More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentation and persuasion essay on vaccines
Persuasive vaccination
Argumentation and persuasion essay on vaccines
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentation and persuasion essay on vaccines
Petts and Niemeyer explore the controversy debate on what affects people from not getting their children vaccinated. They did a poll on who gets their children vaccinated and who does not get their children vaccinated. One factor Petts and Niemeyer discuss is why people are second guessing getting vaccinations for their children. The media has presented information, which led to false reports, although parents are acting upon these messages in which change their beliefs in vaccinations. Media has since affected the idea of vaccinations, parents are beginning to look into the vaccinations and predict if they will be mandatory or not for their children.
However, the anti-vax lobbies and groups believe that the “risks of vaccine outweigh the benefits, despite what science says” Mrs Suthers said.. “They have a strong belief that the pharma industry or the government is out to get them” she added. Ms Stephanie Messenger talks of her concerns of vaccinating children in her recent book “Melanie’s Marvellous
Simon's argument is well-supported and he provides compelling examples of how Aristotle's philosophy can be applied to the issue of vaccines. One potential weakness of Simon's article is that it may be difficult for readers who are not familiar with Aristotle's philosophy to fully understand his argument. Additionally, Simon's article focuses primarily on the ethical issues at stake in the anti-vaccine movement, and does not provide as much information about the scientific evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of vaccines. While Simon's argument is compelling, it may be less persuasive to readers who are skeptical of vaccines due to misinformation or conspiracy theories. Simon uses Aristotle's philosophy to argue that the anti-vaccine movement is motivated by a flawed understanding of individual autonomy, and that policymakers and public health officials must take a nuanced approach to addressing vaccine hesitancy.
In his book, Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All, Paul A. Offit, M.D. presents us with a thoroughly in-depth look behind the veil of the vaccine controversy. Specifically here in the United States. Offit starts us off with the history of vaccinations giving insights into not just their creation but the controversy that has surrounded them since the beginning. We learn how these questions around safety and personal rights started and who have been the major decision makers in history. We hear about the groups and people that support vaccinations and those that do not.
“A Pox Upon Their Houses” Analysis Essay In the article “A Pox Upon Their Houses”, author Amy Haywood Hughes argues that parents should have their children vaccinated to lower their risk of getting chicken pox. Amy supports her opinion with many examples, and fact within the article. She starts off her article with a background story of her life and previous events that have happened before. Within the article she continues to inform people in how important it is for the children .
Requiring vaccinations is a highly debatable topic in the United States today. An article by Ronald Bayer, “The continuing tensions between individual rights and public health,” is one of the most reliable sources in the case study. The author has a PhD from the University of Chicago and focuses his research on issues of social justice and ethical matters. Bayer has also previously been a consultant to the World Health Organization on ethical issues related to public health. This makes him very knowledgeable about the topic and a highly credible source.
She believes mandatory vaccination is ‘a human rights issue and not a pro or anti-vaccination debate.’ The use of language and written style is very simple yet sophisticated. It is easy to understand and follow through as technical words are not present in the article to
Patrick Stokes’ argument provides a brief example of how the belief that everyone is entitled to their own opinion creates problems within our society. In that, just because you are entitled to an opinion, does not mean you are entitled for your opinions to be treated as “serious candidates for the truth” (Stokes 2012). He specifically focuses on how a non-expert might coin the phrase, as a final objection against an ‘expert.’ As an example, he uses the debate surrounding vaccinations and autism. Here, Stokes argues that although this has been disproved by scientific experts, people who are completely uneducated on the topic will still shout back their opinion, because of the existing conflated sense of entitlement.
One of the previously mentioned arguments for anti-vaccers was the argument that the vaccine would cause teenagers to act more immorally. This is proven to be false when Dr. Saslow, the lead author of the cancer society’s, updated guidelines and firmly states that there is “no direct connection between the vaccine and sexual activity and no reason to suggest one.” Brody’s mention of the famous doctor effectively persuades the reader to see the truth behind the research. The mention of parents being concerned about the effects these vaccines is considered a rhetorical cannon of relationship. The supposed relationship between the vaccine and physical consequences encountered after being vaccinated is a the main elements behind the anti-vaccers argument.
The Pew Research Center reported in July 2015 that 68 percent of white, 66% of black, and 75% of Hispanic parents believe that all children should be required to be vaccinated (Funk & Rainie, 2015, p. 16). As the Pew Research Center shows, “There are no significant differences in views about this issue by race and ethnicity” (Funk & Rainie, 2015, p. 17), which leads to the audience having similar expectations of the rhetoric and provides an advantage for the rhetor in addressing all
The issue that my persuasive presentation focused on is if children should be vaccinated. My presentation is intended to be viewed by parents and future parents. After researching the topic, I chose to argue the point that parents should vaccinate their children, with the supporting arguments ‘immunizations are safe and effective’, ‘do not cause autism or lower the immune system’ and parents should immunize their children to prevent the spread of immunization-prevented-diseases and to protect children who may not be able to receive the appropriate immunizations. I have chosen to begin my presentation with ‘Despite the large amount of scientific data urging parents to have their children immunized there continues to be parents who are falling into the bottomless pit of misinformation on the Internet and are discarding to immunize their children’, in order to engage my audience. I believe this strategy would be appropriate as it may make parents begin to think that they may be doing something incorrect in not immunizing their children and therefore read further into my piece.
For example, some parents are reluctant to vaccinate their children against diseases like Hemophilic Influenza if they won’t be attending daycare. While daycares require this vaccine, this deadly disease is a threat to all children, even if they do not attend daycare (Bronfin 3). People who oppose mandatory vaccinations for public school children point out parents concerned with their children being around unvaccinated children could move their child to a private institution requiring immunization (Murphy 2). This reasoning would only add extra stress for families trying to find schools for their children and could cost parents more money than just being able to send their child to a free public school without fear. The next most controversial concern parents have regards the ingredients in some vaccinations.
Some examples are that for the past several years we have heard that polio vaccine lead lymphoma and caused the AIDS epidemic, and the MMR vaccine lead to Crohn’s disease and autism. These theories, however have not bothered themselves with facts, that might be fair in the time of chiropractic’s infancy, but now, in the 20th century it is not acceptable. The lack of true information about vaccination is a struggle to the vaccination policy. A research by Kennedy et al. shows that health professionals consider that girls are empowered to make decisions about the HPV vaccine for themselves, some of them decide not to take the vaccine for the lack of information.
Every person has the right, but if they are going to harm the rest of the human race just because they do not vaccinations I do not agree with that. I do believe that vaccinations are a good thing and should be
Modern medicine provides people with the ability to protect themselves from the world’s most fatal diseases. Merely a century ago, it was not uncommon for a child to die as a result of diseases such as polio, pertussis, and tuberculosis. Today, it is highly unlikely for a person to contract these diseases, let alone die from them. However, refusal of vaccinations has been increasing throughout the years due to the anti-vaccination movement. This movement declares mandatory vaccines unconstitutional and vaccinations overall as the cause of autism.
