Have you ever listened to a news story and thought it sounded one-sided? Or have you thought the news didn't seem to report the whole story or the most important aspect of a story? Journalists possess the power to influence a whole group of people with their work. When writers input their opinion, they generate bias. Consecutively, this influences a reader's reaction to a topic.
Everyday people gather around their viewing or listening devices to hear what they believe to be the truth. However, a lot of today’s news has been passed down to us in the form of gossip and rumors. It has also been observed that even in education it does not stop people from sharing information that is not known to be true. Spreading rumors, can have an Bell 3 adverse effect for those who are impacted, rumors can be outright painful and almost impossible to ignore – especially if social media is envolved with spreading it. It is a on going practice in today’s world to speak without thinking, and believing in rumors that are not confirmed.
On July 22, 1905, Florence Kelley delivered a passionate speech on child labor at the convention of the National Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia. Her primary audience for this speech was the social activists at this convention, while her secondary audience was all American citizens. Throughout her speech, Kelley uses a variety of rhetorical devices to encourage people to fight against child labor and to argue for women’s suffrage. In the first half of Kelley’s speech, she employs a solemn tone as she describes the current condition of child labor in the United States.
Rodrigues continues by informing us of how people can be susceptible to believing in false rumors, as well as some of the reasons why we believe them. In an effort to support his case, Rodriguez references the works of other authors such as Cass Sunstein and Robert H. Knapp, both of which have explored the ways that our beliefs and worries affect our acceptance of false rumors. The spreading and believing in false rumors has always been and is still an issue in our society. People will always turn to rumors when things get complicated. The specific details of the rumors change from one rumor to the next, but the basic definition and causes will always be the same.
For example, Eli Pariser, in a TED talk, compares coming in contact with the right news to eating a healthy diet. He remarks, “the challenge with these kind of algorithmic filters, these personalized filters, is that because they’re mainly looking at what you click on first, it can throw off that balance, and instead of a balanced information diet, you can end up surrounded by information junk food.” The American public should view the filter bubble and the fake news people encounter through it as a problem similar to nutrition, and strive for, so to say, “a healthy
This past month, the Pacific Northwest has been on fire. Wildfires in this area have been devastating to families, firefighters, ranchers, animals, and so many others. While firefighters fight viciously to contain these fires, there is another war that is going on at the same time; integrity in media. During these fires, newspapers and various news stations supplied the public with half-truths and exaggerations.
“If we learn nothing from this tragedy, we learn that life is short and there is no time for hate.” This quote comes from Sandy Dahl , the wife of the pilot on flight 93. When thinking about 9/11 this quote comes to mind because on that particular day, the world was reminded how short life really is. This quote also intertwines with 9/11 because it teaches us how there is no time to hate, but to move forward and help each other hand in hand. Even though I was only a year old when September 11th happened, I want to understand this horrific event that went down in history of the United States.
American Voice Essay America is a place where many people can speak up about anything. Anyone can speak about what they want to change and this is called the American voice. Patrick Henry best represents the american voice in his speech,” Give me Liberty or Give me Death” by showing how people want to be free no matter what
Misinformation has had no better outlet than the internet, spawning and being spread by millions of users daily. Like an epidemic, false information spreads throughout the population, infecting the minds of the people that encounter it, however, it is easy to debunk misinformation using logic and proactive research. So, if information is relatively simple to validate, why is false information being readily believed and advocated for by large parts of the population? The answer is that the polarization of politics has given almost every issue a bias and persuasive edge. Organizations, government representatives, and prominent individuals utilize rhetoric that insight anger and anxiety that leaves the public vulnerable to the embracement of misinformation.
To say we live in decisive times is an understatement; we can hardly go a day without hearing about the next big political scandal. No matter what side one stands on one thing is clear: The other side is wrong. It’s a divide that’s been plaguing the nation, but it's easy to understand when considering how each side deals with information. Often, studies suggest, that it comes down to being a case of facts versus feelings. As it happens, there's a term for a leader whose platform is based on stirring up feelings, and the term is demagogue.
Dr. Marty Klein Recap: Legitimate scientific research is often discounted by politicos proclaiming that the issue is “controversial” even when there is a clear-cut consensus among recognized scientists. Consider the so-called debates about the harmful effects of tobacco or climate change, or how IUDs and emergency contraceptives work. Combined, those high-profile issues (and others--fluoride in city water, etc.) are often identified as issues of phony controversy--as they were in a National Geographic magazine cover story, “The War on Science” (March, 2015). For a good example of that ploy we also have Jeb Bush’s (a potential 2016 presidential candidate) comments about climate change. Bush said that “he wasn’t a scientist” but nevertheless he believes the “science” of human-caused climate change was “convoluted,” and questioned the degree to which carbon emissions are responsible.
According to TIME, if you receive your information from social media, you are most likely being exposed to hoaxes, rumors, and misleading news. Previous studies have shown that false information is just as likely and fast to go viral as reliable information is (Time.com). Every person in the world has been exposed to misinformation and false accusations at a time in their life. The media, once stated before, plays a vital role in the distribution of that false information.
As a result, people have created a vicious cycle in which they search, read, believe, and share what they have read, without considering the reliability of the information and news. Technology has influenced communication and journalism; as a result, the media has adopted a business model based on clicks and advertising. The combination of people 's need for information and the greed of news corporations have allowed for the proliferation of “fake news,” a term that has gained importance in the last two years. Fake news is “completely made up, manipulated to resemble credible journalism and attract maximum attention and, with it, advertising revenue” (Hunt, 2016). News has the power to alter people’s perceptions which can impact their decisions related to economy, democratic process, and their lives and jobs.
Furthermore, fake news can be disseminated rapidly. Due to the widespread use of social media,
Throughout the past ten years, social media has increasingly become a phenomenon all over the world. In the United States alone, 81% of the population owns some sort of social media account (“Percentage of U.S. population”). With this increasing number, social media has reached an extremely large audience in which resulted in a melting pot of diverse discussions on daily topics. Due to this enormous audience, one must be quite cautious about what they share online. These platforms have become a useful tool that may result in real-life consequences if used in an inefficient way.
