ipl-logo

Federalist Party Dbq

746 Words3 Pages

The Federalist Party was the United States’s first political party that consisted of: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, George Washington, and John Adams, additionally known as the "federalists." These Federalists, predominantly led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, believed that establishing a large national government was necessary to “create a more perfect union”. Thus, this idea resulted in their decision to construct a document to justify government;The Constitution. In order for the Constitution to be ratified, it needed approval from nine of thirteen states. The Federalists supported the Constitution, while another party called, the Anti-Federalists, opposed the Constitution. These Anti-Federalists disagreed …show more content…

45, one of the writers, James Madison, argued that the Union is necessary to the people’s contentment, and that the balance of power between the states and the national government will grant an Ideal happiness for the people. Madison continues to indicate that the most fundamental purpose of government, and of the Constitution, is the people’s happiness, and therefore only a government that promotes this happiness is valid. Quoting, “Were the plan of the Convention adverse to the public happiness, my voice would be, reject the plan. Were the Union itself inconsistent with the public happiness, it would be, abolish the Union.” Thereby explaining that the Constitution prevents this by comprehending the state's’ role in government, while realizing that the national government cannot operate without the state governments, resulting in the state governments being supported and persuaded to agree with the …show more content…

46, written again by James Madison, he emphasizes that the national and state governments are two totally contrastive organizations. By expressing that they are separate but are still able to connect on various platforms, Madison reveals that the power of these governments lie in the people. Furthermore, the people’s instinctive presence will always influence the governments of their respective states, therefore the federal government must, in relation, be exceptionally compliant with the people. As said in true terms, “ The adversaries of the Constitution seem to have lost sight of the people altogether in their reasonings on this subject; and to have viewed these different establishments, not only as mutual rivals and enemies, but as uncontrolled by any common superior in their efforts to usurp the authorities of each other. These gentlemen must here be reminded of their error. They must be told that the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone, and that it will not depend merely on the comparative ambition or address of the different governments, whether either, or which of them, will be able to enlarge its sphere of jurisdiction at the expense of the other. Truth, no less than decency, requires that the event in every case should be supposed to depend on the sentiments and sanction of their common constituents.” The Anti-Federalists feared that the Constitution would give the federal government

Show More
Related
245 Words | 1 Pages

“How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny?” In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. Tyranny, which is a type of government with an absolute ruler, was a fear. For James Madison and the delegates, it was a challenge for them to write the Constitution that could be strong enough to hold the people and the states together without anybody taking over too much control. James Madison’s idea between central and state governments if Federalism (Document A).

Read More
282 Words | 2 Pages

In the summer of 1787, the new government of the United States of America realized that there was a problem with their current government. Many parts of the constitution guards against tyranny because the new constitution has checks and balances, the separation of powers and federalism. The original problem that was called to the attention of the old government was the articles of confederation were very weak, and they needed to create a strong central government. According to document A, a quote by James Madison states, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will controlled by itself.” The central and state government will work together, which shows federalism.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison opposes another paper entitled “Federalist Number 51”. This paper addresses issues on liberty, the structure of the government, and the branches of the government. Madison wanted to assure that all branches have the same amount of power and authority in order to gain independence in a particular branch. As citizens, we are supposed to elect the president, the legislators, and the judges. However, the judicial system does not work that way.

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

The Shay’s Rebellion, as well as economic depression in the United States, opened doors for protests and questions regarding the effectiveness of the Articles of Confederation. The question of whether a powerful central government was necessary to provide citizens fundamental rights caused deliberation among officials. After years of debate, the Articles of Confederation was overturned, resulting in the establishment of the United States Constitution. The Constitution, perceived as a supreme document, served as a solution to the defects of the Confederation. In 1787, the same year the Constitution was ratified, an essay was written, presumably by Robert Yates.

Read More
187 Words | 1 Pages

The article of confederations had many weaknesses, congress did not have enough power under the articles, the states had more power than national government, and the fear many people held of the national government having too much power. The constitution of 1787 was an attempt to resolve the weakness of the articles of confederation. James Madison was an important political thinker. He questioned sovereignty and limiting power. Madison’s answer was that power at all levels of government, was decided upon by the people, therefor the federal government and state government were both sovereign ( Brinkley, 165).

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists supported having a loose constitution, meaning that it could easily be changed. They wanted the congress to easily pass around it to be able to get done what they want to get done. The Democratic-Republicans wanted a strict constitution, meaning that the congress could not easily go around the rules of the document. Alexander Hamilton wanted to get a national bank, but being a Federalist, he couldn’t have a national bank, because it wasn’t mentioned in the constitution. Hamilton argued that it would help trade and economy in the new nation.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Primary source readings 7.4 and 7.5 are two opposite ends of the spectrum , however they are both being written with the same concept in mind; the constitution. In both readings the men express a genuine concern for the people also. Yet, they say completely different things regarding the effect that the constitution will have on the country. In 7.4 James Madison reassures the people of New York that the constitution will keep the branches of government separated and prevent the central government from becoming too powerful. This is the exact fear that the American people have regarding the constitution.

