ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson's America Analysis

1794 Words8 Pages

In the article “The Hunger for Indian Land in Andrew Jackson’s America” written by Anthony F. C. Wallace, the treatment of Indian tribes and land in the Jacksonian Era is discussed. This purpose of the article is to explain the reason for Indian removal that occurred under Andrew Jackson’s presidency. The thesis of this article is that Americans kicked the natives off of their land to expand America's cotton industry. In Wallace’s first point he explains Andrew Jackson's reasons for removing the Indians from their lands were for his personal interest rather than for the good of the people. Jackson was looking at land that was in Northern Alabama and was seen as a “prospectively lucrative site for agricultural development” (Wallace). The United …show more content…

He uses plenty of statistics that support his ideas on cotton production and finally he doesn’t blame Jackson for the removal of the Indians, he takes other factors into account. When Wallace explained John Ross’s background he was telling us that he was a “half-breed,” but that didn’t stop him from opposing Jackson’s Indian Removal Act and from fighting in the Battle of Horseshoe Bend. The statistics that helped support the ideas about the cotton production made it to where they could predict how much cotton was being used every year and compensate for the next year to come. It was also used as a way to gauge the increase in cotton need and production, as well as what would make the cotton economy move faster. This helps us to understand the motives for Indian Removal.Wallace explains the different reasons why the Indians were removed from their land without blaming it on Jackson. He does this by pointing out the growth of the Industrial Revolution, the high demand for more cotton, and the promise that was made to purchase the Native American land in Georgia by the federal government. This all adds to the historical period by show different points of view of topics we thought for sure were only one way. All of them show how it’s not just one factor that makes things happen, but multiple factors that influence events. This …show more content…

The slave trade was when settlers took Africans out of their country and brought them to America to use as workers and laborers that they didn’t pay or keep healthy. The slave trade and the Indian Removal Act are similar because both of them did not get the choice on if they got to move from their homes, they were just told to by the Americans. They were also based on racism and greed as

Show More
Related
1426 Words | 6 Pages

Though the book is brief, it is a great overview of the event. It is a simple read, as he has intended it to be “mainly for students of history and others primarily interested in this historical event” (preface viii). Wallace claims

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

Jackson took on a new persona, he still embodied the West but was stained by his ruthless takeover of Indian Land and the forced relocation of Indians. It is evident there are many different perspectives on

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

General Andrew jackson chased away some of the native indians and took spanish forts and people who have escaped and hid in a place to not get thrown back to jail. Later on all of the americans liked the action that he took and so he received approval from the politicians. John Quincy on the other hand, demanded that spain control the person or animal that lives in florida or give it up. In the paragraph the author states that “General Andrew Jackson chased some fleeing Native Indians over the boundary.”

Read More
1501 Words | 7 Pages

Native Americans who emigrated from Europe perceived the Indians as a friendly society with whom they dwelt with in harmony. While Native Americans were largely intensive agriculturalists and entrepreneurial in nature, the Indians were hunters and gatherers who earned a livelihood predominantly as nomads. By the 19th century, irrefutable territories i.e. the areas around River Mississippi were under exclusive occupation by the Indians. At the time, different Indian tribes such as the Chickasaws, Creeks, and Cherokees had adapted a sedentary lifestyle and practiced small-scale agriculture. According to the proponents of removal, the Indians were to move westwards into forested lands in order to generate additional space for development through agricultural production (Memorial of the Cherokee Indians).

