ipl-logo

Confederation Vs Constitution Dbq Essay

656 Words3 Pages

After series of taxation without representation placed upon the American colonies by the Great Britain, the colonies finally declared independence in 1776. To become a stabilized country, the colonies established the Article of Confederation the following year. Americans were upset that under the Article of Confederation their voice was not being heard in the government and their businesses were failing economically. As a result, Daniel Shays led four thousand rebels against the government because of the economic and civil rights injustices. Then the Founding Fathers gathered at the Philadelphia in 1787 to modify the Article of Confederation. Instead of modifying the Article of Confederation, the founding fathers created the Constitution. …show more content…

Under the Article of Confederation each state were able to obtain their own legislation that address to their states citizen’s rights. Contrast to the Constitution, it does not address individual’s rights. Instead, it mainly list legislative powers. The Federalist believed that under these restriction in the Constitution over the government was sufficient enough to protect individual’s rights. Therefore, the anti-federalist proposed the Bill of Rights to be added along with the Constitution. The Anti-federalist felt secure with the Bill of Rights in the Constitution because it protects citizens liberty and freedom. In the end, the founding fathers gathered and agreed to add the Bill of Rights when ratifying the Constitution. Furthermore, Anti-federalists were mainly farmers and they feared that under the Constitution economic policies their business will be endanger. The Constitution was based on Federalist ideas of a strong central government with Hamilton’s economic plan of a national bank and high tariffs.. However, anti-federalist’s leaders, Jefferson and Madison, believed that Hamilton’s economic plan will benefits the affluents. As a result, the anti-federalist disapprove the constitution since it damages their agriculture’s

Show More
Related

Barron V. The Mayor And City Of Baltimore Essay

684 Words | 3 Pages

Yang, Lee PS 13 TTh Citation: Barron v. The Mayor and City of Baltimore (1866) Question before the Court: Does the Fifth Amendment deny the states as well as the national government the right to take private property for public use without justly compensating the property’s owner? Holding: No Opinions: When the Constitution was in the process of being ratified, the Anti-Federalist party rejected to be a part of the new nation because the Anti-Federalists were fearful that the Constitution would permit too powers to the Federal government. In order to pacify the Anti-Federalists party, James Madison then proposed that he will include amendments that would suppress the powers of the federal government and secure the people from the Federal government after the Anti-Federalist party sign to ratify the Constitution.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

357 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were, in short, a hot mess. Nothing could get done; the power dynamics among the thirteen states and the lack of power within the federal government to intervene led to utter disarray. In Document 3, George Washington admits in a letter that the Articles of Confederation were faulty in that they had “too good an opinion of human nature” and the leniency of the Articles had created “thirteen sovereign, independent, disunited States”. The hopes of creating a nation out of the thirteen colonies were destroyed with the Articles of Confederation, and unity could only be achieved through establishing a stronger national government. Document 1 goes farther in describing the perils of a nation split apart at the seams

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

1511 Words | 7 Pages

The federal government does not have full, complete power of the government, due to the fact the federal government has to power to tax, regulate commerce, and put laws into place if and only if laws are so called “necessary and proper.” Another thing was for each branch of government to have their own separation of powers and check and balance other branches of government. Either though, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists did not agree on ideas, the Constitution is a document of the general compromise between the two political parties. The weakness of the Articles of the Confederation was resolved through the compromise of the Federalists and Anti-federalists political

Read More

Confederation Vs Constitution Dbq Essay

933 Words | 4 Pages

When the Constitution was first drafted in Philadelphia, 1787, there was strong opposition to it from the supporters of the Articles of Confederation, America’s first governing document. One of the starkest Anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry, believed the Constitution was a gateway to power for tyrants, similarly, Thomas Jefferson strongly opposed the Constitution’s ratification, believing the Constitution would strip Americans of their freedoms and liberties. Despite their efforts, the Constitution was signed into law, and is now contrarily viewed as that which protects Americans’ rights. The US Constitution is a more democratic document than the Articles of Confederation because under the Articles there was no proportional representation, Americans did not directly vote for any representatives in Congress under the Articles, and the Constitution implemented federal income taxes were able to fund a government that could effectively protect the rights of American citizens.

