Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons 4th amendment
Pros and cons 4th amendment
Pros and cons 4th amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons 4th amendment
Pros and cons 4th amendment
Pros and cons 4th amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons 4th amendment
Depending on the context, search warrants are a controversy for example; when entering a residence with the correct procedures that the law enforcement officer makes. To get a warrant, officers need consent and signed paper from the judge and with the state attorney. Overall there is the fourth amendment that safeguards the protection of the people and the right to issue a warrant with probable cause. In nature, there are certain requirements of a search warrant and some denies that right to search freely.
In our world there are many crimes and cases where the government must search a home to find evidence or seize items. But, what happens when the government begins to ignore an amendment and break the trust of people. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Fourth amendment). The fourth amendment was created to protect the people from the government incase they wanted to invade people’s privacy and so the government doesn’t go too far in their searches for
Prabhakar Pillai, author or “Pros and Cons of Censorship”, states “It [censorship] prevents the public display of disrespect to any particular individual or community.” Racism, sexism, and other forms of hates towards a group of people wouldn’t be all over the internet. Cyberbullying could be diminished. Geoff Yang then goes on to say, “We need censorship to keep the dimly lit corners of cyberspace safe.” Nowadays, simply voicing your opinion, or even not owning up to society’s idea of “perfect”, can result in cyberbullying.
And not only that but led to a major increase in school shootings in the Last 10 years. Because people will say anything online because they feel there isn’t major consequences as there would be in real reality not online they can get away with leaving hate
The whole point of the Fourth Amendment is not to completely stop the police, because the amendment can be waived if an officer has a warrant, or a person’s consent. The Fourth Amendment states that generally a search or seizure is illegal unless there is a warrant, or special circumstances. Technically stating that a citizen is protected by the Fourth Amendment, until a government employee gets a warrant, and then they can invade a citizen’s privacy. Also people state that the FISA Court’s warrants are constitutional, but the NSA’s surveillance is unconstitutional. Even though people do not like the NSA’s surveillance, the NSA is legal because the FISA Court that the people did not mind makes it legal.
The fourth amendment can be beneficial but, it can also to some U.S. citizens be invasion of privacy. The fourth amendment states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” some U.S. citizens believe that Law Enforcement, the Government and the NSA are violating the required guidelines of the Fourth Amendment. The NSA is conducted a mass U.S. surveillance not to believe specific individuals may be engaging in terrorist activity, but instead to believe all of us may be engaging in such activity. The government mass surveillance proves that U.S. citizens are considered suspects at all times. With the Patriot Act the NSA has access to
Now, in 2015, with new technology people can make fun of people and bully them online without having to look at them. They do this because they know that they have to right to speak
The idea of the U.S. government monitoring internet content has created multiple different arguments and stances over the years. The government has a duty and a right to monitor our internet content to a certain extent. They can use this information to stop acts of terrorism, robberies, murders, etc. They can also use this information to piece together crimes or anything that would need to be further explained or understood. Yet, this can sometimes be taken too far.
When asking people about the NSA and if what they do is correct, most people will jump at you and say that what they are doing is wrong. They will tell you that spying on someone’s text messages and phone calls is a violation of their privacy and freedom. Little do people know that this small amount of freedom the NSA is intruding upon is actually for their own safety. Therefore, the quote by H.L. Mencken, that “The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe,” is incorrect.
“The NSA is not listening to Americans ' phone calls or monitoring their emails” (Does the Government). As the government states they are permitted to collect any Americans communications The Fourth Amendment protects your privacy, for instance the police cannot search personal properties. Due to the definition of "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,” it makes people feel secure (Legal Information). In addition, it prevents all irrelevant searches that are not useful.
You might have recently heard or read on the news about what is going on between Apple and the FBI. If not I will try to explain it as best I can. So a while ago there were two terrorist in San Bernardino, California. They attacked a center that helped developmentally disabled people, after this they were on the run for about four hours before police found them and killed them in a shootout. So with both of them dead police had very little to go on to figure out why they would do what they did.
Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.
The NSA has access to personal emails, text messages, and can intervene and listen to phone calls made from and received on a personal device. There should not be a limit to how far a government agent can dig and search when probable cause is placed on an individual. Nation security is the number one priority and citizens should stand behind the government. (“How the…”) Domestic surveillance programs are not limited to just the NSA.
but I believe the NSA has been taking things much too far. The NSA has been purposely intruding SMS, texts, calls, and almost anything that is considered over the web interaction. Not only is this causing problems for people right here at home but is also making enemies overseas. A great example of this is the NSA spying scandal in Germany. On July 10th 2014 as told by several news site including my citing of NBC news [1] that Germany demanded that the top U.S. intelligence official leave immediately over spying allegations.
Is technology bad for us? Who knew that technology usage can lead to memory problems? Since browsing through social media is very common nowadays, the brains are bombarded with electronic information. From instant messaging to blogs, it is easy to forget some things. Over the years, the debate about whether or not technology has a positive, or negative impact on society gets talked about on many sites and social media platforms.