Argumentative Essay On Child Support

The most memorable day in my life was me sitting in the courtroom of Alabama Family Courthouse I feel the walls closing in on me, when the judge calls for the next case. I was married for 13 years and have 3 children. After years of trying at my marriage it fell apart and was soon divorced. I was in court today for their 3 year review of child support. I left Alabama because there was no work there for my industry and moved to Texas. As it stands now I pay so much in support because Alabama set child support based upon the joint Combined Adjusted Gross Income between both parents and amount is figured by the guidelines table (Child Support Laws State by State, 2010). This has me worried because my ex-wife is not working, which means that

One thing to remember about the guidelines is that while these are establishing to help with the amount that should be paid, it is ultimately in the judge’s decision that is hearing the case. Each state determines on how child support will be monitored. The three department that can establish, enforce, modify are legislative statute, administrative rule, or judicial rule. Legislative stature is where the legislation of the state can make laws on anything that they have the power to govern. The states that used legislative statue is California, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming. Administrative rule is government agencies established to regulate social, political and economic cultures. The states using administrative rule are Connecticut, Maine, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Wisconsin. Judicial law is when a judge has the authority to make and interpret certain laws. The states using judicial rule are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. The enforcement for each state follow the

You are asking yourself,” How would this help both the custodial and non-custodial parent out?” The first thing that centralized child support would do is create a guide that is fair to all parties. Child was not established to “punish” the non-custodial parent. It was established to benefit the child or children involved with both parties. Child support is supposed to provide the basic essentials need for living. This is includes but not limited to shelter, water, electric, food and clothes. The second thing that centralized child support would help in creating a data base that is currently updated with non-custodial whereabouts and if they are current on the support payments. This data base would help with the enforcement of paying and local officials to locate the non-custodial parent when payments have not been made. Many non-custodial parents believe now that if they move to a different state, that they are not responsible for paying child support in the state that it was originally set up. Another reason centralizing child support would be helpful is during the 36 month review. The way child support is set up now and the non-custodial does live in a different state, the non-custodial parent must make a trip to appear in court during the review. This entails taking time off work, travel expenses and sometime requiring an attorney. If child support