ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: The Ratification Of The Constitution

953 Words4 Pages

I am but a humble farmer from rural Virginia and I do not wish to spout ideas and sling political jargon as the bankers and lawyers of the North do about the state of our constitution. Instead I am making my appeal to the people of this new nation, imploring them to think about the good of the whole country rather than just the large cities. It is my belief that limited government is the best government. But I will also recognize that our current government clearly needs more power after the rebellion of the Massachusetts farmer, Daniel Shays. With that being said, after the formation of the constitution I am implored to bring some of the issues it contains to light. If the ratification of the constitution is to occur, the framers must consider an addition of a Bill of Rights, reconsider the means of representation for the citizens, and reassess the power given to the federal government. …show more content…

We need to guarantee the basic rights of the citizens of this country. These rights would not limit the rights of the people, but set a base line of what they are already guaranteed. With the broad powers that are being proposed for the federal government, individuals need protection of their rights. The Federalist will argue that a Bill of Rights would be redundant and therefore unnecessary, because of the powers of the government will be limited and specifically assigned. They think since there will be no power assigned to the government that could restrict the liberty of the press, that no restriction could occur. There was no power given to parliament to tax the citizens of the United State of America, but that did not stop them from enforcing them. There can be no moving forward with a constitution without a Bill of Rights. The powers of individual state and liberties of the people must be

Show More
Related
886 Words | 4 Pages

Due to money shortage, farmers from Massachusetts were unable to pay their taxes and debts, thus, leading to a rebellion by Daniel Shay. The farmers then attacked the nation's arsenal. As a result, congress realized they were too weak to stop them and they were shocked into calling a convention where they would later make a new constitution. Naturally, the idea of a new constitution sparked a clash of ideas between the anti-federalists and federalists with a debate on whether or not this new constitution should be ratified. Though, I believe, the people of the United States should not ratify the Constitution because it gives the opportunity and time for the president to seize power and establish tyranny over our beloved country.

Read More
1522 Words | 7 Pages

Here enters the idea of amendments. These flaws threatened but also aided the readiness for democracy in the United States. The constitution still allowed slavery, it founded what we now know as the electoral college, protects the president from popular majority, gave state legislatures more power, gave congress more power than any other democratic colony, and didn’t limit the judicial branch. Now when they created this constitution, they didn’t realize at the time that some problems would come with it, but in realty, these flaws help make the constitution stronger. As problems arise within certain aspects of the constitution, the farmers made it so that amendments could be made in order to fix whatever needed fixing.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

Read More
269 Words | 2 Pages

They Did It ! Recently a decision was made that will change America forever. On August 18th Tennessee became the 36th state to ratify the 19th amendment, therefore granting women the right to vote in all states. This decision with certainly be met with both support and opposition from many.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

Angela Davis Once said “Well for one, The 13th Amendment to the constitution of the U.S. which abolished slavery, did not abolish slavery for those convicted of a crime.” Although the amendment was desperately needed it made more problems for the U.S.The thirteenth amendment was about abolishing slavery. Many people had different opinions about this amendment. The amendment affected our nation dramatically. The 13th amendment to the United States Constitution says that, "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Read More
229 Words | 1 Pages

Us federalists believe that the Constitution is fine as is. The constitution does not need a Bill of Rights that will only limit the rights of people rather than protect them. We believe the constitution is required in order to safeguard the liberty and independence that the American Revolution gave us. Many influential figures also take our side in this situation such as George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, as well as James Madison. To go along with many of this nation’s leader supporting our point of view there are also many others that feel the same way.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Right now a debate is occurring about whether not we should ratify the Constitution. This is an important moment in our country's history because this is the moment where we could unify and become a government or we could disapprove of the Constitution and have troubles between the country. The Articles of Confederation were not very credible because it gave the states too much power; which were too weak. The debts were not getting payed and the country was in great trouble. The Constitution would let the power will lie with the wealthy men, and not give the power to the states to raise money to pay off debt; the country will still remain in debt if we ratify the Constitution.

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

Lastly, the legislation declared that fugitive slaves "escaping into any state or territory of the United States may be lawfully reclaimed and conveyed to the person claiming his or her labor or service", and that even if in the free territories, "slavery and involuntary slavery in the punishment of crimes" was permitted. While the compromise seemed to address the issue, it only went on to slowdown the war that was soon to come. Although the agreement incorporated in the Missouri Compromise maintained the balance of slave and non-slave states in the territories added to the Union in The Louisiana Purchase, the issue over slavery's expansion into new territories arose again following the Mexican War. The question of whether new territories

Read More
297 Words | 2 Pages

Facts Amendment 2 was added to Colorado’s Sate constitution by a statewide referendum it prohibited the state or local government from adopting measures that protect homosexuals as a class from discrimination. Richard Evans, a homosexual works for Denver Mayor brought a law suit against Romer the Governor of Colorado State on the grounds that Amendment 2 was unconstitutional. Issue Does Amendment 2 of Colorado’s State constitution discriminate against homosexual orientation?

Read More
1893 Words | 8 Pages

Every year 88,000 deaths are attributed to excessive alcohol use or alcohol related events; alcoholism is the third leading lifestyle related cause of death in the United States (“Facts About Alcohol”). During the early twentieth century, there were many overlying problems that the United States government, or braches of the government, had to deal with. The United States government had to deal with problems such as child labor, alcohol, women wanting rights, corruption, and then reform. These were some of the major issues in which people in government positions had to deal with and find a solution for. Faced with the problem of an increase in the number of people incarcerated and overcrowded prisons as well as an increase in domestic abuse and criminal activity, the Judiciary Committee in the House of Representatives chose to ratify the

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

The Bill of Rights contains many different freedoms granted to us as citizens. WIthout them, our nation wouldn’t be what it is today. The idea of freedom shows in our actions throughout our own history and in the history of the world as we try to help others gain a freedom. Since not all people of our country believe in the violence of wars, many try to achieve what they’re fighting for with civil acts of protesting or disobedience. This means that people are fighting for something they believe in by disobeying the things they do not agree with while possibly breaking laws at the same time.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

The Civil War The Civil War was the deadliest war in American history with over 600000 American deaths reported. This war was fought to keep the Confederate States from leaving the Union. The Union won because they had a telegraph system and had more resources. The effect of the Union victory has had a large impact on society.

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

As Americans, the first amendment gives us the right to change things that we believe are wrong. This gives American citizens power to make an impact. There are many controversial topics in our country, things such as gun control and immigration. These controversies cause the citizens of America to speak out about their view on the issue. We have the right to petition, and to protest peacefully, but does this really make an impact on our government’s decisions?

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

The Second Amendment protects the right of people to keep and bear arms. This amendment was a controversial among different people in the government. It was between letting the people keep their weapons or to not let the people keep their weapons. This amendment was important to the framers of the Constitution because it provided the country with a well-regulated militia. The Second Amendment states "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

The First Amendment outlines free speech as the right to speak, write, and share ideas and opinions without facing punishment from the government. Without the Constitution, Americans wouldn’t have basic rights and their actions and decisions would be controlled, stressing the importance of free speech. Therefore, the limitations on free speech should be no more than that said in the First Amendment as further restrictions would eliminate the foundations of human rights and freedoms in a democracy, lower one’s knowledge of their individualism, and would ultimately suppress a peaceful society. Free speech may be discussed in a multitude of ways, both positive and negative. However, the idea of limiting such freedoms is either or.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: The Ratification Of The Constitution

Open Document