ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: The Power Of Gay Marriage In The United States

1101 Words5 Pages

The Federal government does not show much interest in the people, in reality all they seek is building a government in which things operate better than they have before. States are responsible for making sure that their people get what they want. It is clear that when it came down to gay marriage, state government should've been the one to make the decision of officially making it a law instead of the federal government. In my opinion when it comes to gay marriage, state government should have the power. The fact is that the federal government should put their opinion, however the state should have the last say and decide whether if they think it should be made a law or not. Especially when it came to gay marriage, federal government didn’t …show more content…

Not to mention “The tenth amendment gives specific powers to the federal government's, unfortunately anything it doesn't say is left up to the states.” Although it gave them the power to pass laws throughout the 50 states. This particular power should not be granted to them when they already have other things to worry about. Gay marriage is a very delicate topic which should be handled by someone closer to them who knows how they feel, something they don't have much connection to because they don't hold the same relation states do with people. It is said “Any power not listed, says the Tenth Amendment, is left to the states or the people.” Although the Tenth Amendment does not specify what these specific power may be, “the U.S Supreme Court has ruled that laws affecting family relations (Such as marriage, divorce, and adoption), commerce that occurs within a state’s own borders.”But we have to stop and think the founding fathers created a system they thought would work, however they never took in consideration things such as gay marriage was going to come. Saying that “ There are a lot of powers the constitution doesn't say anything about, one being marriage. Founding Fathers gave the Federal Government the right to pass laws throughout the whole 50 states. However the

Show More
Related

Case Study: Obergefell Vs. Hodges

1334 Words | 6 Pages

The case looks to the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause to determine whether same-sex couples have the right to marry, and whether the right to same-sex marriage is a fundamental right. The case was decided and the judges ruled in a 5-4 majority that it is Unconstitutional for states to deny same-sex couples the right to marry, or to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages that were performed out-of-state. Justices that voted in favor of the decision are Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. The dissenting Justices are Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and

Read More

14th Amendment Pros And Cons

444 Words | 2 Pages

But the states cannot deny any taxes levied by the government. Also the government has the right to declare war, but the states cannot.

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Bowers V. Hardwick (1986)

682 Words | 3 Pages

Rule: The Supreme Court mandated in favor of the state of Georgia; Homosexual sexual activities were ruled to be neither “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” or “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.” (pp. 506) Despite what the Court of Appeals found, no previous cases of the Court had supported that the Constitution allowed for an expansion of privacy towards homosexual sodomy. In fact, homosexual acts were criminal acts under the common law, and were prohibited in the laws that were established in the thirteen states during the approval of the Bill of Rights. Homosexual sodomy was also illegal under the laws in almost all states, excluding five, around the time the Fourteenth Amendment was signed, and in 1961 in all fifty states.

Read More

Al. V. Hodges Supreme Court Case Study

2162 Words | 9 Pages

Hodges decision. Ideally, “federalism promotes choice, competition, participation, experimentation, and the diffusion of power,” (Gerken 2010, 6) but the most powerful role it plays in this issue is in setting up theoretical federal supremacy while empowering local political actors. The United States Constitution declares that between state and federal law, the latter takes precedence, as recently affirmed by the United States v. Arizona (2012) Supreme Court case. Despite the supremacy clause, federalism in fact gives states relative autonomy, especially in the case of marriage equality, on which states were left to decide individually before the Obergefell decision. For example, in May 2012, North Carolina approved Amendment One to the state constitution, stipulating that the only valid marriage is between one man and one woman, which Obergefell now calls into question (Perry 2014, 376).

Read More

Case Study: Obergefell V. Hodges

478 Words | 2 Pages

Obergefell v Hodges first originated when same-sex couples sued the state governments of Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee in disagreement to the constitutionality of those states ' bans on same-sex marriage and refusal to recognize any legal marriages that took place outside the jurisdiction of the state. The couples argued the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was violated by the state 's’ exclusion of same-sex marriages. In the trial courts of the fourth, seventh, ninth, and tenth districts, state level bans on same-sex marriage were declared

Read More

Fifth Amendment Vs Doma Research Paper

169 Words | 1 Pages

: Per KENNEDY. In a 5-4 opinion the court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Justice Kennedy stated “DOMA seeks to injure the very class New York seeks to protect. DOMA violates basic due process and equal protection principles applicable to the Federal Government. The Constitution’s guarantee of equality must at the very least mean that a bare congressional desire to harm a politically unpopular group cannot justify disparate treatment of that group.”

Read More

What Is The Purpose Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

804 Words | 4 Pages

This couldn't have been made any clearer. All powers not expressly given to the government (and those necessary for it to carry out its duties) rest in the hands of the states and the people. What the Supreme Court has done today is over step its boundaries and directly violate the tenth amendment to the Constitution. Nowhere in the Constitution is federal government given the power to dictate the terms and legality of marriage, yet that is exactly what they have done by forcing the legality of gay marriage in all states, and forcing all states to recognize the validity of gay marriage. This was a decision that should have rested in the hands of the states and the people to decide for themselves, but instead the supreme court decided to completely ignore the tenth amendment and deliver its own ruling, which is as good as law.

