ipl-logo

Dbq Essay

426 Words2 Pages

The debate between the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists significantly impacted the ratification of the Constitution. In the 1780’s, there were two opposing groups: the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists. The Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential for a strong central government and the lack of individual rights. On the other hand, Federalists believed in a strong federal government to maintain order and protect the nation. Both these arguments and discussions led to the addition of the Bill of Rights, which addressed the Anti-Federalists' concerns. It is interesting to see the effect these groups had on the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists had multiple issues with the Constitution getting ratified. One objective they were concerned with was the strength and role of the federal government this would create. They thought that the government would eventually take their rights away and abuse the power. Along with that, they assumed that the government would no longer be worried about the smaller states' interests and opinions. The Anti-Federalist states and those concerned included, North Caroline, Rhode Island, Delaware, …show more content…

Which makes sense considering they wrote it. The “Father of the Constitution”, James Madison was one of the main leaders of the Federalist party. This group believed basically the opposite of the Anti-Federalists. They believed that strengthening the role of the government was the best way to “glue” the U.S. together. When the concern for the smaller states was brought up by the Anti feds, they said the Senate represented the states and it would all be well balanced. In addition to this argument, they thought that the states wouldn’t really need to be heavily represented, because the stronger government would “unite” the individual states. Again, notable historical figures were in the group including Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, and George

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Federalist No. 10

827 Words | 4 Pages

These people were known as the Anti-federalist and wrote their own essays as to what they believed, they also looked more to the Articles of Confederation because it did not look at the central government as much. On the other hand, the Federalist approved of the central government and are a strong supporter of the Constitution. The Federalist papers overall created and unified our government, because without the separation of powers we would not have a strong government because every state will act as their own. At the end once the ratification of the

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

1511 Words | 7 Pages

Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

Read More

Ratifying The Constitution Dbq Essay

1210 Words | 5 Pages

The Anti Federalists didn’t want what we have now,they didn’t want the federal government to have and influence over citizens’ lives, they didn’t want the govt to in any way resemble a monarchy because they had just escaped from the corrupt monarchy. They believed that if the power in the country occupied in the people of the various states, then their vision would have a chance of success. Likewise, the Anti Federalist thought there was no bill of rights, so they disliked the constitution. Every constitution should have one for the people, and the government shouldn’t refuse to give on, as shown on Document E. The Letter to James Madison, Objections to the Constitution was written by Thomas Jefferson to explain what he disliked about the constitution to one of the writings, after the constitution was drafted and were awaiting ratification. Thomas Jefferson also asserts that he doesn’t like the fact that there is no rules and regulations in regard to office terms, and how the officers could get re-elected and serve for like, thus, will result with corruption

Read More

Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Essay

900 Words | 4 Pages

Whom wanted to push for strong central government that would unite the states as one large continental nation. Federalists attacked the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and articulated their support for the new Constitution. Arguing that it was a necessary improvement on the ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION. The country's first attempt at unifying the states in a national political

Read More

Constitutional Convention Dbq Essay

629 Words | 3 Pages

Not long after the Constitutional Convention of 1787 had ended and the Constitution had been introduced to the American people for the ratification, there was a debate regarding those who supported the Constitution (Federalists) and those who opposed it (Anti-Federalists). Among those debates, one of the most central debates was whether to unite the thirteen states into a great nation or under the federal government. Perhaps, this question was the reason why some of the delegates kept their mouth shut in Philadelphia. Outstanding delegates such as James Madison and James Wilson had developed a plan that would renovate the American Union from loose independent states to a central nation that under the control of federal government but still

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More

Dbq Essay Against Tyranny

669 Words | 3 Pages

However this idea was eventually scrapped and they wrote a whole new constitution. This constitution would protect America from tyranny, so they could keep a civilized and united country. The Constitution that was made helped defend America from almost all types of tyranny and is still helping us hundreds of years later. One way the Constitution prevented tyranny is by supporting Federalism.

Read More

The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More

How Did The Federalists Encourage The States To Ratifying The Constitution

641 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists, who included leaders like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, argued in favor of a powerful national government that could successfully solve the shortcomings. They maintained that the stability and prosperity of the fledgling country depended on having a single, unified government. In order to explain their positions and convince the states to ratify the Constitution, the Federalists wrote a collection of essays known as the Federalist Papers. However, the Anti-Federalists, who included well-known people like Patrick Henry, voiced worries about the possibility that individual liberties would be violated by a strong, centralized government. They attacked the Constitution for not having a Bill of Rights and for possibly putting an excessive amount of authority in the

Read More

To What Extent Were The Anti-Federalists Really The Bad Guys

1864 Words | 8 Pages

According to Saul Cornell, the struggle between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist over the constitution is one of the “greatest political struggles in American history”. (Cornell, 2012) From what I gather the men who were called the Anti-Federalist are the real Federalist because they cared about the rights of the people and wanted to protect them from an all-powerful government and give more power to the states to care for their own people. They believed that citizens should be included in decisions and that when they weren’t included into decision making procedures the government would become detached from their citizens. (Borowiak, 2007).

Read More

Comparison Of The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

272 Words | 2 Pages

Federalist had even stronger men; Alexander Hamilton, George Washington and Benjamin Franklin. Still, the Constitution was in danger of not being ratified

Read More

Decisions Drafted By The Anti-Federalists And The Ratification Of The Constitution

532 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists supported the Constitution and argued for a strong central government, while the Anti-federalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution. The Federalists supported a powerful executive branch for effective governance

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

553 Words | 3 Pages

After the creation of the Constitution two groups formed and called themselves the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The two groups had very different opinions on the creation of the constitution and disputed matters for a very long time until they came to an agreement. Through out the whole process there were many discussions, meetings and lots of influence from both sides. Eventually the influence of some individuals helped to pass the Constitution, but not before the Anti-Federalists had their say. The Federalists favored the Constitution and was lead by many founders.

Read More

Anti Federalists Dbq Essay

917 Words | 4 Pages

One group, the Federalists, supported Federalism who supported the

Read More

Federalist Party Dbq

746 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist Party was the United States’s first political party that consisted of: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, George Washington, and John Adams, additionally known as the "federalists." These Federalists, predominantly led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, believed that establishing a large national government was necessary to “create a more perfect union”. Thus, this idea resulted in their decision to construct a document to justify government;The Constitution. In order for the Constitution to be ratified, it needed approval from nine of thirteen states. The Federalists supported the Constitution, while another party called, the Anti-Federalists, opposed the Constitution.

Read More

More about Dbq Essay

Open Document