There are many similarities and differences incorporated in West Africa’s and Southeast Asia’s patterns of interaction with Eurasian trade routes. In comparison, both used the silk road as a method of trade and commercial interaction, which let to both continents being able to assimilate the factors of gaining new resources and customs; second they both took advantage of the use of water for travel and this led through many Eurasian routes in order for them to culturally diffuse. However, Southeast Asian’s from the interaction of the Eurasian routes, was mainly or religious purposes; meanwhile Africa used the routes for profit through slave trade. The role of trading and commercial selling was a big deal in the interaction aspect of the Eurasian trade routes. And one main similarity between Southeast Asia and West Africa is the method of gaining new resources from either direction of the trade routes. For example, some big items they traded was silk, spices, different forms of wood, cloths, fruits, pottery, and other silverware. These were …show more content…
The Southeastern Asian region was portaryed for to being porportrated as a want for religious purposes. For example, they had missionaries that would travel along these Eurasian trade routes in order to spread the idea of both Buddhism as well as Hindu religion. This was important because this make many changes in future laws, and government, because kings later would take religion as its main priority when ruling. In contrast, people from West Africa used the trade routes for purposes of also cultural expansion, but for a more profitable reason- slaves. Most of these slaves were used within the emerging West African civilization, and were making a big positive economical profit. And the use of these trade routes were to proclaim its significance and reasoning to show people the use or it, and get money at the same