ipl-logo

Annexed The Philippines

634 Words3 Pages

Should The U.S. Have Annexed The Philippines?

When the Spanish-American war came to an end and Spain gave up their power in the Philippines and Cuba, the US showed they had no interest in annexing Cuba but were debating on whether or not they should annex the Philippines. The possibility of annexation pleased some but it also made other unhappy, like Emilio Aguinaldo who wanted the Philippines to be free from colonization. In his fight for the island’s freedom, Aguinaldo started a rebellion against the US army and soon enough the Philippine American war began. The instability in this island led to much debate over whether or not the annexation would benefit or detriment the Philippines.
A common viewpoint on the annexation of the Philippines was that it was a necessary action because without U.S involvement, the island would be unfit to look after itself. An example of a …show more content…

People who opposed the annexation of the Philippines were often anti-imperialists who believed conquering foreign lands went against the concepts of republicanism. In “Platform of the American Anti-Imperialist League” (Document A), we are presented with the common beliefs such as the fact that the U.S. did not have the authority to rule another country or colony without its permission. The document expresses that taking control of a land without its peoples’ permission is cruel and oppressive. An example of an anti-imperialist is William Jennings Bryan. In his speech “Paralyzing Influence of Imperialism” (Document D), Bryan asserts that U.S. intervention on the Island is unnecessary because the Filipinos are just seeking independence, they do not want any control. He also states that in order for us to trade with them we do not have to control their territory. In Bryan’s eyes, it is best to leave the island alone and let them become a strong unified nation on their

Show More
Related
588 Words | 3 Pages

The spirit of 1776 was independence and by annexing the Philippines the US took away the independence of the Philippines as well as the Filipino people. Taking away the independence of another colony/nation is hypocritical because it goes against the values of which the US was founded on. The Philippines should not have been annexed because the US could still profit from the Philippines without annexation. “It is not necessary to own people to trade with them,”(document D). The US did not profit from annexing the Philippines, trade wise, because they could still trade with them whether they were annexed into the US or not.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand, Hoganson had a different outlook on the annexation of The Philippines. She saw the takeover as way of dictatorship. Hoganson said,” The savage, childlike, and feminine stereotypes appealed to imperialists because they not only suggested the Filipinos' incapacity for selfgovernment, but also enabled imperialists to cast themselves as civilizers and authoritative heads of household—that is, as men who wielded power” (Hoganson). American viewed the people of the Philippines as simple minded and easy to control. She interpreted the annexation as a way for white business men to feed their hunger of power.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

The united states had achieved lots of power, economically and politically. After we gained power of a number of small countries we couldn 't give them back so we demanded use of land for naval bases and resources. we educated the filipinos, uplifted and civilized them the best we could to help them and us. After the civil war the united stated need economic growth.

Read More
1274 Words | 6 Pages

According to McKinley, we could not give the Philippines back to Spain because we would look foolish.

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

The answer is an emphatic no. It was a waste of money and resources, they were as cruel and inflexible as Spain in their opinion of how to treat the natives, and it went against all governmental beliefs the U.S. stood for. Annexing the Philippines was not a wise decision. Although the idea seemed great at the time, annexing the Philippines was a major waste

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

The U.S. was given more land to control, including the Philippine islands, which McKinley found to be a problem because the islands were so far away and expanded over thousands of miles. Eventually, McKinley decided to annex the Philippines, and American support for the foreign policy soon followed. American imperialism was embraced by many because it allowed for the United States to get closer to becoming a major player on the world stage. Some believed it was their duty to “Christianize” the Filipinos; others believed it was a stepping stone for trade with China. Those in opposition of annexing the Philippines, especially the Anti-Imperialist League, believed that it didn’t align with American

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

Should the U.S. have Annexed the Philippine Islands? The U.S. desire to expand and become an imperial power in the world, took effect. The U.S. had maintained its three beliefs. In time these beliefs fueled the desire, and the first would be acting as an individual by relying upon yourself for economic and military support.

