I vote against the Compact of Free Association (COFA) because as a delegate of Hawaii the negative effect on Hawaii exceeds the positive effects on the Unified States in general. The Compact of Free Association is a treaty that gave the nation of Palau, the Marshall Islands and the confederate states of Micronesia an open access to the United States. COFA is beneficial for the United States because they get land for furthermore unnecessary process. The harmful effects of COFA toward hawaii is by creating a legacy of health problems and also lacking The United States consequently was allowed restrictive military access to the area. As to find out about COFA it is encouraged to find out about it, the adverse consequences for the general population who experience …show more content…
Some of the major negative points that are constantly occurring since the act of COFA is the amount of Homelessness because despite the fact that it is generally simple to enter this nation there is not a surety to be living in a home even thought they were guaranteed a temporary stay. As legitimate occupants they can work, received restorative treatment and are required to pay neighborhood, state and government charges.
COFA residents (not citizens) pay for social service programs like Children 's Health Insurance Programs but do not fully benefit from them entirely. “As legal residents (but not citizens), COFA residents can work, study, receive medical treatment and are required to pay local, state and federal taxes. In return, they were initially eligible for most of the same public benefits as Americans. That changed in during 1996 federal welfare reform when Congress restricted access to a broad range of programs to certain non-US citizen residents including COFA migrants. The result was many COFA patients were cut off from the very health care system their tax dollars were supposed to