ipl-logo

Argument For The Poor And Low Income Tax

1233 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Religion and american politicans essay

The infamous debate of taxes stems from one unruly question: should the wealthy pay a greater percentage of taxes than middle and lower income people? Current tax laws are considered a progressive tax structure. This means the more you make, the percentage of taxes progressively increases. According to Forbes, “The top rate will fall from 39.6% to 37%. The bottom rate remains at 10%, but it covers twice the amount of income compared to the previous brackets” (Forbes). People get taxed different amounts depending on their income, which had created a political feud between Republicans and Democrats. One common question that comes up in this debate is “Is it fair for the rich to have to pay more than the poor?” Often times Conservatives want equal …show more content…

One way people approach this debate is through their religious beliefs. Although the Catholic Church does not has not released an explicit statement of which side they favor, we can use Catholic principles and ideas to come to the conclusion that the Catholic Church would favor the top one percent of wage earners to pay a higher percentage order to redistribute wealth throughout the United States of America. I assume that this would be their position, because one of the Catholic Social Teachings is Option for the Poor and Vulnerable. This encourages them to want more taxes to be collected in order to fund programs to alleviate the struggle that poor people endure. Additionally, if you look at the justice triangle, society owes individuals through distributive justice. This means that the government should be responsible to help individuals—especially those who are not as well off. Another side of the justice triangle is commutative justice where individuals owe other individuals. The top one percent of wage earners should help support other individuals by providing them resources to become more successful. The top one percent of wage earners gets help form the other individuals by having them work for their companies—for example. The final side of the justice triangle is legal justice—where individuals owe society. In this case, the top one percent of wage earners owe society a percentage of the money they earned in order to help fund government-run programs. All things considered, instead of requiring the top one percent of wage earners to pay a higher tax rate, everyone should pay the same rate regardless of their financial status since they already have to pay larger sums of money to the government and often they do not use the government-run organizations that are being funded by their tax

Show More
Related
261 Words | 2 Pages

Contributor to Forbes, Tony Nitti identifies which classes and types of people will benefit from the recently passed tax bill. At the time the article was written, the bill had not yet been signed into effect by the president. According to Nitti, “Tonight's victory belonged solely to the Republicans. The Senate passed the bill without a single "yes" vote from one of its 48 Democrats, but then, this was the plan all along.” He also pegs the winners as corporations, the richest one percent, and the middle class- “for now.”

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

Why should the poor and rich have to pay the same amount of taxes if they make extremely different incomes? Brooks focuses on the social and migration problems of progressive taxing and doesn’t apply his thought to the economic issues, as he

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

Amy Chozick in “Hillary Clinton Twists the Knife in Donald Trump’s Tax Proposal” presented the plan of Mrs. Clinton on tax proposals to tax on income of wealthy people beginning from the last 15 years to invest in education to make college more affordable, in skills training, in infrastructure, and in domestic agenda (2016). After reading this article I find myself supporting to Mrs. Clinton not because of Mr. Trump’s tax proposals that only supports to business owners and billionaires like him but because of Mrs. Clinton’s proposals that will certainly helps to minimize the gap between middle class family and business owner to some extent. Going through this article I have an opportunity to update some of my general knowledge about tax system of the United States like corporate tax, exit tax, surcharge tax,

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

The income tax would try to even the playing field, so the rich would have to pay higher taxes while the poor pay smaller taxes. Also, the income tax would serve as payment for the government so in turn they can pay for different areas of

Read More
1147 Words | 5 Pages

Title Economic inequality was created. Lots of factors lead to the long-standing social inequality, such as gender, ethnicity, age, level of education and so on. How would people split up income between the top ten percent and the rest if it were up to them? It depends on which group they belong to. They strive for more benefit for themselves.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

I do not think that some people should pay more taxes than other people because I see no reason why some people pay more taxes than others when they are just the same in terms of income and asset ownership. If this were to be implemented there would be improved living standards. People who work and only make a little bit of money are burdened by the high taxes since they are already struggling to make ends meet. The changes that just recommended would most likely affect the economic ability of the government to carry out its functions because the changes will help bring equality into the government and also bring functionality.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

In today’s world money seems to be the center of gravity for many people. Unfortunately, many people have lower incomes and struggle to pay all of their taxes, while on the other hand, the rich are rumored to evade paying taxes. There are many controversial topics in the tax world including flat tax and the way the lower income people are treated with taxes. Before I discuss problems of today’s tax world, I will give a brief history of taxes in America.

Read More
614 Words | 3 Pages

the Pew Research Center found. The some corporations that don’t pay their fair share maintain of higher income families or also know as rich people. The lower income families were found to pay more than they should and that the Government bank on them more than the higher income. Finally, the medium income families present that the taxes should be reformed. What has this to do with the Government getting its’ power from the people?

Read More
1766 Words | 8 Pages

Should America implement a flat tax? According to Steve Forbes “For many years, people have said, ‘Make the rich pay more,’ and many politicians have said, ‘The rich people need to pay their fair share,’” (Forbes) but what do we think is really fair?

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

One of the arguments used is that we could regulate and tax the 1% income because that would be “fair” but these numbers show how harmful that way of thinking is. 18% of taxes for the “bottom” of the bracket which is around 20% of the U.S population.

Read More
1897 Words | 8 Pages

Should we tax the rich more? There is an ongoing debate in the USA and across the world about how big the tax contribution of the wealthy should be and whether it should be increased. The nonpartisan Tax Foundation found GOP candidates are proposing anywhere from $2 trillion to $12 trillion in tax cuts over the next decade. How they do that is up for debate. Both Republicans and Democrats favor tax cuts in some instances.

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

Wealth and Inequality in America Inequality The inequality in America has increased over time; the gap between the rich and the poor has become a problem that many Americans don’t see. Inequality is the extent of income which is distributed unequally among the citizenry. The inequality of the United has a large gap between the poor and the rich making it unfair to the population, the rich are becoming wealthier and the poor remain poor. The article “Of the 1%, By the 1%, For the 1%”, authored by Joseph E. Stiglitz describes that there is a 1 percent amount of American’s who are consuming about a quarter of the United States income in a year.

Read More
2060 Words | 9 Pages

On the one hand, providing state subsidy might be a good tool for this challenge. In this way relatively poor people in society are helped to increase their welfare and to limit inequality. On the other hand, there is the possibility to decrease inequality by limiting some of the welfare of the relatively rich people in society. This can be done by raising taxes on luxury goods while keeping the tax on other goods the same. However, a sales tax on

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

Do you ever think of why should or shouldn’t the rich people pay more tax than others? Nowadays, people are arguing about the fairness of paying more tax. Statistics have proven that the rich have paid the majority of U.S. income taxes. A person making $100,000 will pay a higher percentage of his income in taxes than a person making $20,000 for instance. According to the Congressional Budget Office, “The 10% of households with the highest incomes pay more than half of all federal taxes.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

Many people are strongly debating whether or not the rich should pay higher taxes. I believe it should be that the rich do pay higher taxes. When times in the economy are rough, the government needs to look consider at how they could bring in more money. Charging the wealthy higher taxes could be a strategy the government could use., and the wealthy people are the ones who could afford it.

Read More

More about Argument For The Poor And Low Income Tax

Related Topics

Open Document