ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of State Assistance Drug Testing

766 Words4 Pages

State Assistance Drug Testing In 2012, $86.5 billion was given to SNAP, including a $3 billion contingency fund set aside for any unforeseen future expenses (Quick Facts 4). Not many people know just how vast the program actually is. As of January 2016, 45.4 million people were participating in SNAP (“SNAP: Frequently Asked Questions” para 2). All states offer food assistance programs like SNAP, but only 13 states require the recipients to undergo drug testing to qualify (Quick Facts 4). Therefore, there are 37 states that allow people to receive state assistance. This means there are thousands of people who are abusing the system by being irresponsible through the use of abusing drugs. American citizens who qualify for state assistance should …show more content…

In order to qualify for assistance, people must be: working for low wages or working part-time, unemployed, receiving welfare or other public assistance payments, elderly, homeless, or disabled with low-income (para 3). “The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) sets the rules for SNAP, but individual states run the program. The USDA also provides all the funding for the actual food benefits, while states are responsible for about half the cost of running the program,” (Cancio para 3). Since the state and the federal governments are paying for this program, people should be screened for drugs to prove they are not breaking the federal law about drug use. Illegal drug use is becoming a big issue in today’s society, therefore, most employers have started drug testing before …show more content…

This is not a waste of money, and should instead be considered a responsibility of the federal and state governments. Employers who test their workers foot the bill for the expenses of drug screening. Therefore, the federal government should pay the expenses of drug testing their welfare recipients, since most people on welfare receive assistance in place of a job. Also, supporters of drug testing would much rather pay to make sure people are living productive, and healthy lifestyles (“The Pros and Cons…” para 3). It is unfair for those who work hard everyday to support their families, to have to support those who are not taking the necessary steps to be

Show More
Related
904 Words | 4 Pages

In Why Drug testing Welfare Recipients Is a Waste of Taxpayer Money, Darlena Cunha works to persuade that drug testing welfare recipients feeds the stereotype stigma towards those asking for the extra assistance and is actually wasting the taxpayer’s money. As soon as the page opens, there is a large image of two gloved hands holding a drug test. The picture is dark and the light is focused on a blue urine test for Cannabis and an Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC). As a result, the image automatically gives the reader a serious and eery tone.

Read More
984 Words | 4 Pages

The information is completely factual on both opinions. In reality, drug testing would cost even more than us as taxpayers put in for TANF programs, and things of the like. It would only add to the amount we pay. The government wants to keep everyone happy, but they don’t want to raise taxes, and the people don’t want that either. It is still back and forth and not set in stone as to if they should implement drug testing.

Read More
1365 Words | 6 Pages

Anybody who is on drugs needs help to get off of them, and the welfare recipients would receive free help. The taxpayers that work for their money do not want to see their taxes go somewhere of no use. Welfare recipients that have been regularly drug-tested drug usage goes down. Drug testing welfare recipients would be beneficial to both the taxpayers and the welfare recipients. The taxpayers would feel more secure that their payments are not going to waste, and the welfare recipients

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

Why Should Welfare Recipients be Drug Tested Many politicians believe that testing welfare recipients is illegal. Others disagree and push for the act to be passed. Many argue the point that doing the testing is unconstitutional. Some say that will also cost the government lots of money. Others will argue that the testing benefits the government more than it hurts it.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

The total annual cost of food stamp program $69,800,000,000. Now, these social welfare programs are not a total complete failure they indeed do play a significant role in todays economy. If you were to eliminate these programs a countries economy would suffer because what taxpayers don't take into consideration is that if you have these high unemployment rate and homeless people and not providing them with some sort of assistance, there is going to have less consumer, and if there is less consumer, companies wont be making enough money to provide jobs, and if there is no workers companies wont be producing. So eventually the unemployment rate will increase even higher and economy will drop immensely. The social welfare programs help stabilize the government and prevent economical problems like the “great depression.”