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

2.2 In Andrew Jackson’s argument, Jackson addresses his opinions about the treaty and Cherokees that let us know the main purpose of this treaty, “[i]t seems now to be an established fact that [Cherokees] can not live in contact with a civilized community and prosper.” And he also explains the new settlements and those people’s lives, “…the Indians are removed at the expense of the United States, and with certain supplies of clothing, arms, ammunition, and other indispensable articles; they are also furnished gratuitously with provisions for the period of a year after their arrival at their new

Read More
984 Words | 4 Pages

Yours Post: Andrew Jackson, seventh President of the United States, was the predominant on-screen character in American politics between Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln. Destined to cloud folks and stranded in youth, he was the first "independent man" and the first westerner to achieve the White House. He turned into a democratic image and author of the Democratic Party, the nation's most respected political association. Amid his two-term administration, he extended official powers and changed the President's part from boss director to mainstream tribune. An uncertain, dubious idea, Jacksonian Democracy in the strictest sense alludes basically to the command of Andrew Jackson and the Democratic Party after 1828.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout the early 19th century, changing politics and an evolving society in America impacted all classes of people, specifically the white working class. Jacksonian Democratic ideals was influenced by the working class, and the white working class benefited from President Jackson’s decisions. During the year of Jackson’s presidential election, the Workies, which consisted of working men, wanted to protect individuals who earned money from arduous labor, but failed to make payments punctually. Jacksonian Democrats realized the Workies language was valuable in the fact that beliefs of the Workies group echoed through Jackson’s party.

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

In the Andrew Jackson speech to congress on indian removal, It talks about the reasons why they should be removed. Andrew Jackson's main reason why they should be removed is because of westward expansion and how it's the whites turn to develop the land. He also says how it will benefit both people even though it would actually make the Indians life worse. I thought it was interesting how they thought the Indians were the problem on westward expansion. In their eyes they thought whites and Indians couldn't mix.

Read More
1737 Words | 7 Pages

He believed Jackson needed a reality check. The Indians were there first, it was their land. He force the Natives to move away from their homeland, with brute force. He believes Jackson could not justify his actions just because it was for America’s benefit. He also stated Jackson refused to listen to many people, and he refused to let Indians live.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Although Jackson was important, he was part of many terrible things. Around the 1820s there were many major indian tribes in eastern United States such as Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. This soon came to a change. Andrew Jackson thought these Indians were in the way of eastern development, using the Indian Removal Act which the congress had approved he decided to kick them out and send them west. In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Indians had the right to self government and the United States could not interfere with that.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

During the “Gilded Age” period of American history, development of the Trans-Mississippi west was crucial to fulfilling the American dream of manifest destiny and creating an identity which was distinctly American. Since the west is often associated with rugged pioneers and frontiersmen, there is an overarching idea of hardy American individualism. However, although these settlers were brave and helped to make America into what it is today, they heavily relied on federal support. It would not have been possible for white Americans to settle the Trans-Mississippi west without the US government removing Native Americans from their lands and placing them on reservations, offering land grants and incentives for people to move out west, and the

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

The differences in positions between President Andrew Jackson and US Senator and vice-presidential running mate of Henry Clay, Theodore Frelinghuysen, are largely to due the differences in perception of the value of the Cherokees history in America and the superiority of the white man. Jackson believed that the Natives were savages that did not deserve the vast lands of the country but rather that the whites were entitled to it because they were much more “civilized” and “prosperous” as he claims in his Case for the Removal Act in 1829, rhetorically questioning,“What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and raged by a few thousand savages to our extensive Republic, studded with cities, towns, and prosperous farms, embellished with all the improvements which art can devise or industry execute, occupied by more than 12,000,000 happy people, and filled with all the blessings of liberty, civilization,

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

"He always addressed Indians as though they were children, irrespective of their age, education, or intellectual maturity. " When negotiating, Jackson would often use bribery or the threat of violence if his demands were rejected. It’s this kind of cruelty that makes people think of him as a relentless enemy of Indians. Remini follows Jackson into Tennessee where he develops into "a bold and resourceful Indian fighter, thirsting for encounters with savages.”

Read More
1874 Words | 8 Pages

The policies made by Jackson during his presidency were indeed motivated by racism, and he used them to ruin the lives of Native Americans, eliminate their culture and uniqueness, as well as to drive them out of their homes. One way Jackson’s

Read More

More about Andrew Jackson's America Analysis

Open Document