ipl-logo

Argument Vs Cosmological Argument

1369 Words6 Pages

Since the beginning of time, people have believed in a higher being. Most recently in the last few thousands of years many believe and have refuted the existence of God. The argument of the existence of God will go on until human-kind cease to exist. Everyone has their own opinion on this topic and have reasoning to support their claims. One of many groups of the argument for the existence of God are the Cosmological Arguments. Some of the main supporters for the Cosmological argument were Spinoza, Aristotle, Plato, Aquinas, and Averroes. Each theorist structured their argument by beginning with the empirical fact that the universe exist and conclude with their argument by explaining why God was responsible for it.
Aristotle was a firm believer of that all movement depends of there being a mover. Movement …show more content…

Aristotle claimed that everything eternal must be good because there is no defect to something that exist necessarily. Badness is caused by the lack of something, a something that has to be there, which Aristotle claimed that God most perfectly has. One huge proponent that Aristotle claims is that God exist but doesn’t know the physical world we live in today. God only knows about himself, God is not affected by us or has any plans for us with this claim it can show why God is never changing. Baruch Spinoza is one of the most radical philosophers in history. Spinoza uses the combination of Cartesian metaphysics and epistemological principles in his thinking which leads to his extreme naturalistic view on God. Spinoza pictures God as the infinite, necessarily existing, and a unique substance in the universe. Spinoza and Descartes have a similar argument on the existence of the universe, mainly using substances to explain. Where they differ is Spinoza believes there’s only one substance whereas Descartes believes there are two or three if you include God. The only substance in the universe is God, everything

Show More
Related

Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay

590 Words | 3 Pages

Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause of existence His defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument revolves mostly around the second premise. This is mostly due to him finding the first premise as intuitively obvious, where he claims that “no one, seriously denies it”. From experience, we find that physical objects do not come into existence without causes.

Read More

William Lane Craig's Cosmological Argument

296 Words | 2 Pages

I think William Lane Craig made a strong argument when it came to a cosmological argument. He does have a point that there is an explanation of how the world came to be but there is more to it, such as dates and things like that. He says that the ultimate question in philosophy would be “why does anything exists”? He brings up that atheist think that the universe is eternal but he says there is reasons why the universe began. He says its obscured to think that its number of past events is infinite, which he says leads to self-contradictions.

Read More

Ockham's Razor And Cosmological Argument

1241 Words | 5 Pages

Faith is the root of many actions and thereby reactions in our society, and world today. These religious practices must go through many trials and questionings from the always cynical, ever searching individuals. Due to the questioning of God’s existence, St. Thomas Aquinas and Anselm devised three arguments as was of explanation for His existence. Ontological, cosmological and teleological arguments are put forth to hopefully one day prove God’s existence. We are a people who crave for simplicity, there is nothing simple about the devout in their faith, we will look to find simpler explanations, or Ockham’s razor, for the three arguments put forth by Aquinas and Anselm.

Read More

William Craig Cosmological Argument

1022 Words | 5 Pages

In William Craig’s ‘kalam’ version of the cosmological argument he argues that “the universe has a cause of its existence.” His argument relies on two crucial premises which state that “whatever begins to exist has a cause of its existence” and “the universe began to exist” (Craig). In this paper, I will begin by breaking down Craig’s take on the cosmological argument. I will then propose an objection to his argument that questions why there must be a cause of the beginning of the universe, and furthermore, why this cause must be God. I will conclude with a response Craig would give to this objection.

Read More

Mccloskey On The Cosmological Argument Essay

1353 Words | 6 Pages

a. McCloskey refers to the arguments as “proofs” and often implies that they can’t definitively establish the case for God, so therefore they should be abandoned. What would you say about this in light of Foreman’s comments in his “Approaching the Question of God’s Existence” presentation? Proof an argument that is rationally convincing to everyone p 76 II. On the Cosmological Argument: a. McCloskey claims that the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being [i.e., a necessarily existing being].” Using Evans and Manis’ non-temporal form of the Cosmological argument start off by all and anything in the universe does not have to exist.