Read More

Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

827 Words | 4 Pages

Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More

The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More

How Did James Madison Contribute To Government

739 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. Constitution was meant to replaced the Articles of Confederation and provide the people with an insight on all of the rights and for the government to abide by them. However, there were people that did not want the Constitution ratified and there were some who did. The ones who opposed the ratification of the Constitution were referred to as the Antifederalists. They feared that with a strong government, the federal government would have too much power in their hands and would do as they pleased. The Federalists, the ones who supported the Constitution, disagreed with the Anti-Federalists and stated that with a strong federal government, the United States would eventually evolve into a better country in the future.

Read More

Differences Between The Constitution And The Articles Of Confederation

565 Words | 3 Pages

Following British General Charles Cornwallis’ surrender at the Battle of Yorktown in the Revolutionary War, the United States, now no longer under British rule, was in dire need of a new government. Consequently, the Articles of Confederation government was formed in November of 1777, and was finally ratified by the states in 1781. The Articles of Confederation created a loose alignment of sovereign states, where the central government was incredibly weak, with almost no powers. After Shay’s rebellion, in which a group of farmers revolted against the over taxation and underrepresentation of those on the American frontier, and the subsequent failure of the government to do anything, a new, stronger government was created in the form of the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution is a radical departure from the Articles of Confederation because of it centralized the

Read More

Ten Amendments To Write The Bill Of Rights By George Mason

315 Words | 2 Pages

Anti- Federalists thought it was necessary to safeguard individual liberty. The Federalist just wanted laws to be loose and to be molded on the way. Compared to the Anti- Federalists who wanted a strict state government. The Bill of Rights were ratified by the constitution. There were 17 amendments, but the senate only approved 12, and only 10 were ratified

Read More

Individual Rights Dbq

204 Words | 1 Pages

There was a division among the people as to whether or not individual rights should be included in the Constitution. The Anti-Federalist did not want a strong centralized government. Others wanted the guarantee of a written document that protected the freedoms they had fought so hard to earn. The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the right citizens believed belonged to them.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation

729 Words | 3 Pages

Each state that originally operated individually in governmental terms now had the right to speak for themselves in a Continental Congressional setting, which rather than having a president operated with representatives from each state, in which each had an equal voice in the country’s actions such as military actions, foreign affairs, and political motives. The Articles of Confederation possessed many of the governmental powers and limited much of the state’s previously owned rights, although the state’s governments did not become completely powerless. While the Continental Congress became possessive of many governmental powers, the states still individually possessed the rights to levy taxes, draft state military soldiers, and regulate trade within their own state. Although many states, as it would seem, would come to abuse these powers. In this sense, the Articles of Confederation did favor the individual rights of each state by granting rights for their possession apart from the central government’s

Read More

Article Of Confederation Vs Constitution Of 1787

510 Words | 3 Pages

The Article of confederation drafted in 1777. The Arise of war was a top priority however, instead of increasing it decreased by fear of central authority and expansive land claims by states before was it was ratified in 1781. rephase THIS--“It coin money but lacked the ability to levy taxes or regulate commerce”( Foner 195) and issues that influenced A new constitution in 1787.It had a state government, important laws, and guaranteed a few rights for its citizens. There are more significant similarities than differences between the Article of Confederation 1777 and the Constitution of the United States 1787. The people who wrote the Constitution believed it was essential to have a new constitution rather than simply amending the old one.

Read More

What Are The Strengths Of The Articles Of Confederation

1115 Words | 5 Pages

Some people also known as anti-federalists were against changing the form of government because they thought that allowing the states to have more power would be more likely to protect the rights of the people, but by adding the Bill of Rights this would ensure protection of people's basic rights. The Articles of Confederation, also contributed to the idea of the “cabinet departments of treasury, state, and war”(We The

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

647 Words | 3 Pages

In the following paragraph, I will describe to you the different arguments that the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had with ratifying the Constitution. Our Constitution should involve focusing on the common good and civic virtue of the people. There is no need for an overwhelming amount of power provided for the national government to where they make all of the decisions for us. A Bill of Rights would give us such things as the right to speak freely and make our own decisions that we, as a people, think is necessary for the common good. This writing will describe all of these points that support the Anti-Federalists and the reason to reject the new Constitution.

Read More

More about Confederation Vs Constitution Dbq Essay

Open Document