ipl-logo

Listening To Aphasia Patient Analysis

1480 Words6 Pages

Agreement Especially difficult is the fact, that a story told by a narrator can be understood differently by the listener. This deserves explanation. For clarity, we are talking about two people. First: whoever wants to tell the story; the narrator. The second: the listening party; the listener. Take away The most frustrating thing is that a person is not heard. There is no one who listens to him or her. The narrator, the aphasia patient, is usually the talker. That person tells his or her story. After all, he wants to share his story. The listener does not hear the story when the aphasia patient is stammering. He takes the role of the narrator and even finishes the story for the other. That is the dangerous moment. He, the narrator, can …show more content…

That is because a listener is generally not inclined to go to someone else. My experience is that the listener does not take the time to really listen to the Careful conclusion: Listening to an elderly person who reacts and talks slower than someone else, or who is called ´dumb´ or ´confused´, has little chance of success. Knowledge that I gathered as aphasia patient and as a former social worker. This ´taking over´ the story of the narrator holds two risks: - The story of the listener has become the only ‘true’ story. - The original narrator is cut off from his or her ‘truth’. Choosing 1st On the one hand, the narrator can tell his story. Try to persuade the listener of his views. This was his original intention and action. 2nd On the other hand, hold his tongue and try to follow what happened next. Give the listener the opportunity to express his opinion. A view that replaces what the narrator wanted to say. The narrator then searches arguments which adapt his story to the reasoning of the listener. Backside The narrator is once again confronted with the fact that what he was trying to tell at the beginning - is not being heard.

Show More
Related
1259 Words | 6 Pages

The Perspectives of “The New New” The perspective of a story can and will drastically affect what a reader perceives and believes about a tale. A book’s perspective serves as a window, from which the reader looks through to view the fictional world beyond. Kelly Stuart’s “The New New” has several characters who are led to believe different things based on their perspective. Stuart takes this idea a step further, and using the book’s limited third person narrative, Stuart pulls the reader to believe certain things without evidence.

Read More
1893 Words | 8 Pages

In the book The Liars Club, by Mary Karr, she utilizes the literary element voice to weave together a story of her unfortunate childhood. This book covers the majority of her childhood years, and the several problems her childhood included. When Karr narrates the book she is the sole voice in the text, however she also incorporates others statements and communication through her own voice. She uses voice to piece together her own, and other’s statements into the story of her childhood. While Mary Karr is the only narrator in the story, the text is polyvocal, meaning that multiple individuals are voiced through Karr’s narration.

Read More
1413 Words | 6 Pages

Six million Jews were killed during the Holocaust. The Jews were persecuted, tortured and slaughtered in concentration camps. Night by Eliezer Wiesel illustrates his struggles as he is faced with silences in its most profound and tragic form. This stunning memoir provides a conceptual overview of four types of silence Eliezer experiences throughout his journey. These specific types of silence include; from the world, within Eliezer himself, the Jewish people and from God.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

was written in the limited omniscient point of view. The narrator was telling the story from Jake’s point of view and the audience were following Jake’s thought, action, and emotion all throughout this short story. Now, the narrator is telling the story from Mariana point of view. Mariana is not too fond of Jake and his corny pick-up lines nor is she flattered. As a matter of fact, she is highly disgusted with Jake’s behavior and lack of seriousness throughout this ordeal.

Read More
1493 Words | 6 Pages

The aforementioned perspectives are explored through the limited omniscient third person narrator, who narrates in a factual tone and provides the lens from which events are viewed. Although the narrator is omniscient in the traditional sense, as he or she has access to the thoughts of all characters, the narrator is limited in that he or she solely follows Anton’s journey. Consequently, the events that transpired previous to and following the assault remain ambiguous and fluctuate as new information is introduced by supporting characters. Within the exposition, The Assault features Anton’s perspective on the events leading up to the incident.

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

In P6 of my work I am going to explain the role of supportive relationships to reduce the risk of abuse and neglect. If a person is interested in a career in health and social care is important you develop the skills needed to form professional supportive relationship with individuals and their families. So you need a basic understanding of the elements that make up a relationship.

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

Dr. Treves then asks John why he didn’t mention that he could read when they when they were practicing and he explains that he was frightened and afraid to talk. The point where he discovers this is when he asks Dr. Treves directly about his condition and state of being. John asks, “Can you cure me? and then Dr. Treves responds, “No. We can care for you but not cure you.”

Read More
1062 Words | 5 Pages

This explains the why the narrator initially refers only to himself. The reader is then

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

I first discovered speech-language pathology back when I was in high school, in a very unexpected way. I was talking with my grandmother, who had told me she received her Masters degree in Speech-Language Pathology after my father was born. My father has had hearing aids since the age of five, and had to continuously attend speech therapy while growing up. My grandmother told me stories of how she would sit with my father every night, away from his six other siblings, with the lights off and talk to him. She would say words to him, which he would then have to repeat back to her, without relying on his normal trick of reading lips.

Read More
1497 Words | 6 Pages

This proves that they appears to be the third person narration of this novel that they do not assume character's perspective and is not a character in the story, and reports on events that lets the reader supply the

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

Points out the specific grammatical aspects of the story and the meanings that we, the audience, can take out of it as we read. We learn that the narrator is also the main character in the story and has a very big awakening and life changing surprise at the end. Very similar to “A&P”. • Joel William Hendrickson. Rude Awakening in “A&P” and “Cathedral”

Read More
1187 Words | 5 Pages

However, only seeing through the protagonist’s eyes, would cause the reader to be unable to see the big picture. Third person single vision is the only point of view that would work for Liam O’Flaherty’s short story, “The Sniper,” because the protagonist needs to be tough as he is fighting at war. Employing an outside narrator, or “a voice created by the author to tell the story,” to provide extremely descriptive details about the sniper’s appearance and subtle details about his surroundings is how

Read More
860 Words | 4 Pages

The narrator, an unnamed man is the most obvious protagonist of the story because he is the person telling the story and changes the most in that story. The narrators actions,

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

This is a key point in understanding the narrator’s character and the overall meaning of the

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

Communication is always crucial for the success and happiness in relationships. However, when done wrong, it usually results in failure. In William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, poor communication causes characters to make bad decisions that lead to the tragic end of Romeo and Juliet. Poor communication between the characters is found by keeping secrets, which prevents the revealing of truth and through assumption in which characters do not try to find the truth. As the play progresses it becomes evident that poor communication has negative impacts on the story causing the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet.

Read More

More about Listening To Aphasia Patient Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document