ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Welfare Drug Testing

738 Words3 Pages

The United States economy is in trouble and the economy statewide is not doing any better. In rough times like these those elected into public office are put under extreme pressure to try and alleviate the problems. Different people have different ideas of ways to fix the economy, and drug testing before receiving welfare is one of them that is still not agreed upon. Welfare drug testing has been a highly debated topic in the U.S. for quite some time now. There are plenty of opinions that agree and disagree with the drug tests, but real statistics uncover the hard truth about the success of welfare drug testing.
To start with, there are holes in the drug testing laws themselves. The laws were made in a way that protects the children of parents who are drug abusers. To accomplish this the children are given a way to still receive that money even if their parent does not qualify for the welfare support. For example, if a parent tests positive for drug abuse the money that the kids need will be given to a trusted family member to ensure that the kids are taken care of. It seems like a good way to protect and take care of the helpless …show more content…

When people talk about welfare drug testing it seems like there is a large amount of drug abusers who are trying to receive assistance. That is not the case. Statistics show that there was not a substantial amount of positives applying for welfare in the first place. The statistics were from states who enforce welfare drug testing and they showed that an average of one percent of applicants tested positive for drugs. That number is a whole lot smaller than what the public makes it out to be. With numbers that small the cost to have the drug tests done costed more than the amount saved by denying them welfare checks. Spending more money on the drug tests is not helping the economy and is a good reason to put them to

Show More
Related
904 Words | 4 Pages

In Why Drug testing Welfare Recipients Is a Waste of Taxpayer Money, Darlena Cunha works to persuade that drug testing welfare recipients feeds the stereotype stigma towards those asking for the extra assistance and is actually wasting the taxpayer’s money. As soon as the page opens, there is a large image of two gloved hands holding a drug test. The picture is dark and the light is focused on a blue urine test for Cannabis and an Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC). As a result, the image automatically gives the reader a serious and eery tone.

Read More
375 Words | 2 Pages

In Mark Jarman’s “Unholy Sonnet 1” the Trinity is represented though vivid images and language to illustrate that comprehending the Trinity is something out of a person understanding. Jarman, to provide the reader with the knowledge that he is talking about the Trinity refers to God in three ways in a single line, “Dear God, Heavenly Father, Gracious Lord” (1). This line shows the use of language to describe the Trinity which is made up of The Father, Son, and The Holy Spirit. Then the author goes on throughout the first half of the poem capitalizing words that relate to God to show each word as a pronoun, “Mother Love and Maker, Light Divine… Oasis That All Sands Are Running Toward” (1,8)

Read More
1814 Words | 8 Pages

Drug abuse often is rampant among the lower socio-economic classes. The bill will directly affect families whose benefits are decreased, specifically, the children of the parents who test positive for drugs. This policy seeks to deny aid to the recipients who are using drugs, but benefits will continue for minor children. However, they will continue to suffer because they are dependent on their parents for sustenance.

Read More
1288 Words | 6 Pages

If there is no new money put into the welfare system, the states are not going to be able to run the programs any better than they already are. The state of Wisconsin’s W2 program invested millions of dollars to support the kind of envisioned welfare reform. Money to get poor people to the jobs they’re required to find, money for health care, money for day care because single mothers cannot leave their young children home alone while they work, and money for job skills training, which welfare recipients need to find work in a competitive market.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

The Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) is an act initiated by Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin, and passed by Congress, to become law on August 3, 2010 (Phillips 2012 ). The FSA intent is to reduce the gap between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to initiate federal criminal penalties from a 100:1 weight ratio to an 18:1 weight ratio. The FSA also eliminates the five-year mandatory minimum sentence for the possession of crack cocaine (Reid 2012). The FSA replaced the controversial Anti-Drug Abuse Act (ADAA) of 1986, that was seen as a racially bias, expensive, and unfair legislation from the Reagan Administration 's “War on Drugs” from the mid 1980s ().

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

How are the messages the same? How are they different? How is the use of visual imagery the same or different? “In June of 1971 President Nixon officially declares a war on drugs, identifying drug abuse as public enemy number one. This declaration lead to the creation of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in July 1973.”

