ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Fourth Amendment

973 Words4 Pages

Technology has seemed to overtake our lives with people looking for the newest and best model cell phone. The first cell phones were bricks that only had one purpose, to call someone. Today, we house everything on our cell phone from pictures to phone numbers to our itineraries. We have personal conversations with others via text message. People tend to guard these devices with their lives as they do not want others to see what is on them. For police, the information stored on a person's cellular device can be used as evidence to convict a person of a crime. The fourth amendment requires police to obtain a warrant to search unless they have probable cause or reason to believe the item poses a threat to the officer's safety. Is probable cause enough though to allow them to search a device that might contain more details about a person than can be found in their home? The information …show more content…

The interpretation of the fourth amendment is what allows police to get away with searching without a warrant. The source I will be using to introduce the fourth amendment is the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of the Constitution written by the founding father's of the United States. They wrote these amendments to protect the rights as Americans. The fourth amendment, as stated in the Bill of Rights is, “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”. I will also present the premise that if a cell phone a cell phone does not pose a threat to an officer and is handled properly, an officer does not have reason to search without a

Show More
Related

Summary: Carpenter V. United States

576 Words | 3 Pages

In the article produced by Damon Root, the Indiana Supreme Court stated this, “ Cellphones are double- edged swords, increasing convenience at the expense of privacy.” Although an electronic device may help a consumer in an everyday life,privacy is cut short considering that most of the storage in a device is not protected. As consumers put their information out on the internet, it is for everyone to see. One statement from the Supreme court said this, “What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection.” As a person releases information to the public, exposing themself to whoever is allowed to see, they are opening a window to their personal

Read More

Supreme Court Case Of Timothy Carpenter

1800 Words | 8 Pages

A warrant is not needed in the search of the cell phone records. The Fourth Amendment is not violated as the cell phone records are not showing the exact location and conversations of the cell phone user, but just rather the tower that the phone was connected too. The location of the tower only indicates that the cell phone user is within a certain radius from the tower. The user before getting a cellphone usually knows that their phones are connected to the towers, and the information that is present in a cell phone record is usually shared within a company for reasons such as product development to marketing or to know where weak spots exist in the network and where roaming charges must be applied. Therefore, the use of cell phone records without a warrant is not violating the Fourth amendment, as the information coming from the records is information that the user knows that they are sharing with the cellphone provider

Read More

Riley Vs California Research Paper

833 Words | 4 Pages

“Riley v. California”) Bensur and Brokamp say in their article that in court, Riley claimed that his Fourth Amendment right was violated because the officers did not have probable cause also called reasonable suspicion to examine his phone. The case went to the Supreme Court and the judges agreed that the police had acted

Read More

Riley Vs Robinson Case Study

1619 Words | 7 Pages

A persons’ privacy goes well beyond just what is commonly expected based on human nature. Privacy needs to be taken seriously due to the dangerous effects that can come about if there is an intrusion. So, for the courts to not address the blatantly obvious concerns of privacy due to cellular phones would be highly misjudged. Further, even though there is a better chance now with legislation to make strides in the realm of cellular data protection in relation to the Fourth Amendment, if it is not worked on and if we do not progress, generations to come will do nothing but further suffer (David Leon Riley, v. CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, v. BRIMA WURIE, 2014; Dee,

Read More

Riley Vs California Case Study

1596 Words | 7 Pages

Supreme Court Report Was the searching of a man’s cell phone data without a warrant from an officer a violation of the fourth amendment? The case that deals with this serious problem is the case of Riley v. California. Riley v. California deals not only with search warrants but also the exceptions that are associated with search warrants. Search warrants for policemen and other government agencies has been a big topic of discussion for years now.

Read More

David Riley Case

619 Words | 3 Pages

According to The American Library Association, cell phones have now evolved into sophisticated personal computers and withhold the inner most private thoughts. Information and data such as books currently read, which websites that had been visited, and personal conversations between family and friends. The Association also argues that constitutional protections will have been surrendered if police offers are allowed to conduct a warrantless search of a cell phone, because more than half of Americans in the country own a smartphone. The Petitioner debates that a cellphone should be viewed as a window to person’s mind and that due to the advancement of electronics should not be confiscated and rummaged through without a

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Stingray In The United States

674 Words | 3 Pages

The judge in the specific Milwaukee case stated that “A person wanted on probable cause (and an arrest warrant) who is taken into custody in a public place where he had no legitimate expectation of privacy cannot complain about how the police learned his location” This argument doesn’t make much sense if you change it to be about something other than a phone. If the police searched the man’s house without a warrant in order to learn his location, then in court any evidence that they obtained within the house would be thrown out. The judge is pretty much

Read More

David Riley Case

713 Words | 3 Pages

Zanders’ case went to the Supreme Court. The court had said, “ Zanders presumptively knew that his phone makes and receives calls by sending signals to towers, and that Sprint keeps records of these signals for business purposes like billing and tracking tower usage.” Because of these statements, the ruled that the Fourth Amendment offers them no protection. So while people say that when police look through a persons’ electronic device it is invading their privacy, anything stored on one of these devices is not private. Nor is it a search when the information is shared with third

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Fourth Amendment

785 Words | 4 Pages

The Fourth Amendment is “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.” In other words, it is against the law for police to search any person without probable cause and an issued warrant. (Cartoon Surveillance) This protects the privacy of the innocent people that may not be considered guilty. However, giving the people a right to a warrant is only giving them an advantage, while the police and the government have a disadvantage.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

1473 Words | 6 Pages

The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of people to be secure in their houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,

Read More

Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule

1034 Words | 5 Pages

In the United States, there are many times in which police officers conduct illegal searched and seizures, in hopes of finding evidence that will get an accused a conviction. Under the Fourth Amendment, individuals have a right to be protected from such situations. In 1957, there was a case in which police received a tip from an informant in regard to a bombing and the suspect responsible for the recent bombings (Peak, K. & Everett, P., 2016). The police went to the woman's home and forced themselves in to obtain any evidence that they could find. Evidence was found at the home and the woman was later convicted.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment

427 Words | 2 Pages

Cell phone can unveil information within our call history, text messages, pictures, and even internet searches. Access to our cell phones is like access to our lives. No matter how much time passes, the fourth amendment continues to

Read More

Probable Cause In Law

1385 Words | 6 Pages

probable cause is to be clearly established by law enforcement in order to conduct a legal search of your property or your person. Consent from the individual to allow the search can substitute the probable cause, if none exists for law enforcement to act upon. This is applicable to individual searches, vehicle searches and searches of your home or any other property. For example, if law enforcement stops you exiting a convenience store and suspects you of shoplifting, they must first establish the probable cause or reasonable suspicion to detain you lawfully.

Read More

Benefits Of The Fourth Amendment

752 Words | 4 Pages

Electronic surveillance is also under the Fourth Amendment, so the law enforcement cannot watch you with any type of electronics of any sort. Furthermore, your personal items: backpack, house, or phone are considered your property so the law enforcement can search any of them without the citizen’s permission or proved as reasonable. Although of all of the advantages of the Fourth Amendment, a disadvantage is that for the law enforcement it makes accumulating evidence

Read More

The Importance Of Invasion Of Privacy In Education

321 Words | 2 Pages

Furthermore, they should have permit to search you. According to Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, “ that police officers should have to obtain a warrant. ”A warrant is required to search a person. It is stated so in the Fourth Amendment. So if this is correct, then police officers should not be able to pull people over, just to check their personal device.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Fourth Amendment

Related Topics

Open Document