ipl-logo

Antonin Scalia Case Summary

2431 Words10 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Planned parenthood v. casey for men

It became apparent to the United States Supreme Court Justices, that the newly appointed colleague, Justice Antonin Scalia, brought a legal philosophy which would “test the courts” in the interpretation of the United States Constitution and how it should apply the law to a variety of landmark cases. Antonin Scalia made no apologies for his legal philosophy of “originalism,” despite oppositions from other Court Justices, his critics, and the public. Scalia believed that the United States Constitution should strictly be interpreted in terms of what the Founding Fathers had meant when the Constitution was written originally (Ring 107). Antonin Scalia received his A.B. from the prestigious, Georgetown University and the University of Fribourg, …show more content…

Casey. Mainly, Sandra Day O’Connor delivered a ruling that a new standard would be followed. This was known as the “undue burden” standard (Perry). The constitutionality of each of the state abortion laws would be determined by the degree of what would be measured, as a "burden" based on each case for any woman, seeking an abortion (NCHLA). This would mean that if the "burden" was "undue," for any reason, then the law would be then deemed unconstitutional (NCHLA).
This ruling was intrinsically unlike any others because the Supreme Court had never amenably recognized Sandra Day O'Connor's standards from the beginning. As a result, of the Court's incapability to meaningfully articulate a sound constitutional basis, mixed with the Justice’s inability to agree on the traditional standard of review, had caused the lower court to have no choice but to appeal to a single justice's personal standard (NCHLA).
Subsequently, the Casey decision activated an instinctive witty response from Scalia. He wasted no time in giving his opinion. Scalia took the decision apart point by point in a strong and swift fashion. He believed that when the issue of abortion is needing resolution, it should be done by way of a consensus (NCHLA). According to a the NCHLA published a web article titled, “Justice Antonin Scalia Dissents from the Court's Abortion Jurisprudence,” in the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, he

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Gideon V. Wainwright

1023 Words | 5 Pages

When people think of how government works, unless they’ve taken a government class, they usually think of Congress making laws and the President doing pretty much everything else. No one pays much attention to the Supreme Court unless there is a landmark case or something else to grab the news — like the recent death of Justice Antonin Scalia. But the Supreme Court does much more than you’d think regarding keeping the political machine running like a well-oiled … machine. Through not only interpretation of the law, but also judicial activism, the Supreme Court shows it can have as much influence over the laws of the land as either of the other branches of the federal government. In this paper, I will analyze the decision-making methods of the Court using the cases of Gideon v. Wainwright and Betts v. Brady.

Read More

Setonia's Abortion Laws Summary

104 Words | 1 Pages

A recent federal lawsuit has been filed by the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) challenging the constitutionality of three provisions of the Setonia’s Abortion Laws. The three provisions ACLU are challenging are as follows (McCauliff): • Law which prevents state health officials from renewing or issuing licenses to abortion clinics located with 2000 feet of an elementary school (McCauliff). • Law which requires physicians performing abortions to complete 10 hours annually of continuing medical education on abortion procedures (McCauliff). • Law which requires abortion providers to give every patient a copy of her medical records, regardless of whether the patient requests such records (McCauliff).

Read More

Summary Of Chief Justice By Ed Cray

766 Words | 4 Pages

On a lesser note, Cray also examines the dichotomy between Warren’s republican background and his role in the development of progressive legislation as Chief Justice. In these controversial cases, Warren asked himself ‘what is right’ before he asked ‘what is the legal precedent.’ Cray craftily points out Warren’s seemingly paradoxical characteristics and views and explains them with great

Read More

Antonin Scalia Textualism Summary

1541 Words | 7 Pages

Textualism, as Antonin Scalia describes it, is inconsistent in its nature. While he first claims that a good textualist would never interpret the law with the legislator’s intent in mind, Scalia later violates his own convictions by allowing for corrections of Scrivener’s errors. In principle, correcting Scrivener’s errors requires the judge to think about what the original writer meant to say with the statute, not the literal meaning of the text. This may mean adding a single additional word to the statute, but something as deceptively simple as one word could have drastic effects on the meaning of the law. Therefore, Scalia cannot claim to account for Scrivener’s errors while also chastising methods of interpretation that consider what the

Read More

A Brief Note On The Supreme Court Case University Of California V. Bakke

820 Words | 4 Pages

On June 27, 1978, the Supreme Court was divided between two different viewpoints. Four justices only focused on the “Statutory issue of Title VI and found for Bakke authorizing his admission to the school, because the quota in the university’s admission program had obviously excluded Bakke because of his race” (McBride). They recognized that the University was at fault and Bakke should be admitted. The other four justices centralized on the constitutional issues, the violation of the Equal Protection Clause, and justified that the admission process of the university wasn’t intended

Read More

Antonin Scalia Research Paper

722 Words | 3 Pages

One of his most famous dissenting opinions as of late is his decision to vote against same sex marriage in which he stated that decision wasn’t really a Supreme court one and that it didn’t really relate to the constitution. another dissenting opinion he gave was one on not giving the death penalty in which he said that he believed that it is up to the Congress or Legislatures of the fifty states to decide whether or not they want the death penalty or

