Jonathan Wolff’s article primary addresses the unfair treatment of social and economic rights, emphasizing on the current global health crisis in particular; it disputes human rights not equally prioritized. He then poses a challenging but essential question: “How can there be a human right to health if the resources are just not there to satisfy it?” He obviously takes to heart the necessity of good health care as a natural right for humans and he believes it should be legally our right to have a good health system. His believe can draw once mind to reevaluate Franklin Roosevelt's 1941 speech in which he alleged that the “four freedoms”—freedom of speech and worship, and freedom from fear and want—are basic human rights. Wolff construes, the right to health is a human right as reported by the Declaration of Human Rights. The article suggests the idea of a …show more content…
He then squabbled that rights tackles the distribution of power and statues; thus, rights will “check and balance” the two conventions of rights instead of depending on humanitarian aid. He furthered to annotate that the distinction between humanitarian aid and rights is vital; rights are power according to Wolff. He conveyed that, “rights give permanence and power, whereas humanitarianism seems uncertain and temporal”.
He indicated that there are many principal logics for human rights and the understanding situation and human rights are continuously deriving as we perceive more about the human condition. Human rights protection is alleged as an international affair and our rights values are euro-centrically influenced, according to the article. Jonathan Wolff’s article advocates for the need of balancing and protecting human rights, especially the second-generation rights as they are equally, if not the most essential to the first-generation