ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Checks And Balances

468 Words2 Pages

Separation of Powers has proven to accentuate the Constitution’s intentions and maintain the rights of the people. Fabricated by Baron de Montesquieu, this structure is woven into the government to entail specific responsibilities upon each branch. This system thoroughly defines the boundaries for each unit of government to ensure tyranny remains dormant and that people are inevitably sovereign. Separation of Powers is incessantly purposeful in present day for a myriad amount of reasons. Overall, it supports people’s natural rights regarding the Constitution and terminates tyranny. Incorporating Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances into the government alleviated the Founders of tyrants whom adamantly thought themselves nearly parallel …show more content…

Frequently, events occur that only reinforce the magnitude of Separation of Powers, such as the harassment ensued by the IRS. As documented, “The IRS has allegedly abused its power as a tax agency to intimidate Conservation groups, and possibly even sway election results. The Attorney General’s office has been caught spying on reporters, threatening freedom of the press, etc.” If this sinister behavior persists, people’s morality ebbs away. This abuse offends a multitude of amendments engraved in the Constitution. Checks and Balances are intertwined throughout the government precisely for disruptions like this. It acts as a regulator between any origins of supremacy to guarantee no one overrides an opposing authoritative group. Due to these factors, Checks and Balances and Separation of Powers deserve a lengthy reign, for it bears morality and emphasizes reason behind the U.S. Constitution. Separation of Powers is imperative to the functionality of society, the government, and the Constitution because it’s teeming with crucial principles and liberates the nation of tyrants. Absence of this system of government makes documents, such as the Bill of Rights, ineffectual without Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances to fortify its claims. It’s to the government’s best wishes that it remain in command as long as this nation may

Show More
Related
647 Words | 3 Pages

One of the ways that the United States guarded against cruel and oppressive government or rule was that they made the three branches of government. These three branches were the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch. This helped guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because “they were separate and distinct powers.” (Doc B) This would help to guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because all of these powers were separated so there wasn’t one overpowering government.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism guards against tyranny, so does the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each guard in different, unique ways. All of them do the same job to guard against tyranny. Federalism divides the government into the state and central governments. The division of powers gives each branch of government equal power, while checks and balances allows each branch to check each other.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

By splitting the power into a central and state governments, as well as dividing powers into three distinct branches, gaining all power became a feat much harder to achieve. By establishing a checks and balances system, no type of tyranny could even begin to form within a branch without being stopped by another. Finally, all states were given the representation they deserve, therefore stopping any one group from gaining too much power. With all the separation and limitations placed on all areas of the government any type of corruption can only go so far before being immediately

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

In Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense”, he said it’s absurd for an island to rule over a continent. This is especially true when Great Britain imposed tyrannic and restrictive laws on the colonies, so the founding fathers of the new independent country created the new constitution in a way the would prevent tyranny in the newly independent United States. The Articles of Confederation was the first plan of government for the newly formed U.S. The Articles were to weak to support a nation properly, so the new constitution began to form. How does the Constitution , a plan of government, guard against the government abusing its power.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

“The accumulation of all powers… in the same hands, whether one, a few, or many… may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny. ”-James Madison. Fifty-five delegates, from the thirteen states, met in Philadelphia in May of 1787 to discuss and revise the Articles of Confederation. The chief executive and the representatives worked to create a frame for what is now our Constitution. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in four ways; Federalism that creates a State and Federal government, Separation of Powers that gives equal power to the three branches, Checks and Balances that create balance in the three branches by checking each other and being checked and the Small States vs the Big States ensures an equal voice for all states no matter what their size.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

1.) What does Madison mean by the term “Faction”? What is a modern term we would use today? Madison uses the term faction to refer to groups of individuals arguing not for the rights or good of the community as a whole, but rather that which would benefit those who hold similar positions or interests. Different factions represent different ideas, leading to conflict and debate.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

When the colonists were still with Great Britain, King George III misused his power. As a result, colonists wrote the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, to the king, to state their separation from Great Britain, to form a new country, the United States of America. After creating a new country, Americans wrote the Articles of Confederation in the year 1777, which they purposely weakened central government, so the abuse of power, wouldn’t exist. This meant the states had all the power. Although this structure of government seemed great, the creators of the Articles quickly realized that with no central government, states weren’t united because they were busy on increasing the growth of only their state.

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

As James Madison stated, “ The accumulation of all powers… in the same hands… may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” However, if you separate this power between multiple branches of government it provides a fairly effective safeguard against one person or group gaining too much power over the other. Also, along side with these separations, each appointed government official serves a certain term. After this term they either have to run again or cannot be in that position again. This protects against tyranny because without the ability to serve a full lifetime, it becomes extremely difficult to gain too much

Read More
323 Words | 2 Pages

Separation of Powers is the division of powers into three branches. In Document B it explains that the legislative branch makes laws, the executive branch enforces laws, and the judicial branch passes them. This evidence explains how the Constitution guards against tyranny because it separates the powers of the government and it makes sure that no branch has more power than the other.

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

Judging from their conduct in previous years, the branches of our government seem to be suffering from an identity crisis. It was used to be expected, harshly speaking, that the congress would pass laws, the President would execute them, and the Supreme Court would interpret them into individual cases. This was the political framework established by the Constitution and attached to for the better part of our political history. However, it isn’t the way the federal government works. And as digression from the Constitution’s plan grows more common, a more permanent deranging of the American political system becomes more predictable.

Read More
1561 Words | 7 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was formed 223 years ago. Since 1787, a lot has changed. We grew as a country, technology advanced, and we elected 43 different presidents. One of witch, being the first African-American President in history. Due to its age, some may argue that the Constitution is irrelevant to today’s problems.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

By allowing the judicial branch to interpret the law so that the executive branch can implement and enforce it, the United States government has found a way to combat this issue caused by divided government. Though divided government has been known to create problems, they can be overcome. Solutions such as these can keep the government functioning

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.

Read More
1584 Words | 7 Pages

Separation of powers refers to the idea that the major body of a state should be functioned independently and that no individual of a state should have power separately. Therefore, separation of powers means that splitting up of responsibilities into different divisions to limit any one branch from expurgating the functions of another. The intention of the doctrine is to prevent the application of powers and provide for checks and balances of governing a state. It is a doctrine of constitutional law under which the three branches of government, executive power, legislative power, and judicial power are been kept separately to prevent abuse of power.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Checks And Balances

Related Topics

Open Document