for their lands they were also going to help them get established in their new place. I felt like removing the Indians would have been more suitable for them, because they were going to get help from the government and be able to create their own civilization. I don't feel like jackson should be criticized for supporting the removal because I felt like he tried to help and protect them. He wanted to remove them so they would be away from white settlers and being harassed all the

Show More
Related
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More
322 Words | 2 Pages

The first reason that lead the United States Government to the removal of The Five Civilized Tribes was land treaties for eventual cotton farms and slave plantations. Andrew Jackson would encourage white squatters to move into the southern Indians land. Jackson then forced the Indians to cede the land to the white men or be wiped out. Jackson wanted the land for eventual slave and cotton plantations: “These treaties, these land grabs laid the basis for the cotton kingdom, the slave plantations”(129). Jackson wanted as much land for farming as possible so that he could take advantage of the booming market of cotton.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

One of many atrocities that Jackson committed was the forceful removal of thousands of Indians and the subsequent death of many of them. Although his reasoning, as is stated in his Message to Congress "On Indian Removal," was

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

If he was really trying to help the Indians get their land back he would have not agreed that remcoing them benefits the Americans. In the treaty of New Echota it states.” That a sum not exceeding five million dollars be paid to the Cherokee Indians for all their land and possessions.” (Treaty of New Echota). Andrew Jackson also signed the New Echota Treaty so he wanted the removal

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Most people think he was cruel for creating the Indian removal act but he was only trying to expand america. Jackson’s plan was to move the Indians out so he can expand the U.S. border to the mississippi. Jackson even gave them their own to move to. Jackson said it would help the natives because it would separate them from white settlers. It would also make them free from the power of the state.

Read More
148 Words | 1 Pages

Jackson’s Native American policies were very undemocratic because they decreased the power of the people. Document 9 states that the Native Americans have reasons to stay on their land, one being that the land west of the Arkansas Territory is unknown to them. Another is that the region is poorly supplied with food and water and that the new neighbors have different customs and a totally different language. Finally, they wish to remain on the land in which their ancestors died and where they were buried. The evidence helps explain that Andrew Jackson’s Native American policy was very undemocratic because the Native Americans had four very good reasons for staying on their homeland.

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

Jackson’s plans of removal were favored by many Americans as he convinced them that it was practical and for the better good of Native Americans. Jackson stated that he had given them many incentives to leave. Native Americans would be provided with ample supplies and supported for a year after their move to western lands. Jackson believed that this was a practical resolution to the issues developing between the two nations. Jackson acknowledged that the intrusion of Americans onto western land was occurring, but he did not believe that it was a genuine problem.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Is Andrew Jackson a hero or a villain? Throughout history Jackson has been viewed as both. Some see him as a war hero and the people’s president. Others see him as a racist and a political tyrant. To me, Andrew Jackson is more of a hero.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

Education resources mention that Jackson treated Native Americans poorly. As well, Discovery Education states, “For example, Jackson’s actions toward Native Americans seemed to reveal that he did not favor their

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

Read More
1737 Words | 7 Pages

He believed Jackson needed a reality check. The Indians were there first, it was their land. He force the Natives to move away from their homeland, with brute force. He believes Jackson could not justify his actions just because it was for America’s benefit. He also stated Jackson refused to listen to many people, and he refused to let Indians live.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Although Jackson was important, he was part of many terrible things. Around the 1820s there were many major indian tribes in eastern United States such as Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. This soon came to a change. Andrew Jackson thought these Indians were in the way of eastern development, using the Indian Removal Act which the congress had approved he decided to kick them out and send them west. In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Indians had the right to self government and the United States could not interfere with that.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore, Andrew Jackson says that “[i]t puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General and State Governments on account of the Indians. It will place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of country now occupied by a few savage hunters” (Jackson 6-7). President Jackson also says that “[i]t will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions.to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community”(Jackson 7). Jackson not only states the benefits to Americans, but he also demonstrates early American ignorance by explaining his feelings toward native Americans. In the address, Jackson believes the natives are not Americans because they are not “civilized” nor “christian” and through the Indian Removal Act, they will become Americans by adopting those ideas.

Read More
374 Words | 2 Pages

However, this source has significant limitations due to Jackson’s motivation in removing the Cherokee, historians cannot be fully assured Jackson included all facts behind the removal. For example, many of the benefits Jackson mentioned in his speech specifically regarding the Cherokee benefiting from removal hardly seem plausible. This calls into attention Jackson’s integrity and honesty throughout the entire speech.

Read More

More about Andrew Jackson's Fight Against Native Americans

Related Topics

Open Document