Read More

Tenth Amendment Interpretation

1195 Words | 5 Pages

I am studying the tenth amendment and my interpretation of this amendment is that it is stating what rights the state's/government has over the people. The tenth amendment was incorporated into the constitution because the states and their citizens feared that the federal government would leave them with no power. The Tenth Amendment was added to the United States Constitution on December 15, 1791. This amendment was proposed by congress in 1989. The tenth amendment didn’t exactly confirm the amount of power given to the government and the state's’/citizens.

Read More

What Are The Arguments Against The Principles Of The Declaration Of Independence

472 Words | 2 Pages

For instance, when the federal government ruled that gay marriage is a lawful act, it secured the rights for people who didn’t have them beforehand, although there is a percentage of citizens who don’t agree with this practice, whether it be for religious reasons or otherwise. The solution? Our country has states for a reason, and during Colonial times, each state ran itself according to their beliefs. Consequently, if you disagree with your state’s belief on a certain issue, you have the ability to relocate to another that shares your values. Unfortunately, although there are some practices that differ between states, such as legalization of marijuana, not all laws are equal.

Read More

Why Drinking Age Should Be Lowered

1434 Words | 6 Pages

Why the drinking age should be lowered In my last essay, I talked about the drinking age and if it should be lowered raised or kept the same. By the time, I finished doing the essay I concluded that it should be lowered. I think it should be lowered because at 18 your considered an adult and your able to get married join the army and vote. The earlier the drinking age the better because keeping it at 21 will increase the desire for the forbidden fruit, and when teens turn the legal age they will drink heavy. Also 21 being the legal age of maturity is absurd because somebody turning 21 doesn’t mean that they are mature enough to consume alcohol in a responsible way.

Read More

Uniform Rule Of Naturalization

108 Words | 1 Pages

Practically for more than 100 years, our U.S. federal government has remained prominent in the issue of immigration policy. Having this been said, congress and the Supreme Court have issued restricted space to states to adjust and control the existence of the immigrants that are inhabiting within their borders. The United States constitution rarely states anything about immigration when majority of Americans presumes it does. In Article I, Section 8, admits to Congress the authority "to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization. " The power that congress has is to execute laws ruling on how immigrants can obtain citizenship, an authority that should normally go through the national government.

Read More

Essay On The Tenth Amendment

942 Words | 4 Pages

The purpose and history of the tenth Amendment is to “define the establishment and division of power between the Federal government and state governments” (Moussa, 2007). The tenth Amendment has also defended such rules regarding these entities. The reason for this amendment was to use it to describe the federal regulations, government police power, and taxing power from the federal government. At one time, it was perused essentially, on the off chance that it is not in the constitution, the national government would not be able to pass it to any states. Over time progressed, government force has extended throughout the Supreme Court.

Read More

My Five Wives And Transgender Parents: Film Analysis

655 Words | 3 Pages

Much to demise of LGBT and liberal activists, DOMA’s goal to “defend” one-man, one-woman marriage and tend to undermine groups that try to end such judgmental laws. I believe everyone should get to love and a share their life with anyone they please and that who we to judge someone else’s preferences due to narrow-minded thinking. Also DOMA points that every child should have a mom and a dad, however in modern society families are being changed to where a child might have same-sex parents, trans-gender parents, or intersex parents. Hence, for federal group state such a statement is not only judgement but

Read More

Mill Utilitarianism

1072 Words | 5 Pages

Alas, in America laws are not applied to only the directly affected, but to a whole, governed body. That leaves the issue of whether homosexual marriage should be recognized as a federal or state issue. Republicans demand that according to the 10th amendment -the federal government’s power is dictated only by what is in the Constitution, all other power is given to the people and the states- it is a state’s right to recognize or nullify a marriage. If one wished to continue to read past the 10th amendment, they would inevitably skim the 14th, which limits the state’s power to not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” or ” deprive any person of life, liberty, or property”. To deny a person a lawfully protected marriage is to breach the clearly recorded rights preserved by the 14th amendment.

Read More

The Importance Of Equal Rights In The United States

330 Words | 2 Pages

The Founding Fathers created the United States by the underlying idea of Christian values, and looking at it in retrospect, these fundamentals guided our nation to the position it is in today However we are a constantly changing time, and what might have guided our ancestors before does not mean we must follow it too. In the 21st century alone there has been many changes in marriage laws, abortion, and many other controversial topics. As a result of the time period, it is necessary for the separation of church and state in order to properly govern our nation according to the Constitution and to allow equal rights to all citizens. In June of 2015, the ruling on gay marriage was announced by the Supreme Court, confirming to all that same sex

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: The Power Of Gay Marriage In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document