ipl-logo

Democratic-Republicans Vs Federalist Viewpoints

702 Words3 Pages

Even way back when the country was founded, there was a definite split between two political perspectives. The Federalists wanted to abolish the Democratic-Republicans, and vice versa. The huge differences that divided the two parties include, Who the country should be ruled by, state power in the union, how the constitution should be applied, alliance with countries in Europe, banks, and trade. Let's start with some basic background information. The Federalists were people who thought that the quarreling states could come together and make a perfect republic. James Madison is probably the most well-known Federalist of his time. The Democratic-Republicans supported to have states have their own power, and was led pretty much by Thomas Jefferson. …show more content…

The Federalists thought that the states should have little power, with the extra power given to the central government. The Democratic-Republicans supported having states that have nearly equal power to the main government. Nowadays, the Democratic-Republicans won out on this topic.
Probably the biggest difference between them is how much power the constitution has over the government. The Federalists supported having a loose constitution, meaning that it could easily be changed. They wanted the congress to easily pass around it to be able to get done what they want to get done. The Democratic-Republicans wanted a strict constitution, meaning that the congress could not easily go around the rules of the document.
Alexander Hamilton wanted to get a national bank, but being a Federalist, he couldn’t have a national bank, because it wasn’t mentioned in the constitution. Hamilton argued that it would help trade and economy in the new nation. But being as bitter rivals as the two sides were, his idea ran into heavy opposition by the opposing party. Hamilton argued the in the elastic clause allowed them to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper” for carrying out powers. Since carrying out taxes was one of the topics covered in the constitution, Congress could set up a bank to help with collecting taxes. After much debate, Hamilton won his case, and the first Bank of the United States opened in 1791.to help the ecomomy, and

Show More
Related
95 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists favored a strong central government while the Republicans draw attention to the states’ rights. The Republican Party supported France while Federalists supported England. The Republicans supported France because they supported America in its fight for independence. Also, France had the best navy and Republicans respected the strength of their navy. Hamilton supported England because they had more goods and services where they needed to continue trade routes.

Read More
292 Words | 2 Pages

Each party believed that the other was endangering the Constitution and the American republic. The Democratic-Republicans thought they were saving the nation from monarchy and oppression. They argued, again and again, that the Alien and Sedition Acts supported by the Federalists violated the Bill of Rights. The Federalists thought that the nation was

Read More
1040 Words | 5 Pages

One concerned foreign policy, while the other concerned the rights of citizens. Adams wanted to follow in Washington’s footsteps and not go to war with Britain, instead to be neutral for war and decrease foreign intervention. Federalists, in general, were men of wealth and position. They did not believe in democracy, rule by the people. For this reason, they strongly opposed the revolution in France.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Federalists were mostly merchants, bankers manufacturers, and wealthy farm owners. They basically owned land or some type of property and were well-educated. Most of these people lived in urban areas. Anti-Federalists were mostly artisans, shopkeepers, frontier settlers, and poor farmers. They were mostly uneducated and illiterate and most of them lived in rural areas.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

A Federalist is a person who wanted a strong central government. After that he became a Democratic-Republican. The Democratic-Republican party was organized by Thomas Jefferson and James Maddison. He was elected president in 1824 against 4 other people. He got elected on a deal that was supported by Henry Clay who was the speaker of the house.

Read More
227 Words | 1 Pages

After the American Revolution, two political parties by the people in an effort to form a government of their own. Anti-Federalists wanted small local government and Federalists wanted large Federal centered Government. Anti-Federalists are afraid of a strong government because “when the people fear the government, there is tyranny… [and] when the government fears the people there is liberty” (Doc B).

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More
139 Words | 1 Pages

To compare and contrast the differences between the Federalists and the Democratic-republicans? Is by the federalists and the democratic-republicans both have people that put rules down too Rule by the wealthy class and Rule by the people but they are a different type of people like the wealthy class and the normal people. Another compare things they both have is that they both have strong governments but Alexander and Thomas had different governments like Alexander had a strong federal government and Thomas had a strong state government. Also, Alexander and Thomas had an alliance but with different people like Alexander had an alliance with British and Thomas had an alliance with the French. But an overall, they both had banks but, they both

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

The two parties were the Republicans and the Federalists. The Republicans hoped government took a lesser approach to everyday life. Its individualistic perspective includes living in moderation, be tough, don’t spend more than you have to, and be honest. These lofty goals and ambitions were reasonable in the late 1700’s, early 1800’s, however, now most

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

The federalists believed in a national bank while the democratic republicans thought the better solution was many state banks. The federalists party was lead by Alexander Hamilton and the republicans by Thomas jefferson. These were the first political parties in the new country. The federalists wanted to have a national bank runned by the government.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

the federalists favored strong, centralized government. They advocated regulation or foreign trade and interstate trade, because for some reason they did not like that. The federalists created national bank that favored more the businessman in the north than in the south, yet they promoted industry and manufacturing. Next, the republicans ideas and in

Read More
1282 Words | 6 Pages

Federalists: Believed that representative governments could be easily undermined. They believed that rich and people with high status should control the govt. They wanted to expand authority over the states. After the defeat of John Adams in 1800, they never held presidency again & their presence began to

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

That’s a huge difference between these two parties except they both created systems in order to ensure the government couldn’t possess too much power. The federalists created checks and balances which split the powers of the government equally therefore no one party had too much overbearing powers. Federalists created this to ensure the government couldn’t become tyrannous. On the other hand the Anti-Federalists fought for a bill of rights therefore ensuring their rights couldn’t be robbed by a tyrannous government. Both sides were scared to trust a government after the strict British rule while one was more willing to make a new government than the other.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

One group was the Federalists who supported more authority given to the central government and the idea that the central government has the power to implement and enforce any law that they felt was necessary to perform its duties. The other group was the Republicans who believed that the states should have the most authority and that the central government should mediate between the states. Their viewpoints differed on a variety of things which helped to shape our government even more and set precedents on when the government should intervene in domestic and foreign disputes. The

Read More
1696 Words | 7 Pages

Something as vast and great as the United States of America could never have come about because of one man or one group. This required the amazing effort of many people and organizations that would ultimately create one of the most unique and greatest empires to ever grace the earth. One of these would be the Federalists Party. The Federalists party advocated for a more unified government and more government regulation that would help shape the country and leave a lasting impression. Alexander Hamilton along with James Madison and John Jay developed 85 essays in support of ratifying the constitution that appeared in newspapers and were eventually gathered as a book under the pen name Publius and was called The Federalist in 1788.

Read More

More about Democratic-Republicans Vs Federalist Viewpoints

Related Topics

Open Document