Argumentative Essay: The Compromise Of 1850

681 Words3 Pages

Lastly, the legislation declared that fugitive slaves "escaping into any state or territory of the United States may be lawfully reclaimed and conveyed to the person claiming his or her labor or service", and that even if in the free territories, "slavery and involuntary slavery in the punishment of crimes" was permitted. While the compromise seemed to address the issue, it only went on to slowdown the war that was soon to come. Although the agreement incorporated in the Missouri Compromise maintained the balance of slave and non-slave states in the territories added to the Union in The Louisiana Purchase, the issue over slavery's expansion into new territories arose again following the Mexican War. The question of whether new territories …show more content…

The gravity surrounding the Wilmot Proviso split both Whigs and Democrats in congress along sectional lines. A man by the name of Henry Clay attempted to seek a compromise that would be appeasing to the Union. This compromise sought out by former senate member Henry Clay is known as The Compromise of 1850. The compromise of 1850 was also referred to as Clay’s …show more content…

Stephen Douglas a former member of the Senate, drafted a new guide for a resolution which was in turned called the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. Again, an attempt sent forth to eradicate the feud between north and south only let to more mishap. The Kansas- Nebraska Act caused a heap of dismay within the land. The Act led to a tragedy referred to as Bleeding Kansas, which was a period of violence during the settling of Kansas territory. The Act overturned the Missouri Compromise’s use of latitude as the boundary between slave and free territory and instead, relied on the principle of popular sovereignty, declared that the residents would determine whether the area became a free state or a slave