Read More
374 Words | 2 Pages

William McKinley in his thoughts on American Expansionism has identified the reasons why America had no other choice but to incorporate Philippines as a part of it. This writing has been lifted from the excerpts of an interview with William McKinley soon after Spain had surrendered in the Spanish-American war. McKinley cleverly talks in this interview about how Philippines just came and fell into the laps of America thereby suggesting the helpless stance of America. He talks about how America’s sole intention and purpose had only been to safeguard its own interests as a country. He had to order that the Spanish fleets in Manila be destroyed because if left unattended, they would have crossed the Pacific and wreaked havoc in the American states

Read More
1190 Words | 5 Pages

In the end, we drastically changed their government systems to resemble something like the government system the U.S uses. The U.S also planted their own politicians in the government's placed in these islands. To many Americans, civilization had been brought to these out reaching lands. Document C highlights that feeling of superiority as Alvert J. Beveridge speaks of the Philippines having a bloody rule from which the U.S saved them from. He also talks about the U.S having a humane and civil government compared to the Philippines.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

When we made allies of the Filipinos and armed them to fight against Spain”. In my opinion, I think that the people of America had just gone based off of what President Lincoln had stated so greatly before. Yes, he may have expired from this Earth, but based of of what he had been saying corresponds very well to the situation at hand. To me, I think that Abraham Lincoln was one of the greatest Presidents of all time. The wonderful saying that Abraham Lincoln said (Based off of the article in Document A): “no man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent.

Read More
197 Words | 1 Pages

The annexation of Texas was a contentious issue in the United States. According to the reading, the critics argued about the consequences of annexing Texas would be "the wealth and cares brought by expansion" would make the US government certain to die. Moreover, others assumed that "expansions was a scheme by southern slave owners to add new slave states and thus increase their power" (p134). On the other hand, the opponents such as Walker mentioned the threatened consequences of not annexing Texas such as abolishing slavery problems, "the country would face economic depression, civil war, and dismemberments; and America's most powerful enemy would be handed a potent weapon with which to menace the nation's security ... should annexation

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

America wanted to civilize them from the issues that is occurring. According to Document 4, “America is trying to show how the Filipinos that America can make their “dreams” come true erasing their problems with freedom, education, and justice.” The Filipinos wanted the independence, making US leader seizing the opportunity to control the Philippines by showing pull factors. United States didn’t really care about the issues going on in the Philippines. Controlling Philippines allows the United States a mid pacific port for trade purists.

Read More
1367 Words | 6 Pages

After the war, America was awarded with the philippines, not sure with what to do with them, they looked at the reasons for imperialism, and expanding their own nation. In regard to expanding, The United States, bought Alaska from russia for 7.2 million dollars. And sugar farmers in Hawaii, overthrew the queen, and annexed to the United States. With the philippines, there were 3 main ways to do diplomacy. 3 different presidents each had their own way of dealing with the issues.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

In being an anti-imperialist the worrisome is not that one opposes the idea of expansion of religion, commercial, and constitutional. It’s that with the annexing of these tropical islands would come to a result of the American system of self government would be that America might abandon this idea that makes America that nation it is to this point. Three reasons why the U.S should avoid imperialism is because it fails to follow that criteria of the constitution, could lead to tyrants like behavior, and could lead to conflict One argument that can’t be missed is the fact that the constitutions sets forth a principle that states “consent of the governed” after further research this means that to imperialize and annex other islands would violate

Read More
1569 Words | 7 Pages

The UK 2050 Calculator is an energy model that simulates national energy and emissions to provide a detailed, decision-based impact analysis on land use, emissions and energy, energy flows and electricity breakdown [1]. The tool was designed specifically, to model a diverse area of the UK economy and the resulting greenhouse gas emissions to illustrate the level of change, as well as potential trade-offs that will be required. Although three variations of the model were created, the web tool is aimed at expert stakeholders, such as officials, politicians, technicians and industry, whilst remaining accessible to the general public [2, 1]. It allows long-term, strategic planning to quickly compare the impact of several energy and emission pathways in achieving the UK Government’s 2050 emissions reduction targets. This is achieved through a detailed list of possible scenarios, - influenced by consumer habits, industry and commerce, transport and the energy sector - each with four possible trajectories representing the level of change induced [1].

Read More

More about Annexed The Philippines

Related Topics

Open Document