ipl-logo

Anti Federalists Feared A Strong Central Government Essay

665 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays regarding federalists and antifederalists

In the Bill Of Rights, there our 10 different Amendments. The different Amendments prove the the Anti-federalists feared the strong central government, and desired a limited government, and had protections of basic freedoms. The Bill Of Rights show that they feared a strong central government because Amendment 9 was included into the Bill Of Rights. Anti-federalists feared a strong central government because Amendment 9 talks about how no ones right will be taken away. “Anti-federalist concern that anything not included in the Constitution would not be protected” (Amendment 9). The quote from Amendment 9 proves the Anti-federalists feared a strong central government because, if something was not written in the Constitution then it would …show more content…

Anti-federalist wanted limited government because Amendment 10 talks about how Amendment 10s main job was to control the limited power of the federal government. “This amendment was designed to limit the power of the federal government” (Amendment 10). The quote from Amendment 10 proves that if the Anti-federalist agree to the Bill Of Rights then Amendment 10 will do its job, of keeping limited power of the federal government. Additional, the Anti-federalist desired limited government because Amendment 10 talks about how limited power will keep the king the same and make sure that the state's power our the same “The Tenth Amendment provides each state with powers that our not specifically assigned to the nation's government in the Constitution” (Amendment 10). Anti-federalist desired limited government because Amendment 10 talks about how the Anti-federalists were against getting a new king because they believed with the same king they could keep state's power the …show more content…

Anti-federalist wanted protection of freedom because Amendment 1 talks about how it grants freedom of speech and freedom of many other things that they wanted free. “The First Amendment grants freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and the right to protest” (Amendment 1). The quote from Amendment 1 proves the the Anti-federalist want freedom because with freedom they can write their opinions, petition of their government. Finally the Anti-federalist wanted protection of freedom because Amendment 3 talks about how soldiers are not allowed to go into citizens house without permission. “The third Amendment states that soldiers cannot take over a home during war or peace without the homeowners permission” (Amendment 3). This quote from Amendment 3 proves the the citizens have the right to tell people yes or no because of Amendment 3 proves that and Amendment 1 also proves

Show More
Related

Confederation Vs Constitution Dbq Essay

656 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, the anti-federalist proposed the Bill of Rights to be added along with the Constitution. The Anti-federalist felt secure with the Bill of Rights in the Constitution because it protects citizens liberty and freedom. In the end, the founding fathers gathered and agreed to add the Bill of Rights when ratifying the Constitution. Furthermore, Anti-federalists were mainly farmers and they feared that under the Constitution economic policies their business will be endanger.

Read More

Summary Of The Second Amendment By David E. Vandercoy

868 Words | 4 Pages

Both Federalists, those promoting a strong central government, and the Antifederalists, those believing that liberties including the right of self-rule would be protected best by preservation of local autonomy, agreed that arms and liberty were inextricably linked. Additional views on the relationship between freedom and arms were expressed when the Constitution was being submitted to the states for ratification. The Antifederalists believed that governmental tyranny was the primary evil against which the people had to defend in creating a new constitution; and, to prevent such tyranny, they argued for the addition of a Bill of Rights which included, among other rights, the right to keep and bear arms. The Federalists, those supporting the Constitution as drafted, did not dispute the premise that governmental tyranny was the primary evil that people had to guard against. In summary, both Federalists and Antifederalists believed that the main danger to the republic was tyrannical government and the ultimate check on tyrannical government was an armed population for the sake of liberty (Vandercoy

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

1511 Words | 7 Pages

Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

Read More

Analysis Of The Antifederaliss Were Right By Gary Galles

313 Words | 2 Pages

The article, “The Antifederalists Were Right”, Mises Daily, September 27, 2006 by Gary Galles examines Anti-Federalists’ predictions and if we don’t limit of the federal government it will lead to corruption of power. The Anti-Federalist believed that ratifying the U.S Constitution will create an overbearing central government. Even though the Anti-Federalist lost the debate and was overlooked, their predictions about the result of the Constitution turned out the be true. The Anti-Federalist suggested the Bill of Rights to let the people have rights, however the Constitution was too vague which leads to abuse of power. Some of the vague laws are the “general welfare” which lead to the override limits on delegated federal powers and creating

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Three Fifths Compromise

1157 Words | 5 Pages

In Massachusetts, the Anti-Federalists, led by James Madison, argued that the Bill of Rights was necessary to protect people rights from the government because the government might get too powerful and hurt people’s rights and freedom. They had this fear because they suffered from the British tyranny and worried that the highly centralized government would make the miserable history happen again. Nevertheless, in favor of the government, the Federalists insisted that the Bill of Rights were unnecessary because the Constitution already limited the power of government, so it would not get too powerful. Also, they worried that people might forget to list certain rights in the Bill of Rights, so if later they were fighting for their rights that were not written in the document, the government might use it against them. Eventually, a compromise was made through a vote in Massachusetts; Anti-Federalists agreed to ratify the Constitution without the Bill of Rights, but they should also submit amendments for the Congress to consider adding the Bill of Rights.

Read More

Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

827 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More

The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More

Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti-Federalists Dbq

581 Words | 3 Pages

In other words, the Constitution, written by educated, rich men, would grant more power to those already in a high position. To add to this, the anti-Federalists stated that Constitution was not secure enough to uphold citizens’ rights. The Constitution would be responsible for the endangerments of human rights such as trial by jury and liberty of the press. The anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution because they thought it was an unfitting solution, which would lead the U.S. down the same path of injustice as Great Britain

Read More

Bill Of Rights Dbq

267 Words | 2 Pages

After the Constitution was sent to states for ratification, the people felt the Constitution did not protect the natural rights of the American citizens. The cause or reason for this addition to the Constitution was to ensure that the rights detailed in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were not thought to be the only possible rights of American citizens. The Anti-Federalists, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and George Mason, said that if certain rights weren't specifically granted to the people, the government would easily take over these rights and abuse the people in the country. The Federalists, George Washington, John Adams, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, said that the Constitution give the government to do things that were

Read More

Anti-Federalists Vs Anti Federalist

1859 Words | 8 Pages

In Federalist no. 51, he explained the distribution of powers between the states and the nation within the three branches of national government (Abernathy 71). Under this structure, none would be above another. The Constitution still did not appeal to the Anti Federalists. They enforced an addition of Bill of Rights to promise citizens their rights and protection (Abernathy 74). Ten amendments to the Constitution were added to please

Read More

The Ten Amendments Of The United States Constitution

675 Words | 3 Pages

In contrast, anti-federalists believed that the amendments should be kept because they were needed. Of course as we all know about know, the government has kept these amendments ever since they were brought up by James

Read More

Robert Yates Anti Federalist 17 Summary

445 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective

Read More

Essay On Anti Federalist

622 Words | 3 Pages

The Anti Federalist The anti-federalist papers were written document about why the idea of federalist is bad. three problems they had with the Constitution were the president as military king, what congress can do; what a state can not, bill of rights. These were only three of the issues I found that the anti-federalist had with the constitution. The first paper I found was the The President As Military King, anti-federalist paper #74.

Read More

Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More

More about Anti Federalists Feared A Strong Central Government Essay

Open Document