ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: The Power Of Gay Marriage In The United States

1101 Words5 Pages

The Federal government does not show much interest in the people, in reality all they seek is building a government in which things operate better than they have before. States are responsible for making sure that their people get what they want. It is clear that when it came down to gay marriage, state government should've been the one to make the decision of officially making it a law instead of the federal government. In my opinion when it comes to gay marriage, state government should have the power. The fact is that the federal government should put their opinion, however the state should have the last say and decide whether if they think it should be made a law or not. Especially when it came to gay marriage, federal government didn’t …show more content…

Not to mention “The tenth amendment gives specific powers to the federal government's, unfortunately anything it doesn't say is left up to the states.” Although it gave them the power to pass laws throughout the 50 states. This particular power should not be granted to them when they already have other things to worry about. Gay marriage is a very delicate topic which should be handled by someone closer to them who knows how they feel, something they don't have much connection to because they don't hold the same relation states do with people. It is said “Any power not listed, says the Tenth Amendment, is left to the states or the people.” Although the Tenth Amendment does not specify what these specific power may be, “the U.S Supreme Court has ruled that laws affecting family relations (Such as marriage, divorce, and adoption), commerce that occurs within a state’s own borders.”But we have to stop and think the founding fathers created a system they thought would work, however they never took in consideration things such as gay marriage was going to come. Saying that “ There are a lot of powers the constitution doesn't say anything about, one being marriage. Founding Fathers gave the Federal Government the right to pass laws throughout the whole 50 states. However the

Show More
Related

Case Study: Obergefell Vs. Hodges

1334 Words | 6 Pages

The case looks to the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause to determine whether same-sex couples have the right to marry, and whether the right to same-sex marriage is a fundamental right. The case was decided and the judges ruled in a 5-4 majority that it is Unconstitutional for states to deny same-sex couples the right to marry, or to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages that were performed out-of-state. Justices that voted in favor of the decision are Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. The dissenting Justices are Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and

Read More

14th Amendment Pros And Cons

444 Words | 2 Pages

The tenth amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. ”(US Constitution). In other words, it says that any power that the government does not have, is given to the state. For example, states determine rules for marriages, DMV, voting, states taxes, and educational funding.

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Bowers V. Hardwick (1986)

682 Words | 3 Pages

Rule: The Supreme Court mandated in favor of the state of Georgia; Homosexual sexual activities were ruled to be neither “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” or “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.” (pp. 506) Despite what the Court of Appeals found, no previous cases of the Court had supported that the Constitution allowed for an expansion of privacy towards homosexual sodomy. In fact, homosexual acts were criminal acts under the common law, and were prohibited in the laws that were established in the thirteen states during the approval of the Bill of Rights. Homosexual sodomy was also illegal under the laws in almost all states, excluding five, around the time the Fourteenth Amendment was signed, and in 1961 in all fifty states.

Read More

Al. V. Hodges Supreme Court Case Study

2162 Words | 9 Pages

In the majority opinion written on the Obergefell et al. v. Hodges Supreme Court case on June 26, 2015, the court decided that states were required to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples as well as recognize such licenses from other states on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision held wide ramifications for policy implementation throughout the nation, especially in those states that had not already legalized same-sex marriage. This unilateral action by the federal government created a complicated responsibility for state and local governments to integrate the broad new legal proceedings effectively. The problems that arise in the local governments following such federal decisions challenge the nation’s federalist system,

Read More

Case Study: Obergefell V. Hodges

478 Words | 2 Pages

The dissenting opinion included: Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito. Roberts took a strict-constructionist approach and stated that the Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction because same-sex marriage was not explicitly stated in the constitution. He stated that although same-sex marriage may be a good policy it is not the Supreme Court’s duty to make that decision. He held that the right to same-sex marriage should be given to the states rather than the national government. The constitution protected the right to marriage and requires states to implement these laws equally but the Supreme Court should not engage in judicial policy making.

Read More

Full Faith And Credit Clause Analysis

835 Words | 4 Pages

Although marriage and civil unions should be recognized under the Full Faith and Credit Clause it was not because this clause was primarily used for judicial rulings and was not thought to apply to marriages or civil union licenses. This deals with the recognition of same sex marriages in states, it also deals with the relationship between states. At the time some states such as New York recognized same-sex civil marriages but whether these unions were recognized in other states was an entirely different story. This went on for a while until it was determined that DOMA was not only discriminatory but also went against the Full Faith and Credit

Read More

Fifth Amendment Vs Doma Research Paper

169 Words | 1 Pages

: Per KENNEDY. In a 5-4 opinion the court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Justice Kennedy stated “DOMA seeks to injure the very class New York seeks to protect. DOMA violates basic due process and equal protection principles applicable to the Federal Government. The Constitution’s guarantee of equality must at the very least mean that a bare congressional desire to harm a politically unpopular group cannot justify disparate treatment of that group.”

