ipl-logo

Apology And Phaedo: The Personal Philosophy Of Socrates

1148 Words5 Pages

Connor R. Kremer
Dr. Jane Frazier
ENG-320-01
14 February 2023
The Personal Philosophy of Socrates The philosophical influence of Socrates is almost incomparable to that of any other philosopher. His teachings and those of his students have changed how humans think, theorize, and communicate with others. However, the Ancient Greeks that lived alongside Socrates did not appreciate his contemporary conversations on morality. “Apology” and “Phaedo” entail the two most important moments in Socrates’ life and legacy. Both compositions are substantial accounts of modern Socratic concepts, which have influenced philosophy worldwide. They establish the benevolence of Socrates’ character and the ethics and morals he inspired. Specifically, Socrates’ …show more content…

This composition discusses Socrates’ ideas about the concepts of death, the afterlife, and the immortality of the soul. First, Socrates argues that the soul is separate from the body. This leads to his conclusion that death is only the end of the body, not the soul. Moreover, this explains why Socrates is not particularly fearful of death. He says, “The venture is a glorious one, and he ought to comfort himself…” (Plato 455). The “venture" he speaks of is the transition from life to death. Overall, “Phaedo" allows the reader to understand Socrates’ ideas about the soul, death, and what comes …show more content…

For example, in “Apology,” Socrates asks Socratic questions to defend himself (e.g., asking his interrogators about their logical flaws). One specific case involves his conversation with Meletus, one of his accusers. Socrates poses a long list of questions, starting with, “You think a great deal about the improvement of youth?" (Plato 439). This leads to Meletus' admission that Socrates’ outsmarted him and that he has no proof of his accusations. This process shows that Socrates valued critical thinking in every avenue—even for his enemy. The Socratic Method is still used in trials and interrogations

Show More
Related

Comparing Socrates In The Apology, Crito, And The Republic

802 Words | 4 Pages

The version of Socrates presented in both The Apology, Crito, and The Republic could very well be two different versions of Socrates as presented by Plato. However, both versions of Socrates have one thing in common: they both value the importance of philosophy and they both defend philosophy as something that is important to humanity. The Apology is Socrates defending not only himself, but also philosophy as an area of study that could be useful to the city of Athens. Socrates is trying to defend himself and his study and he tries to distance himself from the sophists in that they charge for money.

Read More

Comparing Socrates Apology And The Crito

1678 Words | 7 Pages

With those two teachings, comes another one of his more deeply meaningful quotes “an unexamined life is not worth living for a human being”. This statement by Socrates is one that gets a human being to think about what he meant by what an examined life or unexamined life is. His quote is telling people to go through life and analyze and question things, because if not they have not lived life the way it should be for a human being. Without examining life, life would become a stagnant environment, never evolving from past cultures and past ideals.

Read More

Tissue In Socrates's Apology

665 Words | 3 Pages

The Apology was supposed to represent Socrates' trial for his being a busybody and corrupting the youth. Socrates defended himself by saying that he was merely performing service to the god that said that he waswiser than anyone else. Socratesremained defiant during the sentencing portion of the trial, which led to him besentenced to death, and as such he had to face his mortality. In this paper, I will explain how he came to this conclusion,and show why this conclusion is false. At many points throughout the Apology, Socrates insists that death is not bad.

Read More

Private Life In Socrates's Apology

1021 Words | 5 Pages

It is challenging to lead a private life while truly fighting for justice. A man can fight for justice through examining the greatest issues in human nature that Socrates found essential to the private life. However, this knowledge can have the biggest effect when brought into the public life such as through teachings. These two things can then combine to reflect how the state should be changed. Socrates sometimes crossed this line himself, even if unknowingly.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Socrates 'Apology'

1314 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates was a greek philosopher who found himself in trouble with his fellow citizens and court for standing his grounds on his new found beliefs from his studies about philosophical virtue, justice, and truth. In “Apology” written by Plato, Socrates defended himself in trial, not with the goal of escaping the death sentence, but with the goal of doing the right thing and standing for his beliefs. With this mindset, Socrates had no intention of kissing up to the Athenians to save his life. Many will argue that Socrates’ speech was not very effective because he did not fight for his life, he just accepted the death sentence that he was punished with. In his speech he said, “But now it’s time to leave, time for me to die and for you to live.”

Read More

Who Is Socrates Corrupted In The Apology

1353 Words | 6 Pages

In “The Apology,” Socrates stands blamed for corrupting the young people of Athens and teaching the false divine beings, charges that eventually lead to his conviction. All through his defence, Socrates eagerly denies these allegations and declares that his activities are driven by a profound love for Athens. Accordingly, this paper is to dissect Socrates’ defence against the allegations introduced in “The Apology” and assess whether he really loved Athens by drawing bits of knowledge from both “The Apology” and “The Symposium.” In “The Apology,” Socrates justifies himself by using a mix of rationale, reason, and irony to address the allegations set out against him.

