Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

647 Words3 Pages

In the following paragraph, I will describe to you the different arguments that the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had with ratifying the Constitution. Our Constitution should involve focusing on the common good and civic virtue of the people. There is no need for an overwhelming amount of power provided for the national government to where they make all of the decisions for us. A Bill of Rights would give us such things as the right to speak freely and make our own decisions that we, as a people, think is necessary for the common good. This writing will describe all of these points that support the Anti-Federalists and the reason to reject the new Constitution. For this paragraph, I will describe the common good and civic virtue that is needed for a successful and peaceful government, which would most likely a republican government. All of the the people of the U.S. need to have a voice for what is going on with interactions with other countries, declaring war, and who is going to be the next president. There is no reason for a few selected government officials to …show more content…

As I have said before, decisions that should be made by an entire country shouldn’t be made by a few, select people from the government. Those few, select people may be making the wrong decision on whether to go to war or not. All of the people want to make peace, but the government wants to attack them. Although this may be true that it’s important to give the voice to the people more, there also a separation of powers between the branches of government. The legislative branch may have representatives from each state that have an idea for a new law that may make the country better, but the executive branch, which is the president, may veto the law and send it back to the representatives until the president gets his/her way. This new Constitution does give some power to the states but very