Read More

Schleiermacher's Defense Of Christianity In Baruch Spinoza

655 Words | 3 Pages

Spinoza believed that the God that is portrayed in the Bible is a “God that is highly immoral and arbitrary so we have an additional reason to doubt that religion based on revelation can give us an accurate

Read More

Overview Of The Notion Of Substance Propounded By Baruch Spinoza

2161 Words | 9 Pages

God, consequently, is realer than us, its properties. Spinoza criticizes Descartes for his confusion with what is relative as absolute, just like he takes infinite perfection as absolute infinity. Absolute infinity is the sufficient reason of infinite perfection and power is the sufficient reason of the quantity of reality. The Cartesian axiom declares that there is as much formal reality in the cause of an idea as the objective reality of the idea itself. Spinoza debunks the idea with his axioms of powers: “The power of Thought to think about or to comprehend things, is not greater than the power of Nature to exist and to act.”

Read More

Richard Taylor's Cosmological Argument Essay

1307 Words | 6 Pages

Richard Taylor’s Cosmological Argument consists of many aspects that explain conditions in which God, the universe, the earth and all the other planets, and the living beings of Earth, exist. As Taylor stated there is really only a sufficient reason as to why something exists in which he follows up by stating that the universe requires an explanation as to why it exists. This means though people who don’t really think about why the universe does exist or how it exists, but there is a reason as to how it came to be or why it exists. This is where sufficient reason comes in. It helps give an explanation to something that exists.

Read More

Evaluate The Cosmological Argument

188 Words | 1 Pages

the cosmological argument seems to be successful in both its first and second stages that the cosmos exists and it has a first cause. Its third point the first cause is God is more contentious, but it is far from easy to decline. Aquinas ' appreciation of God is a practical one God is not just an appropriate thing that might or might not exist. God is existence in its accomplishment or completeness. accepting that our compassionate accessible us on to such an existence is a common aspiration for do we not all want to know a more perfect reality?

Read More

Jean Paul Sartre Lord Of The Flies

1920 Words | 8 Pages

He developed a method or a stage of five arguments for the existence of God. Jean-Paul Sartre spent his life living as an atheist and giving reason for not needing a god. Aquinas’ cosmological arguments for existence of God are as follows: 1. Motion or a “Prime Mover”, aka God. 2.

Read More

Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument

1444 Words | 6 Pages

The cosmological argument looks to the world to prove God’s existence rather than pure definitions. The proponent of the cosmological argument was St. Thomas Aquinas, a theologian in the eleventh century CE (Solomon). He proposed that everything that exists must have a cause, and that the cause was God (Aquinas). Aquinas’ first point was based off of motion, that nothing can be both the mover and moved. An item sitting in place has the potential to be moving, but cannot move unless something that is already moving imparts motion to it

Read More

Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument

1784 Words | 8 Pages

The traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that

Read More

What Is Spinoza's View Of Substance Dualism

1744 Words | 7 Pages

Baruch Spinoza’s geometric structured view on the universe, and everything in general, is beautifully broken down for present and future thinkers to ponder in his work, Ethics. Although complex at times, his method of demonstrating each discoveries of proved proposition aids readers to conceptual God-Nature. At the base of these propositions are definitions and axioms (truths) Spinoza accounts as certain truths and are critical to understanding God-Nature (substance). I will here provide an account of Spinoza’s substance monism and attribute pluralism, along with strengths and weaknesses in his arguments for this picture of reality.

Read More

Spinozian God Research Paper

959 Words | 4 Pages

The differences that I perceive between religious God and Spinozian God are that, he presented the fundamental elements of what he depicted as a God. For him God is the infinite, necessarily existing, the only substance in the universe which has infinite attribute which is infinite in number. Spinoza gave four arguments to prove existence of God or Nature: • Infinite substance is clear and distinct idea, we are finite and god is infinite, then we cannot reached to infinity to know whether there is god or not, so the idea of god is absolutely free from any type of contradiction as when we cannot contradict then it existence can’t be questioned, hence existence of god is possible • As finite being, we are only producing finite being then we are going down the finite as but world is infinite. • World is infinite, which contain so

Read More

God's Not Dead Analysis

915 Words | 4 Pages

Dominican philosopher and theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas, created the “Five Ways” of God’s existence – motion, causation, contingency, gradations, intelligence of design – in which the first two are cosmological arguments. Aquinas’s argument from motion states that it’s obvious some things in the universe are moving, and if they’re moving, something else must have caused them to move, and something else must have caused that to move… and so on. However, the pattern of movements can’t go on forever since there wouldn’t be that one thing that started the whole series. Therefore, there must be an “initial mover, an extraordinary being that started the universe moving but is not itself moved by anything else – and this being we call God,” (Vaughn, Lewis. Pg. 65).

Read More

More about Argument Vs Cosmological Argument

Related Topics

Open Document