More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of westward expansion to the west
Perspective on indian removal
Impacts of westward expansion to the west
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove
President Jackson claimed that it was in the best interest of the States, the citizens, growth of the Southwest and of the Indians for Indians to be relocated west. One of President Jackson’s main point was that “it will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; and allow them to pursue happiness in their own
The tone and diction used in Samuel’s Memory, and Andrew Jackson's speech on the Indian removal act share differences and similarities. Analyzing, both sides of the removal act, and how the people reacted differently due to the writer's tone using positive and negative connotations. As well as the diction used in each piece of writing. Jackson uses different tones and diction to persuade readers to believe him. Each piece of writing shares a main purpose.
Bill debates that were proposed by Jackson began later on in February, 1830. Between the House and the Senate, the debate was quite relentless. Many people that went against this bill had many concerns with it, that needed to be discussed. They felt as if they could feel the Native American’s pain as they went through all that trouble. They also felt like they didn’t want to both the Indians during treaty-making.
"It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people." -- Andrew Jackson’s speech about the Indian Removal Act of 1830 in 1830. The Cherokee are a Native American Tribe that live in Oklahoma and North Carolina, and have lived there for decades. In 1830, Andrew Jackson (the president during this time) was mad because the Cherokee Indians had been hurting and scalping people in Georgia. Because of this, Jackson put up the idea of a removal act, a way to get the Cherokee to either move out of Georgia or abide by state law.
Early in Jacksons administration he passed the Indian Removal Act (1830) which gave the government funding to remove the ‘Five Civilised Tribes’ which included the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole Indians – a total of nearly 60,000. The act authorised the relocation of the tribes previously situated to the east of the Mississippi river to the west. The act didn’t allow the forced removal of the tribes but it allowed Jackson to negotiate with the tribes for their land which he did and led to their removal. This was made worse as the tribes unlike the other Indian tribes had done all they could to integrate into American society. For example, the Cherokee tribe created their own written language which set a precedent for Indians, they established education for their children, and even created a constitution which they had to adhere to.
Therefore, he initialized the Indian Removal Act, and Congress passed it in 1830. This forced Native Americans east of the Mississippi River to proceed to the west side of the river. The Cherokee were willing to change to the white man ways, but Jackson just pushed them away. When the Cherokee were in alliance with the U.S., Andrew Jackson acknowledged them as a nation. While Jackson was against the Cherokee, he said they were not a nation.
Andrew Jackson’s belief in equality, however left out many, including the Native Americans and that was the fly in the ointment so to speak. It is quite easy to see that he could not simply ignore the Indians as he built the great nation. These are the original folks who knew the land well. They were humans and they would continue to multiply. The idea of a reservation would restrict their movement and give some sort of control as the country forged.
First, The indian removal act was to move the indian tribes that were occupying land onto western reservations. The indian tribes tried to go to court to fight against the act using the government. The supreme court agreed with the indians, that they did not have to move, but President Jackson made them move anyway because he believed that the supreme court could not support its ruling. President Jackson went against the Supreme Court so that he could sell the land for more money after the indians were relocated. The evidence in this paragraph was taken from the document “President Jackson and Indian Removal.”
Through document F, Jackson believes the Indians should be removed by what he calls, "a fair exchange, and, at the expense of the United States, to send them to land where their existence may be prolonged and perhaps made perpetual... It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their way and under their own rude [simple] institutions". Jackson believed that it was best for the Indians to get out of the white territory. He thought it would free them from the many white customs and laws so they could be truly free. However, the choice the Indians wanted was to stay.
Andrew Jackson was one of the most proud and aggressive presidents the United States of America had seen so far in it’s young age. A demonstration of such a personality was his enforcement of the Native American Removal Policy. This Policy stated that all Natives be moved west of the Mississippi River, regardless of the Supreme Court’s rulings. This act of removing Native Americans from The United States of America was very beneficial to Americans, but unfortunately, was not helpful to the Native Americans at all. From this policy, Americans would gain more land, end America’s dispute between states and Federation on Indians, and would allow existing states to have a larger population and stronger militia.
The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.
Around the 1820s, whites worked to increasingly survey and squat tribal lands. Indians often experienced great injustice from whites. Furthermore, in 1830 President Andrew Jackson issued for the Indian Removal Act, which granted him the ability to "exchange public lands in the West for Indian territories in the East" (255). Further evidence, Jackson's excerpt stated that, "It will relieve the whole state of Mississippi and the Western part of Alabama of Indian occupancy, and enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power" {Doc E}. With this
Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.
As President Andrew Jackson noted in 1832, if no one intended to enforce the Supreme Court’s rulings (which he certainly did not), then the decisions would “[fall]…still born. ”44 Southern states were determined to take ownership of Native lands and would go to great lengths to secure this territory, burning out Natives and squatting on their lands.45 President Andrew Jackson outlined his Indian removal policy in his Second Annual Message to Congress.46 Jackson's comments on Indian removal begin with the words, "It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation. Two important tribes have accepted the provision made for their removal at the last session of Congress, and it is believed that their example will induce the remaining tribes also to seek the same obvious advantages.47 Once gold was found in Georgia, the Native populations of the South had to be removed. The Five Civilized Tribes were to be relocated by the federal government.