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

This is not a waste of money, and should instead be considered a responsibility of the federal and state governments. Employers who test their workers foot the bill for the expenses of drug screening. Therefore, the federal government should pay the expenses of drug testing their welfare recipients, since most people on welfare receive assistance in place of a job. Also, supporters of drug testing would much rather pay to make sure people are living productive, and healthy lifestyles (“The Pros and Cons…” para 3). It is unfair for those who work hard everyday to support their families, to have to support those who are not taking the necessary steps to be

Read More
1265 Words | 6 Pages

No Test, No Check Ronald Reagan said, “We should measure welfare’s success by how many people leave, not by how many are added.” People should find a way not to rely on the government for assistance unless it is truly needed. Welfare is defined as a program designed to help those in financial need or the unemployed by distributing goods or money. Welfare is made for those who need assistance for a short amount of time and is not meant to be long term. It is a privilege for those who are not financially stable enough to support themselves or their families.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

An article from The Washington Post, “The Double-Standard of Making the Poor Prove They’re Worthy of Government Benefits” by Emily Badger, conveys her insights on the double-standard that is put on citizens who receive welfare benefits. We don’t drug-test farmers who receive agriculture subsidies, college students who receive Pell Grants, and wealthy families who cash in on the home mortgage interest deduction (Badger). No one seems to give a second glance when the government hands out money to farmers, college students, and wealthy home-owners because, when compared to the portion of the population on welfare, society has taught us who is more likely to abuse drugs. In most cases, welfare recipients are given a check from the government about once a month. This is a clear-cut, easy to see benefit.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

How do you think the average American feels when he pays taxes to the government, just to know that it is going to people who use the money to buy drugs? According to Missouri, Oklahoma, Utah, Mississippi, Kansas, Tennessee, and Arizona only 10% of people receiving welfare are getting caught using drugs, the reason we only catch a small amount is the state government tells the recipients when they are drug testing them. In the technology we have today we can tell if a person is on drugs by three ways one way is urine, another way is blood and the last way is hair. These ways to drug test recipients are all efficient and effective. The most effective way is if you use hair to see if someone is using drugs you can usually tell for about 9 days it also depends on what drug they are using.

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

Thirty-five percent of Americans recieve help from welfare every day, and if we drug test them that number would suddenly drop. Some individuals claim that drug testing would help individuals by putting them into treatment; however, there are several reasons why drug testing would not help recipients. While drug testing could recognize the individuals who need help, problems would be caused such as impacts on the person, the cost, and other impacts such as on children and poverty levels. I A. First, drug testing will cause problems with the money people are receiving. If the test is positive the recipient will have reduced income and they may not get any income at all (US Department of Health and Human Services 8).

Read More
287 Words | 2 Pages

The question came up whether it is fair to judge a whole system just because some people abuse it? The response was you are not judging the whole system. What you are trying to do is make the system more trustworthy. By drug testing you are rewarding the good participants by making it easier for them to get their benefits. By getting rid of bad participants it will

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

According to Time.com during the four months, Florida drug tested welfare recipients only 2.6% of applicants tested positive. Drug testing results do not justify the cost of the test and is using money that could be used for something much more important. States are having to pay for an expensive drug test while getting less positive tests and more negative tests. The states that are

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

For example, Florida does not punish those who return positive tests; however, they require those who fail to not only lose benefits, but they are not reimbursed for the test they paid for. While only a select few states have implemented drug testing for their welfare recipients, the program is evidentially catching on throughout the nation. Over the past 20 years, 15 states have introduced these tests and as results as publicized, it is only a matter of time before others join in on this money saving tactic. As Oklahoma 's Rep. John Bennet said, "It is now undeniable that drug-testing

Read More
1113 Words | 5 Pages

Like the bike you bought after saving lawn-mowing money for a year, welfare reform was the prized trophy of the conservative governing philosophy. We believed that we’d found the vehicle of social mobility for poor Americans, once and for all. No one should live on taxpayer money without doing some work on their own, right? Everyone agrees, right? Wrong.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Welfare Drug Testing

Related Topics

Open Document