Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Andrew jackson's indian policies
Andrew jackson's indian policies
Andrew jackson's indian policies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
March 15, 1767 is Andrew Jacksons date of birth in South Carolina. His mother and two brother were killed during the British invasion of the Carolinas which left him with hate toward Great Britain. Andrew Jackson ended up married to Rachel Robards. Jackson was elected quickly to the U.S. Senate however, he quit a year later and was elected Tennessee's judge of the superior court. Later he was picked to be the run the state militia.
The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove
Jackson supported the white men who wanted to see this plan through, because the Indians land was very valuable. They felt they had a legal right to their land, so the Cherokee Indians took Andrew Jackson to court. The case made it all the way to the Supreme Court. Even though the Supreme court had ruled that the Cherokees had a legal right to stay on their land in Worcester v. Georgia, but Jackson still forced them out of their land. The law required the government to negotiate removal treaties fairly, voluntarily and peacefully, which Jackson did not even attempt to
Jackson was a democratic republican who was voted into office in 1828. During the election against john quincy adams , he appealed to the people through the common man. Because he was born in North Carolina , he presented many ideas that would benefit the common man. He also used the spoil system in order to gain supporters. The spoil system enabled people to get a position in government as long as they voted for him.
When the regular white miner reached the land, they were expecting to get half million dollars in gold, but they got less than five dollars a day from gold alone. The government would force the Indians off their land and sell it to the whites. The Indians would demand a treaty from the government, which the government would make, ignore, and force more land off the Indians. The Indians would once again demand a treaty, and the same results would happen. Andrew Jackson with a history of thinking that removing Indians form their native land and moving them away, even at gunpoint; eventually decided to sign the Indian Removal Act when he became president.
Because of that Jackson believed that they could be removed with violence. Andrew Jackson was a good president even though he did not respect the indians. The people also believed that he could defend them, since he was a general in the Battle of New Orleans. He made a courteous society instead of crooked democrats. Jackson was distinguished as a "true American" when he was a candidate for president.
This was because Jackson wanted more land for more crops. The crops would bring in more money supply. The document states that the walk to new territory was very long and many native americans died on the way. Jackson was showing acts of absolute authority. In the Indian Removal Document 2, itr states that Jackson did not care about the lack of food source, safe water, and the language barriers.
The original relationship with the Indians was positive, but more was happening than what was on the surface. The Indians were being manipulated from the beginning, and given less than what was taken from them. It was believed that Indians should have the right to their own nation, and should not have their rights taken away from them. (Document B) However, at the time of Washington’s Administration after the war, The Indians were given less than half the land they had before American Independence through the treaty of Holston.
After that, Jackson compared the superiority of the white men to the weaknesses and bad qualities of the Indians to support even farther why the white men should take the land. He tells Congress that the sanity of the white men leads them to choosing an extensive republic over a country covered with forests and savage communities. He compares the loyalty of the Indians with that of the “civilized Christian men.” What can the government do but agree? Why?
Andrew Jackson caused the death of 12,290 Indians during Indian removal. Andrew Jackson was the 7th President of the United States of America and a former general during the War of 1812.He quickly rose to power by being the “voice of the common man” he had 11 children and a wife yet he also signed one of the most conservation act ever the Indian Removal Act. Andrew Jackson shouldn 't be allowed to be on our money because he caused the death of tens of thousands of Indians and violates the constitution.
According to “The Trail of Tears,” American History Illustrated, 97% of Georgians voted for Jackson for president because he supported their expansion into Indigenous lands to the northwest (Document A). This made westward expansion a major policy goal of the Jackson campaign, which was possible only by relocating Indigenous peoples. So what? Moreover, in President Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress on Indian removal on December 6, 1830, Jackson presented the removal of Indigenous “savages” as a positive idea for the growth of the nation (Document E). He presented the building of cities, farms, and industries as natural progress, which the Indigenous peoples were blocking.
Jackson proposed this bill because he wanted to relocate the Indians, specifically the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole, to the west side of the Mississippi River. Jackson referred to the Indians as “savages” and talked very derogatory of them. However, a scheme was pitched between the United States and the Indians. In exchange, the Indians would give the United States their land, and the United States would give the Indians land west of the Mississippi River.
So he sent them a message saying they needed to move or they would have difficulties. In the message he also uses the condition of the Creeks as a threat all so saying their men are committing depredations to the white citizens and they are making blood shed. Andrew Jackson uses many threats to the Cherokee but making it sound like they are
The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were
Lastly, you could just remove them all and that seemed the most reasonable and necessary to Jackson. Move them somewhere al-state jurisdictional disputes or white settlers wouldn't get them or do any harassing. They could develop their own civilization at their own pace and wouldn't have to worry about United States laws. Not only was the government going to pay them for their lands they were also going to help them get established in their new place. I felt like removing the Indians would have been more suitable for them, because they were going to get help from the government and be able to create their own civilization.