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

Drug testing individuals is not worth the money in the end because most people will not test positive. Most people tend to forget that most people receiving aid also are taxpayers. In 2010, nearly half the poor mother or near poor mothers were at least working part time (Cunha). If the people receiving aid are paying for the drug tests to they would probably rather keep that money then have it be wasted. Drug testing recipients is a waste of money since the government would be wasting more money on giving the tests then they would be

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

If the government were to catch people using the money for drugs they would be taken out of the system and put into rehab or expelled from the welfare program, which proves that in the long run welfare recipients should be required to perform and pass a positive drug test to continue to receive welfare

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

It’s understandable that people will get fired or let go sometimes but they shouldn’t just be handed money until they die. I think that welfare should only be a temporary fix, like it was intended to be, not a life-long thing. Unemployed citizens should only be able to receive welfare check for a short period of time, long enough for them to be able to find a job. Welfare was meant to be a good system to help others during a hard time, but it was not meant to fund the unplowed until death, and it was not meant to put the working class in debt either. There are many small fixes to this problem, but not enough people who see that this systems rules and regulations need to be

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

Essentially, the war on drugs has demonstrated to be an exorbitant expense. The federal government in 2002 alone spent $18.822 billion in the form of expenditures such as treatment, prevention, and domestic law enforcement (CSDP, 2007, p. 54). However, given that the drug war has garnered meager results, this investment may be interpreted as a waste of taxpayer dollars. Alternatively, the money that has been allocated to arrest and detain drug offenders may also be a source of contention. CSDP (2007) “Of the 1,846,351 arrests for drug law violations in 2005, 81.7% (1,508,469) were for possession of a controlled substance.

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

There are many factual reasons on why people agree that drug testing welfare people is wrong. “Some who would have to undergo the drug testing are offended by the implication that simply because you are having financial problems

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

Those who feel the drug test should be sent to a rehab. The money they could have gotten to use on drugs could be used on rehab instead. When they have been clean they should have a required amount of time before they can re-apply to make sure they have actually changed. This would help drop drug abuse rates, and create some sense of help for those who want to change, but think there is no way. Once they have been cleared to apply for welfare again not only will they have a remarkable story to tell about how their life did a complete three sixty, but we would have a better feeling knowing those people will be spending their government money

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

Despite the government's “best” efforts, drug use and addiction rates continue to rise, and the criminalization of drug

Read More
3400 Words | 14 Pages

The welfare recipients should be drug tested so those people paying taxes have closer on where their hard earned money is going. Mandatory drug testing should be applied to the system. All the evidence is clear that people are making the mistake of using illicit drugs, losing their jobs, not being able to pay for anything, receiving welfare benefits, and then continue to use while getting free money from their state. Not only is it unfair to the taxpayers of America, but it is unfair to the people who are not using and are receiving welfare. By executing the drug users from the program they could use the extra money that they are spending on drugs to make the government system a more beneficial program.

Read More
1728 Words | 7 Pages

Substance abuse issues have been a part of the public assistance policy discussions for quite some time. Several states proposed drug testing or screening applicants and recipients of public welfare benefits since the federal welfare reform in 1996. With our economy being at such a low standpoint, it is getting harder for individuals to receive public assistance. To make it even harder, recently there has been at least twelve states legislators that have introduced the idea which requires drug testing for people who receive public assistance. These public assistance programs include welfare, unemployment, public housing, and Medicaid.

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

Drug testing has become a mandatory task in nearly every workplace, no employer would like to employ personnel with unacceptable habits of drug addiction. Employee drug testing is not about catching employees using drugs, it’s about preventing the use of drugs at the work place in order to maintain a healthy environment. Drug testing is a moral obligation and responsibility to keep the workplace safe for all the employees, customers and other related personnel. Common reasons employers implement drug testing is to- • Deter employees from abusing alcohol and drugs • Prevent hiring individuals who use illegal drugs • Be able to identify early and appropriately refer employees who have drug and/or alcohol problems • Provide a safe workplace

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of State Assistance Drug Testing

Related Topics

Open Document