The exegetical challenges proposed by the Anonymous Iamblichi and the Double Arguments purports that life is filled with conundrums, thus there is never a single way to view a subject. According to the text, for an individual who conducts what is deemed to be good is really doing a bad deed. For example, when farming is going well and produces good crops it is beneficial to the farmers, yet bad for the merchants. Another example is war, which is good for the winners but bad for the losers. Moreover, an additional challenge posed by the text is truth versus falsehood. For instance, someone in the eyes of a neighbor is viewed as a caring individual, however, possesses traits that are opposite from those that are demonstrated. Therefore,