Read More

Mapp Vs Ohio Case Study

1872 Words | 8 Pages

56. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989): The Court upheld Missouri restrictions on abortions that “public employees and public facilities were not to be used in performing or assisting abortions unnecessary to save the mother 's life; encouragement and counseling to have abortions was prohibited; and physicians were to perform viability tests upon women in their twentieth (or more) week of pregnancy.” It was a fractured decision that seemed to contradict Roe v. Wade but the court decided to not revisit any parts of Roe v. Wade after this case. The Missouri restrictions did not violate the right to privacy or the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Read More

Sandra Day O Connor's Life And Accomplishments

930 Words | 4 Pages

In fact, many of her decisions were for a swing vote to keep the balance between conservative and liberals. Since she took part on various liberals’ cases, most republicans were disappointed at her, but as Viet Dinh (Georgetown Law, 2015), on biography declared that O’Connor judged cases individually, according to facts not to personal ideas. As for the case Mississippi v. Hogan, per Biography (2017), a female state run nursing school opposed to admit a male student, O’Connor rightly voted per the majority writing that the school stereotyped the nursing job to be just for women. Also in 1990, in the case Planned Parenthood v. Casey, O’Connor supported abortion rights after marriage as a woman right. Furthermore, in Handi v. Rumsfeld (2004) O’Connor voted with the majority on due process rights for American citizen that are considerate “enemy combatant” by the executive branch.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Roe Vs. Wade

1025 Words | 5 Pages

Prior to the case it was the state that determined the legality of abortions. Jane Roe, (alias), was an unmarried and pregnant Texas citizen in 1970. She wanted to have an abortion, but Texas abortion law made it a felony to abort a fetus unless “on medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother.” Roe filed suit against Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas to challenge the law outlawing abortion. At the time, many states had outlawed abortion except in cases where the mother’s life was in danger.

Read More

Macalia Dissent Case Summary

1849 Words | 8 Pages

Americans are proud of their history and traditions so things like, “debate over same-sex marriage displayed American democracy at its best” and in reference to the 14th Amendment “bears the endorsement of a long tradition of open, widespread, and unchallenged use dating back to the Amendment’s ratification” would strike pride in their hearts. People love to do things the “good ol’ American way” and when that is threatened they become defensive. Scalia argues that with their decision the Court is changing the way our system of government works and with this he could expect the people to become defensive and want to be aware of future decisions that could do the same. Scalia wrote about the judicial claim to legislative power, “a claim fundamentally at odds with our system of government” and “government that makes the People subordinate to. . . nine unelected lawyers does not deserve to be called a democracy” (5).

Read More

Roe V. Wade Pros And Cons

562 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, the supreme court ruling in 1973 had made an irrational decision during the Roe v. Wade trial. In addition to abortions not being included in the constitution, “the justices wrote because it destroys what other court decisions call “fetal life”’ (McKeown). Now with this convincing the empathetic people about killing unborn children, they were able to move on in their process of abolishing abortion legalization. This caused the fight in overturning Roe v. Wade and had successfully done so on June 24, 2022, in a six to three

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Pro-Choice And Pro Choice

1888 Words | 8 Pages

“On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Roe v. Wade, a challenge to a Texas statute that made it a crime to perform an abortion unless a woman’s life was at stake. The case had been filed by “Jane Roe,” an unmarried woman who wanted to safely and legally end her pregnancy. Siding with Roe, the court struck down the Texas law. In its ruling, the court recognized for the first time that the constitutional right to privacy “is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy” (Roe v. Wade, 1973).

Read More

Roe V. Wade Essay

1555 Words | 7 Pages

The Right to Abortion On January 22, 1973, in a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down it’s landmark decision in the case of Roe v. Wade, which recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians (Planned Parenthood). There are many moments in history when Roe v. Wade has been so close to being overturned, yet it is still in place. Abortion should stay legal, or not overturned, for the health of women everywhere. First, this important case took place at the time of abortion being illegal in most states, including Texas, where Roe v. Wade began.

Read More

Conservative And Liberal View Of Abortion

1027 Words | 5 Pages

The Court ruled that the states were forbidden from outlawing any aspect of abortion performed during the first trimester of pregnancy, could only enact abortion regulations reasonably related to maternal health in the second and third trimesters, and could enact abortion laws protecting the life of the fetus only in the third trimester (McBride). At the time Roe was decided, most states severely restricted or banned the practice of abortion. My thoughts on the abortion debate fall in between conservative and liberal views. I believe that women have aright to have an abortion under certain circumstances. If the mother needs an abortion to live it should be legal.

Read More

Women's Reproductive Rights

1329 Words | 6 Pages

Women’s rights have been a long struggle in America’s legal system, as well as in the religious world, for many decades and women continue to have challenges, concerns, and struggles today. Fighting for what is best for their bodies such as a woman’s right to contraceptives to control whether she will get pregnant or not was not ideal for religious and personal reasons but would find a worthy advocate in a woman who would dedicate her life for women’s reproductive rights. The right for a woman to have an abortion became a legal battle that went all the way to the Supreme Courts in a very well-known case. It has always been a double standard in what was right and wrong, moral or immoral, towards women than men. A man was looked at with respect

Read More

More about Antonin Scalia Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document