Read More

What Is The Purpose Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

804 Words | 4 Pages

This couldn't have been made any clearer. All powers not expressly given to the government (and those necessary for it to carry out its duties) rest in the hands of the states and the people. What the Supreme Court has done today is over step its boundaries and directly violate the tenth amendment to the Constitution. Nowhere in the Constitution is federal government given the power to dictate the terms and legality of marriage, yet that is exactly what they have done by forcing the legality of gay marriage in all states, and forcing all states to recognize the validity of gay marriage. This was a decision that should have rested in the hands of the states and the people to decide for themselves, but instead the supreme court decided to completely ignore the tenth amendment and deliver its own ruling, which is as good as law.

Read More

Why Did The Confederate States Really Cause The Civil War?

644 Words | 3 Pages

The tenth amendment gives that power to the states and the people.

Read More

Tenth Amendment Interpretation

1195 Words | 5 Pages

I am studying the tenth amendment and my interpretation of this amendment is that it is stating what rights the state's/government has over the people. The tenth amendment was incorporated into the constitution because the states and their citizens feared that the federal government would leave them with no power. The Tenth Amendment was added to the United States Constitution on December 15, 1791. This amendment was proposed by congress in 1989. The tenth amendment didn’t exactly confirm the amount of power given to the government and the state's’/citizens.

Read More

Era Of Cooperative Federalism

1810 Words | 8 Pages

But, as with its Commerce Clause jurisprudence, the Court’s expansive rights jurisprudence may not be taken for granted. Consider the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges case, which legalized same-sex marriage in all states. That decision, undeniably, was an audacious assertion of power by the Supreme Court, one that brought the guillotine down on states’ internal deliberations as to the merits of same-sex marriage. I thus cannot deny that this decision counts in favor of the view that the Court holds a bias toward centralization, but there is another side to this coin, namely, the four impassioned dissenting opinions delivered by the Court. The principal dissent among these decried the Court for “invalidat[ing] the marriage laws of more than half the States” without their assent.

Read More

What Are The Arguments Against The Principles Of The Declaration Of Independence

472 Words | 2 Pages

For instance, when the federal government ruled that gay marriage is a lawful act, it secured the rights for people who didn’t have them beforehand, although there is a percentage of citizens who don’t agree with this practice, whether it be for religious reasons or otherwise. The solution? Our country has states for a reason, and during Colonial times, each state ran itself according to their beliefs. Consequently, if you disagree with your state’s belief on a certain issue, you have the ability to relocate to another that shares your values. Unfortunately, although there are some practices that differ between states, such as legalization of marijuana, not all laws are equal.

Read More

Why Drinking Age Should Be Lowered

1434 Words | 6 Pages

Why the drinking age should be lowered In my last essay, I talked about the drinking age and if it should be lowered raised or kept the same. By the time, I finished doing the essay I concluded that it should be lowered. I think it should be lowered because at 18 your considered an adult and your able to get married join the army and vote. The earlier the drinking age the better because keeping it at 21 will increase the desire for the forbidden fruit, and when teens turn the legal age they will drink heavy. Also 21 being the legal age of maturity is absurd because somebody turning 21 doesn’t mean that they are mature enough to consume alcohol in a responsible way.

Read More

Uniform Rule Of Naturalization

108 Words | 1 Pages

Practically for more than 100 years, our U.S. federal government has remained prominent in the issue of immigration policy. Having this been said, congress and the Supreme Court have issued restricted space to states to adjust and control the existence of the immigrants that are inhabiting within their borders. The United States constitution rarely states anything about immigration when majority of Americans presumes it does. In Article I, Section 8, admits to Congress the authority "to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization. " The power that congress has is to execute laws ruling on how immigrants can obtain citizenship, an authority that should normally go through the national government.

Read More

Essay On The Tenth Amendment

942 Words | 4 Pages

The purpose and history of the tenth Amendment is to “define the establishment and division of power between the Federal government and state governments” (Moussa, 2007). The tenth Amendment has also defended such rules regarding these entities. The reason for this amendment was to use it to describe the federal regulations, government police power, and taxing power from the federal government. At one time, it was perused essentially, on the off chance that it is not in the constitution, the national government would not be able to pass it to any states. Over time progressed, government force has extended throughout the Supreme Court.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: The Power Of Gay Marriage In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document