ipl-logo

Antony's Ethos In Julius Caesar

627 Words3 Pages

William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar is about Caesar's life, his assassination, and its aftermath. During his funeral both Mark Antony and Brutus give speeches with each using rhetorical devices to persuade the Roman audience, Brutus using more logos, and Antony using more pathos. In the end Antony’s speech was more persuasive than Brutus’ because of his appeal to the audience's emotions. While Brutus is opening up his speech he says “Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses, that you may the better judge” (3.2.16-17). In this line he appeals to the audience’s logic by telling them to judge him based on their wisdom, and to awaken more of their senses to more accurately judge him, and with this showing them that he trusts them to come to the correct conclusion with the knowledge he gives. A bit later into his speech, Brutus says “If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free …show more content…

Brutus, throughout his speech, focuses too much on justifying his actions, while Antony focuses on angering the audience and turning them against the conspirators. Antony also is able to connect on a personal level with the audience by saying, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar” (3.2.106), rather than on a patriotic level like Brutus does. They both use repetition in different ways to prove something to the audience, Brutus repeats that he loves Caesar, and that he was a good man, trying to show that audience that he didn’t kill Caesar because he hated him. Antony however uses repetition to antagonize Brutus without saying it out right, by repeating that Brutus is an honorable man and changing the way he says it each time, it causes the audience to rethink their opinion on

Show More
Related
592 Words | 3 Pages

Scene two of act three in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar shows two orators, consisting of Mark Antony and Brutus, giving speeches to a crowd at Caesar’s funeral. Both of them want to convince the audience that their position on the assassination of Julius Caesar is correct. The two both use rhetorical devices to backup their positions. In the end, Antony is victorious. Even though the two speeches have similarities, they also have many differences that made Antony’s speech just that little bit better.

Read More
235 Words | 1 Pages

16) Thomas Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, more power to the states, and supported trade with the French. When Hamilton issued the idea of a National Bank, Jefferson opposed it, saying that it was not a specific power given directly in the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson, however, changed his views on strict and loose interpretation of the Constitution when he purchased Louisiana territory. He used a loose interpretation of the Constitution and used treaty-making powers to seal the deal with France. Another principle was the power to the states.

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

When talking about the differences between the two speeches the main difference is how each person uses logos, ethos, and pathos. When Brutus says his speech the main ones he uses are logos, and ethos. The example for Brutus is in his opening line of his speech when he says “Romans, Countrymen, and lovers” (elements 831). What this states is that Brutus wants to speak to them logically as he thinks they are intelligent people and will understand what he says for his reason (Schoolworkhelper). Whereas Antony uses pathos and connects with the people emotionally by saying “Friends, Romans, Countrymen” (elements 834).

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout his entire speech, Antony always restates Brutus’s opinions in a fair and accurate way. He keeps his promise with the conspirators that he would not accuse them for the act of murdering Caesar. Antony starts his speech with, “For Brutus’ sake I am beholding to you,” (1146) to make sure that the crowd accepts him. Then, he continues with, “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke…” (1147) before continuing with his explanations. Although honoring the conspirators, he still adds small details to make them seem guilty, “I fear I wrong the honorable whose daggers have stabbed Caesar…” (1148)

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar: Analysis of Tone in Funeral Speeches MLK, Jr. once said, “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends” (Goodreads). In the play Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, actions and words are used and spoken against a friend and a rival contributing to the assassination of their fellow friend Caesar. Two people that were very close to Caesar speak out against each other during their funeral speeches. Brutus, who is a “friend” and also a conspirator against Caesar, and Antony who is a very loyal friend to Caesar, use several rhetorical and literary devices as they create tone of proud assertive and defiant manipulation to get the Roman citizens on their side.

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both used different techniques in order to capture the audience's attention and approval in their speeches about Caesar's death. They both include repetition, rhetorical strategies, dramatic pauses, and parallelism in order to get the crowd on their sides. Both men use different strategies by knowing the audience and they use this to their advantage. Brutus and Antony both choose the use of Pathos and Ethos specifically appeal to the audience and their love for their country.

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

In the play, Julius Caesar, both Brutus and Antony give speeches regarding Caesar’s death. Brutus’s speech first begins with him addressing the people saying, “Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe. Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses, that you may the better judge.” This is an example of logos, which is an appeal to logic. By starting out saying that the people have better judgement than he himself, he is appealing to the audience and to their logic.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Most times, when one thing is said, two things can be heard. The intent of the speech can be genuine and straightforward, or hidden in double-think and entendre. In Julius Caesar, this is the case with the dichotomy between Brutus and Marc Antony's speeches. the speeches both are given to sway the crowd to one side, and both use the tools of pathos, ethos, and antithesis to lead the country to their rallying cry.

Read More
292 Words | 2 Pages

In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus’ decision to allow Mark Antony to speak at the funeral of Julius Caesar marks the turning point of the tragedy through Antony's use of pathos and logos that turns the crowd against the conspirators. After Julius Caesar is killed, Mark Atony reasons with the conspirators, namely Brutus, to allow him to hold a memorial service for Caesar. Brutus, believing that Mark Atony poses no threat to him or the cause he stands for, allows him to do as such. However, during this speech, Mark Antony is able to use several persuasive techniques that turn the crowd against the conspirators, turning the play in a different direction. Mark Antony appeals to the audience's emotions, stating, "Have patience, gentle friends;

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

However, Antony uses his exact words to negate his argument. He says, “But Brutus says he was ambitious.” He does this in order to show the crowd that the conspirator 's main reason for killing Caesar was wrong. By giving examples of how Caesar wasn’t ambitious, then saying that Brutus said Caesar was ambitious, he turns the crowd against the conspirators, achieving his specific effect. Antony was the more persuasive character in the use of repetition because he was able to disprove the things Brutus said.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

In Act 3 Scene 2 Brutus said during his speech, “If that friend then demands to know why Brutus turned against Caesar, this is my answer: Not because I cared for Caesar less, but because I cared for Rome more”. Brutus had courage to kill Caesar, not because he wanted to, but for the good of Rome and its people. During the entirety of the story, Brutus

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

In Act 3, Scene 2 of the tragedy of Julius Caesar written by Shakespeare, there are 2 very important speeches that shape the countrymen’s view on the death of Caesar. Marcus Brutus gives the first speech in an attempt to justify the murder he and his fellow conspirators just committed and the second speech is given by Mark Antony to open the citizen’s eyes to just how dishonorable and heinous the crime these men committed was. Both men use many rhetorical strategies in their speeches such as syntax to create juxtaposition and word choice to highlight the similarities and differences between the audience and the speaker in order to create an effect of either superiority or relatability to the audience. Each speech was effective in persuading the people to agree with a certain view, however in the end Mark Antony gave the speech that won the crowd.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

III.ii.93–96” Here is where Antony contradicts Brutus’s previous points about Caesar, and takes Brutus’s credibility away by showing them that even an honorable man like Brutus will stab you in the back. The figure of speech that keeps showing up with all these elements and ties them all together to make this funeral speech complete and convincing enough against the conspirators is repetition. Repetition shows up a lot in the speech and helps get into people’s minds that Caesar was a good guy and didn’t deserve to die. Calling Brutus an honorable man repeatedly is hurting his image, because Antony is putting the words honorable man with negative thoughts putting negativity towards Brutus.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus tries to impress the crowd by saying that Caesar was going to become a dictator. “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (ii. III.L 22-24). Brutus gives this reason to make the people think this murderous act was honorable.

Read More

More about Antony's Ethos In Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document