Read More

In Defense Of The Fear Of Death: Analyzing Socrates Apology

1013 Words | 5 Pages

In Defense of the Fear of Death: Analyzing “Socrates’ Apology” Within “The Apology”, Socrates makes many claims about life and its meaning. One of the most controversial claims he makes is that fearing death is illogical and “amounts simply to thinking one is wise when one is not (40)”. I believe this claim is wrong for two reasons. Firstly, his claim comes from a place of ignorance towards fear and how it works. Also, this claim shows his hypocrisy, as his claim that death is not to be feared shows that he thinks he is wise when he is not.

Read More

The Corruption Of Socrates In Plato's Apology

560 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates claims that he did not consciously corrupt the youth of Athens, and he gives many reasons why he is not at fault for these actions. In his defense to the jury, he tells them that by looking at the facts, they will see Meletus is accusing him of something that is not true. The way Socrates defends himself is well-thought out and logical. He ask Meletus a serious of questions and Meletus answers, Socrates then moves on to the next question to support his claim.

Read More

Plato Apology: The Trial Of Socrates

606 Words | 3 Pages

“Plato Apology” relates the trial of Socrates (469-399) B.C.E known as the father of Western Philosophy. Socrates, a son of sculpture and the midwife had a queer with most Athenians due to his point of view on values and beliefs. Charged with impiety and corrupting the Youth, Socrates’ defends himself by persuading the jury of his innocence with tangible reasons which made his arguments effective.

Read More

Differences In Socrates's Golden Age

824 Words | 4 Pages

Socrates, a famous philosopher, during the Golden Age, was well known for the creation of the Socratic method. This particular method is a conversational skill where individuals ask thought-provoking questions without providing a lot of information or answers. Socrates' purpose for this method was to influence people to think more critically about their beliefs and basic assumptions about life. Although his purpose was pure, his method outraged countless members of the community because his conversational skills left them feeling ignorant. Despite questioning widely accepted beliefs, Socrates never considered himself a Sophist and continued to share his ideas.

Read More

The Failure Of Socrates In Plato's Apology

740 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates attempted to make a logical argument of the accusations when he questioned his accuser, Meletus. Then, to ensure his acquittal, he tried to appeal to the emotions of the judges. While Socrates’ defense was thought provoking, his inflation of self-importance worked against him in his trial, as he failed to persuade the court of his innocent ignorance. Socrates opening statement to the court was not only to build upon his character as favorable but also to lower the character of his accusers. He stated “I know that their persuasive words almost made me forget who I was - such was the effect of

Read More

Analysis Of Socrates: Four Dialogues, By Plato

1595 Words | 7 Pages

Socrates is quoted as stating, “An unexamined life is a life not worth living” (38 a). Socrates was a founding figure of western philosophy, and a stable for many ideas. He lived in Athens, Greece teaching his students, like Plato, questioning politics, ethical choices, and many other things in Greek society. In the Trial and death of Socrates: Four Dialogues by Plato, it explores the abstract questioning Socrates had towards many of the normal social properties, which led to his trial, resulting in his death. The most important aspects discussed in the dialogues is the questioning of what is pious and impious, what it means to be wise, and good life.

Read More

Apology: Socrates Assignment

713 Words | 3 Pages

The purpose behind Socrates cross-examination technique was to inquire and open a discussion based on asking and answering questions, to stimulate deeper thought and critical thinking of ideas discussed to counter the charges and make them seem invalid. The implementation of this cross-examination technique occurs when Socrates asks Meletus, “Tell me, my good sir, who improves our young men?”(Apology 24e). Meletus getting embarrassed in front of the jury by Socrates with the claims and comments like, “You see, Meletus, that you are silent and know not what to say” and simply answers, “The laws,” which was not a good enough answer to counter Socrates claims. At this point Socrates began to change the perspective of the trial with some simple intelligent questions. With the consistent questioning of Socrates, Meletus accepted that members of the assembly were all good influences on the youth, but considering the assembly admits all adult males, he mistakenly claims and admits that the entire population of Athens was a positive influence on the youth, except Socrates.

Read More

Socrates, Spielvogel, Western Civilization

1048 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates was arguably one of the wisest men to ever live. Having written nothing of his own, everything known about him was recorded by his pupils, especially Plato, who is considered by many to be the greatest philosopher of Western civilization.1 The vision of Socratic philosophy can be traced through Socrates' very actions and words as recorded in documents like The Apology, Crito, and Phaedo of Socrates. Socrates' vision pours out into what his goals and methods were like and overflows into critical application in society now. While on trial in Athens, Socrates seemed to keep himself level-headed, defending himself to his accusers while also laying out what his vision and goals were.

Read More

Socrates Apology Analysis

1070 Words | 5 Pages

His personal defense is described in works two of his students: Xenophon and Plato. Both of them wrote papers called Apology, which is the Greek word for “defense”. In this essay I used Apology by Plato as the main resource, since it contents a more full account of the trial of Socrates and his words. Despite the fact that the philosopher attempted to defend himself and explain the reasons for saying and doing the things he did, it did not do any good for his justification. On the contrary, Socrates’ words seemed to make the jury harden their hearts and condemn him.

Read More

More about Apology And Phaedo: The Personal Philosophy Of Socrates

Related Topics

Open Document