ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos And Logos

665 Words3 Pages

Brutus “the honorable man” vs Antony “the noble man” In a battle of speeches, Brutus and Antony both give their speeches at Caesar’s funeral. In this paper, there will be discussion on the compare and contrast aspect of their speeches. Both Brutus and Antony give amazing speeches, but they both have different tactics when it comes to giving their speeches. In this paper Ethos, Pathos, and logos will be talked about and how each person used them to his advantage. The next paragraph will compare the speeches, giving details on how they are similar. When comparing both Brutus and Antony’s speeches and how they are similar it can all be summed up to one thing. They are both trying to persuade the audience or the people of Rome. Not only that, but the way they both spoke repetivally. For example Brutus says “I honor him; but, as he was ambitious , I slew him” (element 831). Throughout Brutus’s speech he continues to tell the crowd how …show more content…

When talking about the differences between the two speeches the main difference is how each person uses logos, ethos, and pathos. When Brutus says his speech the main ones he uses are logos, and ethos. The example for Brutus is in his opening line of his speech when he says “Romans, Countrymen, and lovers” (elements 831). What this states is that Brutus wants to speak to them logically as he thinks they are intelligent people and will understand what he says for his reason (Schoolworkhelper). Whereas Antony uses pathos and connects with the people emotionally by saying “Friends, Romans, Countrymen” (elements 834). This allows him to connect with the people and make them feel like he is just as equal as they are (Schoolworkhelper). Both of them use good tactics, but Antony understands that the common people are easily persuaded and if he uses emotion he will be able to sway them to his side and want to riot against the

Show More
Related
1009 Words | 5 Pages

Brutus and Antony both spoke to the Plebeians at Caesar’s funeral with the intent to persuade the crowd to be in favor of themselves. Since Brutus utilized Ethos and Logos to explain his actions and nothing more, his speech was logical. Correspondingly, he had spoken with the hope that the situation would resolve with the Plebeian’s understanding and his entry into Kingman ship. Meanwhile, Antony made use of Pathos with Logos. Therefore, Antony’s monologue was based emotionally.

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

By comparing the use of ethos, logos, and pathos, in the speeches made by Brutus and Antony, it becomes clear that Antony is more persuasive. Even though the speech made by Brutus had some moments where it was superior overall it wasn’t as persuasive and Antony’s. Antony’s speech successfully convinces the crowd through the three elements being examined. Ethos is credibility for the speaker, by having ethos it becomes easier for the speaker to convince the crowd of something.

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus is the more persuasive person of Antony and him and was able to get his point across and handle the commoner’s feelings without getting them furious at himself. Brutus was able to get everything he needed done in a time were the commoners did not have time to think and was able to get out that they needed to go after the true enemies. He also used more Ethos, Pathos, and logos than Antony so Brutus is the most

Read More
166 Words | 1 Pages

In Brutus' speech he uses logos to try to reason with the crowd whilst Antony uses pathos to control their emotions. Brutus explains that for the betterment of Rome Caesar had to die or else he would ruin the country and destroy the great empire. He at first has everyone on his side, that is of course until Antony speaks. When Antony speaks he gives examples of how Caesar wasn't going to ruin Rome and in fact how he was the best leader they had ever had. He says that Brutus and Cassius are murderers and that's all they are.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

At the end of the speech, Antony has won the citizens over and they feel that what Brutus and Cassius did was wrong and they want

Read More
113 Words | 1 Pages

Because Brutus uses prose, it is a reflection of his rational argument defending his reasoning for assassinating Caesar and his own rational thought process. Mark Antony however, approaches the audience with a more emotional and tactful oration. He speaks in iambic pentameter, which is common when one is speaking emotionally and passionately, as in the case of Mark Antony. This is an illustration of his emotion eliciting speech and passionate rebuttal of Brutus' accusation of Caesar's ambition. As for the actual content of the speeches, Brutus presented a group of more rational and intentional ideas rather than Mark Antony's sympathy and tact.

Read More
158 Words | 1 Pages

Brutus is a man of logic and reason. He delivers his speech in such a declamatory manner. He believes that he can change the minds of the people through rational thinking. Anthony, on the other hand, delivers his speech by conveying his emotions to the audience. He appeals the feelings of the people.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

Would you trust someone who kills their best friend for the good of their country or some guy who thinks they knew the leader? Exactly, you would want and trust a leader who would do anything for the good of their country. Julius Caesar was murder by Brutus and the other conspirators but they said it was for the good of Rome. Brutus and Antony both gave a speeches over Julius Caesars death to appeal to the plebeians. Brutus funeral speech was a more effective speech than Antony because his use of ethos, pathos, and logos made the plebeians focus on his words more.

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus and Antony use ethos, logos, and pathos in their speeches to convince the commoners of their side of the story. One person just so happens to be more convincing than the other. Using ethos,

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus 's speech: Brutus speaks to the people of rome why he killed caesar so they will not turn on him. He talked about how he didnt kill him because he didn 't love him but because it was for the better of rome. He also tells the people of rome that letting caesar become king would mean the government type would change and all the wars and hard work his family had put into the government would go away. He also states, for the welfare of rome that he would die for rome if rome demands his death Rhetorical devices: Brutus used questions, logos, parallelism, and pathos to stir the people of rhome. Question-

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos And Logos

Related Topics

Open Document