ipl-logo

Individual Rights Dbq

204 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Constitutions of usa essay

In 1787 delegates from thirteen states drafted the Constitution which set up a form of self-government with a system of checks and balances. However, the document did not include individual rights which proved to be a hindrance to its ratification. The Constitution stated what government could do, but it did not provide provisions for what government could not do. There was a division among the people as to whether or not individual rights should be included in the Constitution. The Anti-Federalist did not want a strong centralized government. Others wanted the guarantee of a written document that protected the freedoms they had fought so hard to earn. The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the right citizens believed belonged to them.
Show More
Related
923 Words | 4 Pages

Because of this, a new constitution had to be made. The Constitution was written in the city of Philadelphia, in May 1787, by 55 delegates from 12 of the 13 states. The Constitution guarded against tyranny through federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the Great Compromise. The Constitution guarded against tyranny through federalism.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution guarded against Tyranny by creating Federalism, so the states didn't control the same power. They created three branches of government Legislative, Judicial, and Executive. The United States Constitution was constructed on September 17th, 1787. The constitution was written in Philadelphia. The purpose of the constitution was to limit the power of the government.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, the anti-federalist proposed the Bill of Rights to be added along with the Constitution. The Anti-federalist felt secure with the Bill of Rights in the Constitution because it protects citizens liberty and freedom. In the end, the founding fathers gathered and agreed to add the Bill of Rights when ratifying the Constitution. Furthermore, Anti-federalists were mainly farmers and they feared that under the Constitution economic policies their business will be endanger.

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

Since the creating of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the federal government has grown in its influence over states by several Supreme Court decisions. The Constitution was established to create a limited role of the federal government over the states. The Bill of Rights was included in the Constitution to protect individual rights from an overreaching federal government. It was designed to be a malleable document that has been amended twenty-seven times. At the time of its inception, the Constitution was designed for minimal interference by the federal government for private citizens.

Read More
375 Words | 2 Pages

The United States Constitution was created to define the powers and limitations of the government. It replaced the Articles of the Confederation, and was ratified by all 13 states in 1787 (American Government, n.d.). The ratification of the Constitution was not without opposition, and the government was split into two groups: federalists, and anti-federalists. The federalist group believed that a national governing body, ruled by the elite class was necessary. Antifederalists, on the other hand, believed that state governments should have more say, and that the government should be run by ordinary people (American Government, n.d.).

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

The constitution was written on May 25, 1787, but there was one problem, the writers of the constitution had to find a way to guard against tyranny. some of their solutions were, Federalism, Separation of powers, Checks and balances, and Balancing powers between the largest states and the smaller states(Large VS Small states). These were the ways the constitution guarded against tyranny. The first guard against tyranny in the constitution is federalism. Federalism is the separation of powers between the Central Government, and the State Government.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

Read More
239 Words | 1 Pages

The arguments between the Federalist and Massachusetts Anti-Federalist caused by Federalist paper #84 would have been very difficult to resolve without modifications to the items that were to be included in the Constitution like the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights were considered to be relevant and deleterious to the Constitution by Federalist Alexander Hamilton, who stated in the essay Federalist Paper #84 that the Bill of Rights is “...not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous.” In addition Hamilton pointed out that many natural rights, like the right to redress grievances, were already implied in the body of the Constitution, therefore no further listing was necessary. However, Anti-Federalist counteracted

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

When our founding fathers first created the Constitution it was found unworkable and had to have some changes before the ratification. In that process people began to have some differences such as the Federalist saw that the enhanced Constitution alone would protect all basic human rights. While Antifederalist saw that we needed an extra addition to the document that would genuinely give the basic rights, liberties, and limit the government from denouncing these rights and liberties from the people. The Bill of Rights was a necessary addition that has and will continue to protect the people from injustice in the government with the help of the Supreme Court.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

The Anti-Federalists that opposed the constitution believed that the constitution would give too much power to the government. The Anti-Federalists argued that a powerful government would become tyrannical like the British monarchy that they worked so hard to escape from. This led them to create The Bill of Rights. Today’s government has similar problems. Nowadays some politicians believe that The Bill of Rights is a living document that can be changed or manipulated to “better fit” the era that we live in.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

The Antifedera records stressed that a solid national government would manhandle their rights similarly that the British government had. To relieve their feelings of dread, the Federalists consented to make the Bill of Rights. These alterations to the Constitution explained what rights the general population had that the national government couldn't meddle with. For instance, it said that the national governmer couldn't encroach on individuals' rights to the right to speak freely or religion. The Bill of Rights likewise said that any rights not given to Congress or taken from the states had a place with the states.

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

Government holds our rights like we are babies they use us and us them against us. Thats the question what are our rights as u.s citizens and what government protects them. I’d say we have no rights because in document D it says “Man is born free,and everywhere he is in chains.” ( Rousseau doc D.) Rousseau in document D explains in the sentence is that when man is born they think they are “Free” when really they are not and they are locked in chains working for the government.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

The Federalists believe that there is no need for a Bill of Rights to be written in the Constitution. Unalienable rights, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, and all rights and responsibilities were already spelled out in detail in the Constitution. By creating a Bill of Rights, it would put too much power in the hands of the states; which would just create another confederacy type of government with little power to act. If each state had its own government, they would be very weak and they would probably be eliminated within a year.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective

Read More

More about Individual Rights Dbq

Related Topics

Open Document