ipl-logo

Universality Of Human Rights Argument Analysis

1082 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on the universal declaration of human rights

The Argument over Universality of Human Right and Cultural Relativism (RENTELN VIEW)

Whether the right recognized in the universal Declaration of Human Rights and the international Human Rights covenant are universal? Is a question that has led to many human right scholars to pose a controversial debate on the aspect of the universality of human rights.
Like order scholar who have centre their controversies on the nature of human right, its source, justification and origin . But Renteln argument deals with the issue of universality of human right which is aim to achieve an international commitment in the implementation of human rights that is currently being witnessed though with respect to the concept of a cultural diversity .
However, it …show more content…

No doubt, RENTELN view as against the westerner terming Human Right as universe is very brilliant, because she was able to expose the fact that what was obtainable in west was Egalitarian system which is not a universal phenomenon . Also a close examination of RETELN’s postulation also represents some facet of the view point of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) which holds the view …show more content…

Section 1 of the Act prohibit any marriage contracted, or civil union between same sex, and further made any certificate as regard the consummation of same sex marriage issue by any foreign countries to any of its citizens to be void in Nigeria. Anyone found practicing same-sex marriage will face imprisonment for 14 years upon conviction .
From the above it is evident that the term universalism of human right is particularly of western imperialistic ideology to impose some of their culture on non-western, which may not be in accordance of their cultural practice.
Furthermore argument was that, RENTELN capture in her works that;
“the most misleading source from which the universalist draw the idea of the universality of human right has been the natural law which hold the assumption that human right are self evident, they are held by individual by virtue of being a human being, this she said no doubt that the above assumption is the common view of human nature and they are agreed upon ranking of priorities with respect to basic human needs. She said but it is by no means clear that there is universal assent to the ordering of human needs as is evidenced by the relative support of the two covenants on human right

Show More
Related
545 Words | 3 Pages

Universal human rights are the rights that every human is entitled to. They cannot be taken away from anyone. Although many of these were violated in “Night” like Article 1 (Right to equality), Article 2 (Freedom of discrimination), and Article 4 (Freedom of slavery). Article 1-The right to equality was violated in Night. In page 28, paragraph 6, the

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

Imposition on Human Rights The modern conception of civil liberties involves a long list of individual rights which include the right to liberty and security of person, rights to property and privacy, right to a fair trial and the rights to free speech. These civil and political rights are now framed as “human rights” and are protected by numerous international treaties. Freedom of movement is also broadly recognised in international law and bills of rights. Article 13 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within borders of each state.

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

Jonathan Wolff’s article primary addresses the unfair treatment of social and economic rights, emphasizing on the current global health crisis in particular; it disputes human rights not equally prioritized. He then poses a challenging but essential question: “How can there be a human right to health if the resources are just not there to satisfy it?” He obviously takes to heart the necessity of good health care as a natural right for humans and he believes it should be legally our right to have a good health system. His believe can draw once mind to reevaluate Franklin Roosevelt's 1941 speech in which he alleged that the “four freedoms”—freedom of speech and worship, and freedom from fear and want—are basic human rights. Wolff construes, the right to health is a human right as reported by the Declaration of Human Rights.

Read More
1283 Words | 6 Pages

They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” This article is a good summary of what ER and the UN tried to accomplish with this document. The UDHR then goes deeper into specific

Read More
1156 Words | 5 Pages

For instance, some people choose to believe that woman are paid less than a man because they are thought to be insubstantial. However, their interpretation is incorrect based off the logos appeal because the preamble says, “We the people”, and society should be thought of as a whole and should not be divided based on gender. In Anthony’s speech she says, “It is we the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we the male citizens; but we, the whole people, we formed the Union.” Anthony demonstrates how everyone is a person and the Constitution clearly states that everyone should be equally treated, and people

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

Such as, in paragraph 4 “ but we assembled to protest against a form of government existing without the consent of the governed” She reference the declaration of independence to make her point more clear. It shows event though we made a declaration for independence it would make women eligible to have the same rights as men but instead weren’t cared enough to make sure men would guarantied their rights. In addition, she also used “and it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy.” She used this allusion to compare it to a passage from the bible.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

