There has been a long battle of nature and nurture and which one is responsible for the human social development. Many say it is solely biological that as humans we have innateness that separate us from others. Others argue that it is the experiences we have. Although we develop our social selves through both. It is not a matter of which one is responsible for social development but rather to what degree does each influence the social development of a human being. It is not completely known how much of our social development is due to environmental cause and how much is biological. Although, to figure out how much is biological influence researchers use twin studies to identify what is different. Researchers have a mathematical formula that allows them to understand the differences between the environmental influences and …show more content…
These biological factors help them socialize with those around them. Such things like; mirror neurons, vision, hearing and imitation. After just hours of birth neonates can mirror facial expressions. The auditory system relates to the newborns ability to remember sounds from utero. Lastly the visual system, although vision is the last of the senses to develop, a neonate is first born they are only able to see as far as an arm length. These are just a few biological experiences that are innate in humans at birth to start forming social attachments. Although, various other factors that help socialize young children to the social world. These biological factors help newborns and infants at young are be sensitive to these social cues. Although, social development is not just biological but also environmental experiences, the focus here will be innate biological abilities that help children learn how to be social beings. The factors that suggest humans have innate biological influences are; mirror neurons, vision system and auditory system.