“A Pox Upon Their Houses” Analysis Essay
In the article “A Pox Upon Their Houses”, author Amy Haywood Hughes argues that parents should have their children vaccinated to lower their risk of getting chicken pox. Amy supports her opinion with many examples, and fact within the article. She starts off her article with a background story of her life and previous events that have happened before. Within the article she continues to inform people in how important it is for the children . Amy goes on to explain why she is trying to persuade her readers to follow through with getting their children vaccinated for the sickness.
The article begins with Hughes telling her story about her and her family’s previous encounter with the chickenpox. In Amy’s early years vaccinations for chickenpox did not exist. Fortunately when she had her children in the 1990’s the vaccination had come about. However her children still caught the chickenpox through a child from their school. Parents happened to be really skeptical about having their kids vaccinated. They thought that the vaccine could cause their children to have autism. Hughes thinks that it would be best for parents to have their children vaccinated. For example she says “ This is not about politics; this is about public health. Vaccine saves lives”. She clearly feels that children are at higher
…show more content…
In her article she says “unvaccinated people can spread the measles to babies who are to young to be vaccinated and to children who cannot be vaccinated due to medical reasons “. Also she says to her readers “Since the MMR vaccine is only 97 percent effective, vaccinated people are at risk as well.” These facts and examples help the reader understand more about why Amy feels parents should vaccinate their children and also gives meaning to why they should follow-through with