She states one of the basic principles of the United Nations, then challenges corrupt governments and interest groups on their prioritizing of profit and power over the people themselves, as well as establishing a contrast between the ideal situation and reality. Kyi uses matter-of-fact, pointed language, for example, describing oppressors as “powerful and unprincipled [people] ...dominating the weak and helpless,” to support her claim. In terms of diction, she juxtaposes politics and ethics to emphasize the need for their coexistence. Her subsequent description of the United Nations’ policy on human rights, “the...freedoms to which all human beings regardless of race, nationality, or religion are entitled,” uses a fairly unusual word order; the main verb is moved to the end of the sentence in order to stress the idea that all human beings should be free of coercion or discrimination. Kyi’s citation of the United Nations may add an appeal to ethos as well.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

As we look throughout history, governments have implemented policies and are partially responsible for the denial of human rights to a certain group. These groups include Ukrainians and Rwandans. The denial of human rights in these regions not only affect those in the region but internationally. Both Ukrainians and Rwandans were denied their human rights. Ukraine’s hope and will was in the hands of the dictator Joseph Stalin.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

The text is about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states the fundamental rights and freedoms everyone universally is entitled to (Rayner). As a result of World War II, the United Nations established a Human Rights Commission, which dealt with the violations of human rights the victims of World War II suffered (History of the Document). Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed as a delegate to the United Nations and soon became the chair of the Commission (Lewis). In her speech she is speaking to the United Nations General Assembly in order to convince them to endorse the Declaration of Human Rights. Eleanor Roosevelt delivered this speech on December 9, 1948 (Eidenmuller).

Read More
1655 Words | 7 Pages

While the arguments for universal healthcare contain a solid foundation in logic and emotion, they have few facts, the arguments against universal healthcare, however, are much more persuasive because they maintain a core basis in facts which outweigh the logic and emotion of the arguments supporting universal health care. The arguments for universal healthcare contain some facts; most have a stronger basis in logic and emotion, and some cases contain no facts. This is shown by highlighting the question of whether universal healthcare is a benefit or detriment to the economy, whether universal health care provides better quality health care or whether saving money is more important than having the freedom to choose your healthcare. Not only

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

On December 9, 1948, as the United States was approaching a proposal towards the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which seemed unfair and uncompromised, first lady, Eleanor Roosevelt displayed a motivational and moving speech to allow the citizens of America to come together as one to make the best of the situation that was proposed in front of them. The analysis of the tingling speech on the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, will explore the deep rhetorical devices used to compel the audience and America, including the true purpose and background of this particular eye-opening speech. In paragraph 1, it reads, “Not every man nor every government can have what he wants in a document of this kind. There are of course particular provisions in the Declaration before us with which we are not fully satisfied.”

Read More
1120 Words | 5 Pages

Correspondingly, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights depend on dignity, equality and mutual respect – regardless of your nationality, your religion or your beliefs. Your rights are tied in with being dealt with reasonably and treating others decently, and being able to make on decisions about your own life. These fundamental human rights are: Universal; They have a place with every one of us; They can't be detracted from us, Indivisible and independent Governments should not have the capacity to choose

Read More
1378 Words | 6 Pages

I believe that the de re/de dicto account and the pluralistic account dodge a dilemma of the rights-based accounts. This is partly because these accounts can acknowledge that every life is worthwhile in the de re sense, and partly because they successfully explain that previous generations have the de dicto obligations towards future

Read More
1952 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction Human rights are rights that are entitled to every individual regardless of nationality and citizenship as it is inherent, inalienable, and universal. The presence of basic human rights are vital in upholding a civilized society. The idea of having individual rights and freedom is not a new concept in Britain, in fact it has very deep roots. History shows landmark advancements such as Magna Carta 1215, Habeas Corpus Act 1679, and Bill of Rights and Claim of Rights 1689 all had important roles in protecting citizen’s rights.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

On the legal grounds, the act of humanitarian intervention is still debatable, On the one hand, there was a responsibility to limit the use of force to self-defense according to the UN Charter. On the other hand, there was strong international pressure to abide by commitments to human rights and the right to life. This has constitute tensions in an international law system, Humanitarian intervention as the justifiable act to intervene while it is contrary to the principle of sovereignty and nonintervention in the UN system and international law. An evolving international norms related to human rights and the use of force.

Read More

More about Universality Of Human Rights Argument Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document