A Yes for No Guns!
Should the 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution be repealed or amended? That's the big question! The amendment should stay but more gun control should be added. It would save thousands of lives a year. There is roughly 31 thousand people a year that die some way involving a gun. Limiting guns and making more gun laws would change that number for the better. The US would be safer, homes would be safer, and all in all people's lives would be safer. There are very few gun laws out right now so there is room for improvement.
The 2nd Amendment reads, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of Free states, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” That is saying
…show more content…
But it’s not enough there is an estimate of 270 million to 310 million guns in the United States. Some are for police and some are for people who need them from protection or for hunting. But many of them are for gang members or people who plan on robbing a place or someone who plans on killing another. Gun help people in many ways but 31,537 people would be here if the US had more gun laws. I’m not saying take them all away, my family loves to hunt and we need guns to hunt. I’m saying be more strikes don’t sell as many, do better background checks, and don’t let so many get out to gangs...something! Basically gun control means less shootings, deaths and injuries. Don’t take them away just limit them for an even safer living environment to some. Even with the gun laws already out many people get hurt somehow they just aren’t working. More should be added and the old should be changed. I want people to be able to go hunting or old woman to have guns to protect them from robbers, but I do not want a mentally ill person to have a gun or someone who is involved or around