ipl-logo

Anti Federalists Dbq Analysis

227 Words1 Pages
After the American Revolution, two political parties by the people in an effort to form a government of their own. Anti-Federalists wanted small local government and Federalists wanted large Federal centered Government. Anti-Federalists are afraid of a strong government because “when the people fear the government, there is tyranny…[and] when the government fears the people there is liberty” (Doc B). This shows that the Anti-Federalists want a weak government because it is bad when the government is given all the power. Anti-Federalists argue for policies that support agriculture because “those who labor the earth are the chosen people of God” (Doc D). Anti-Federalists like local government because “our country is too large to have all the
Show More
Related
564 Words | 3 Pages

The anti federalists were mainly apprehensive about the Constitution, because they favored strong state governments and felt that the Constitution

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

The argument between the Federalists and the Antifederalists principally centre on the Artivles of Confederation-Consitution. The Federalists and the Antifederalists have thier interpretions wheather the fedel government necessarliy exits or not. The Federalists believe that the relationship between fedel government and fifty states governments is stable and helpful. In contrast, the Antifederalists oppose this political struture and democratic goals, so that they think that the exitence of fedel government suppose to get corrupt. On the other hand, the Federalists and the Antifederalists also have different views about slaveries.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

Since the amount of people in congress compare to the people was small, the anti-federalist feared that the congress will only focus on the few elites among the people the congress control. Finally, the congress were against the judicial branch because they feared that the Supreme Court was too powerful. By having a Supreme Court, it feared that it will take away the power from the states and local courts. Which will lead to the government to take away the people’s

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

There were less anti-federalists than federalists because more people wanted equal people in the government and more unification of the country than not. The Constitution gave organization to America because the nation or federal government had more power than the state

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Previously, the colonists had problems with a faulty government and feared tyranny. When the colonists first had the opportunity to self-govern, The Articles of Confederation was formed and thus a poor example of government. The Articles of Confederation creating a weak, defenceless and powerless country. In the second attempt to create a more perfect government, the Constitution of the United States of America was formed. The colonists decided to place a guard against tyranny and thus, over 230 years after the writing of the Constitution of the United States, The Constitution in fact protects the states, the states rights and the citizens rights against tyranny.

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

It could be argued that as the history of the United States has unfolded, the ratification of the Constitution was relatively successful. One might also argue that the Document Americans hold so sacred was ratified with the wrong intent in the first place. Nonetheless, the state representatives chosen to vote on the ratification had a substantial task in front of them. Had I been one of those representatives, I believe that I would have voted against the ratification of the Constitution due to the lack of rights left in the hands of individual states, the absence of term regulations for elected presidents, and the turn away from a truly republican governmental system. Based on the political climate of the late 1700s surrounding the state representatives

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

When you put the two names next to each other and compare Federalist versus Anti-Federalists and what is thought of it is always a topic that has always been a bit harsh or even arguable to the people of this nation. Federalists and Anti-Federalists had extremely different points of views on how to run their nation and the way the government should be set up. Federalists had faith in our people and believed that they should be the ones running the government. They were avid believers of many things such as a strong central government, a central bank, and an even those that protect our rights, the army. Federalist no. 39 states “It is ESSENTIAL to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claim for their government the honorable title of

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

“Anti-federalist concern that anything not included in the Constitution would not be protected” (Amendment 9). The quote from Amendment 9 proves the Anti-federalists feared a strong central government because, if something was not written in the Constitution then it would

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

Federalist and Anti-Federalist had different views on the new constitution. The Federalist supported strong central government and did not want the Bill of Rights. Anti-Federalist wanted power in the states and wanted limited federal power. The framers chose to create a strong federal government because they wanted a government that could bring together a belief within the states without reducing other states ability to control itself. They wanted small states because it would make is easier to reach an agreement.

Read More
199 Words | 1 Pages

The federalist want a New Constitution because Federalist want a fresh start and want to avoid tyranny. In my opinion the Anti-Federalist is the weaker government between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Anti-Federalist do not want states to have their own government. Not having a government in charge of each individual state

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

Are you a Federalist or an Anti-Federalist? The proportional representation of the people and the government in the pursuit of equality and happiness is thoroughly explained through the Anti-Federalist party. Jackson Turner Main wrote, "to them, the man of 'federal principles' approved of 'federal measures,' which meant those that increased the weight and authority or extended the influence of the Confederation Congress." By stating this he intended to provide the explanation and root of the problem; the egos of both parties, especially federalists were a constant wall blocking the parties from a resolution The Anti-Federalists were composed of many differential elements.

Read More
123 Words | 1 Pages

Though a small republic can 't resist the mischief of faction, there is a way for a large republic to be able to resist. In small republics the number of people is a low amount, as for large republics the number of people is higher and there is a difference of opinions. The fact that large republics have a more numerous amount of people this means that the factions will be numerous as well and will also be smaller and weaker. Because they have so many different factions it is very easy for the government to just ignore them. It is stated in the handout that Madison is refuting, "the Anti-federalists ' argument that a republic would soon crumble under the pressure of factional divisions."

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

The Anti Federalist are afraid that the government would enlarge their powers. We got the idea of bill of rights from England where it originated from. The magna Carta is an example of the government trying to enlarge their powers and control the citizens. The Anti Federalist don’t want the federalist to follow through with this mistake. The government should not be allowed to rule over the citizens and have it become an oligarchy.

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

Anti-Federalists were a partnership of people who were against the Constitution. Federalist Papers have eighty-five letters written in newspapers in the late 1780s to represent the partnership of the U.S. Constitution. Many politicians best like JAMES WINTHROP who is in Massachusetts and MELANCTON SMITH who is in New York and Patrick Henry and George Mason of Virginia, these Antifederalist were linked by a huge number of regular Americans mostly land farmers who had authority in country America. The one of supreme social characteristic of the Antifederalists as a group was their abilities in newer rectifying western regions of the country. Federalists are defenders that suggest Constitution.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

Federalists or Anti-federalists are both fair sides, and each side has an arguable amount of supporters. I am an Anti-federalist, or someone who opposes the Constitution. Moreover, we believe that the Constitution takes too much power away from the people. The Federalists on the other hand are those who support the Constitution. They link themselves with the idea of federalism, and federalism is when power is divided and shared between a central government and local governments.

Read More

More about Anti Federalists Dbq Analysis

Open Document