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

In Federalists No. 10, one of the strongest pieces of the Federalists Papers that pushed and helped in the ratification of the constitution, James Madison argues factions, the threat they pose and his ideas of how to secure an outcome; and with the influence of John Locke successfully creates a document that encouraged the acceptance of the Constitution. Madison wanted a nation under one republic, he wanted to guarantee a strong union, one that no enemy could conquer whether it be an enemy country or a majority of the people right in America’s backyard. Locke also believed a strong nation required obedience from all and had very specific understandings of what man and governments roles were from which one can tell Madison drew from on his understanding

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

I would choose to be an Anti-Federalist because they did not loathe federalism, they just had felt the need to make some improvements. They had strived to put more power into the hands of the states. As the Anti-Federalists believes, I strongly agree with the constitution but I truly believe the bill of rights which was added later was very crucial to the U.S Constitution. The bill of rights has a big part in the citizen’s personal rights that people have all the time. I honestly can’t fathom what our country would be like if we did not have these rights being put into place.

Read More
1175 Words | 5 Pages

On a humid summer’s day, in 1787, 55 delegates traveled from 12 different states to meet in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation. Although they knew that the Articles of Confederation wouldn’t hold, they never intended on replacing the entirety of the Articles. The Articles of Confederation were a form of government that was swiftly created, during the Revolutionary War. It led to a central government that lacked power to do simple tasks. The delegates seeked to create a new central government that was powerful enough to lead the country, but wasn’t ruled by one person or a group of people.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

In 1783, the Treaty of Paris was signed and America was declared it’s own nation after years of war. America was fighting for it’s freedom because they had a tyrant ruler, King George III, who didn’t give them their rights. According to James Madison, a tyrant is one, few, or many people who abuse their given power. Originally, the framers made a weak national government, the Articles of Confederation, because they were afraid of a tyrant controlling them again. The Articles didn’t have an executive leader, or court system for the states.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

James Madison argued that the power of both the state and federal government comes from its citizens and because of this there can be sovereignty on both a state and federal level. The Constitution also set out to solve this question by dividing the power between the state and federal government. The Constitution would be the “law of the land” but this would not impede state level powers or laws. Instead the federal government would oversee federal level concerns like taxing and creating an army. There were still many who felt that a large government would lead to a corrupt government with control in the hands of only a few.

Read More
1088 Words | 5 Pages

The framers were concerned that the current federal government under the Articles of Confederation did not possess enough power in order to preserve the union; therefore, the constitution must provide the federal government with enough power to serve its duty while still preserving power in the state governments. In Federalist Paper No. 1, Hamilton is urging that under the new constitution the “utility of the union” created by a stronger federal government will help to ensure the vitality of the states as it offers protection of liberty (Hamilton et al. 30). Madison argued in Federalist Paper No. 10 that in a larger government the impacts of factions will be lessened because the people will defeat “sinister views by regular vote” (Hamilton et al. 75). He also states in Federalist Paper No. 39 that the ratifying of the constitution creates a government that is “neither wholly national nor wholly federal” (Hamilton et al. 242). The idea of these three Federalist Papers that were written by the framers of the constitution is that the federal government has to have a higher share of power than was present in the Articles of Confederation in order to strengthen the union.

Read More
1651 Words | 7 Pages

This belief in a more powerful national government and its ability to unite the states together to become a collective country centered on its ability to solve internal and external affairs. Prior to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation’s glaring weakness included the limited powers of Congress such as its inability to tax or regulate commerce, no national military, and no executive or judiciary branch (Baker 9/29/15). With the Constitution granting the increase in the power of the national government, it sought to solve these deficiencies. Highlighting the need to proliferate the power of Congress, The Federalist 51 by James Madison wrote that “in republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates” (Madison 1788, 60). The Federalists believed in authorizing the legislative branch the most power due to it being the voice of the people.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Federalist V. Anti-Federalist Federalist and Anti-Federalist were two factions most commonly known for debating during the transition from the Articles of Confederation of the United States Constitution. Both sides debated many things, including the liberties of a citizen in the United States. I believe that the Anti-Federalist 's ideals best preserved the liberties of Americans. The Anti-Federalists believed that there were three defects of a large republic. First, only a small republic can enjoy a voluntary attachment of the people to the government and a voluntary obedience to the laws (Storing, 16).

Read More

More about Federalist Party Dbq

Open Document