ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of US Government Monitoring Internet Content

525 Words3 Pages

The idea of the U.S. government monitoring internet content has created multiple different arguments and stances over the years. The government has a duty and a right to monitor our internet content to a certain extent. They can use this information to stop acts of terrorism, robberies, murders, etc. They can also use this information to piece together crimes or anything that would need to be further explained or understood. Yet, this can sometimes be taken too far. When they start to monitor everything a citizen does on the daily, it can be argued as an invasion of their privacy and their rights. Not everything a person does or says should monitored for a certain official to know. The government needs to do all they can to use the content …show more content…

How can something be argued right or wrong when their are so many different sides to it. The duty of our government is to keep America and its citizens safe, but how are you ensuring their safety when you are infringing upon their rights? Yet, how can you keep them safe if you don't use every resource you can to stop what would be harming them or to punish the one who caused the harm? The fact that the government has the duty to use its resources to protect us is not up for debate. They can and must use internet content to their advantage if it means that someone will be stopped from doing what they shouldn't be. They have to upstand their vow to protect us in every way they can, and monitoring internet content is just one of many ways of dong that. The cyber security act is just one of many ways that they do that. This helps them solve things like murders by using recent search histories or phone calls that could link someone to a crime of this sort. It allows them to monitor threats and actions that shouldn't be made or done. By using this they have been able to stopped planned terrorist attacks that could have been tremendously harmful to our country and fellow

Show More
Related

The Pros And Cons Of The USA Patriot Act

1518 Words | 7 Pages

In response, the United States implemented the USA Patriot Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by providing appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act), significantly impacting homeland security within the country. The act introduced surveillance measures, such as monitoring communication networks like telephones and texts, to gather data and identify suspicious activity. Additionally, it allowed for the scrutiny of business records and financial transactions, aiding authorities in investigating potential terrorist acts and funding sources. According to statistics from the Pew Research Center, 42% of the public viewed the Patriot Act as a necessary tool to combat terrorism, while 34% believed it went too far and posed a threat to civil liberties. These differing perspectives reflect an ongoing debate regarding the act's impact on national security and civil liberties.

Read More

How Did 9/11 Changed America

879 Words | 4 Pages

In other words, they are collecting a lot of data from our phone conversations, emails, and social networking communications every single day. As the article states, it says that when Congress passed the Patriot Act, it expanded federal officials’ powers to keep tabs on most of our personal information. Not only are they intercepting emails, but they are also tracking credit card use, cell phone call, and car travel. This may seem a bit invasive, but a survey shows that about ⅔ of Americans are willing to put up with the personal impositions in order to prevent

Read More

Does The NSA Stick To The Statue Quo?

1277 Words | 6 Pages

The U.S follows a different school of surveillance. Despite the fundamental right to be held “innocent until proven guilty”, it monitors everyone until proven innocent. The status quo could of course damage America’s long known liberties granted by the Constitution. Recent revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, have confirmed that the government is more likely to cross some constitutional lines in the name of national security. “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) regulates the government’s acquisition of any electronic surveillance within the country for foreign intelligence use.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The NSA Scandal

952 Words | 4 Pages

The other side of this argument is that mass surveillance is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. This is what Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy had to say on the matter. “’Americans deserve to understand more about the NSA's collection and use of their phone records, and in particular about the types of systemic problems revealed in these documents,’”(Risen 4). In a similar way according to Risen “the American public remains wary of the threat of terrorism but is also critical of government surveillance programs put in place”, and that “majority of Americans ‘oppose mass surveillance of people's Internet and phone usage for use in future investigations. ’“(Risen 6).

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act

598 Words | 3 Pages

They claim that by ending phone record surveillance it is the start to successfully ending surveillance abuses by the government. They rightfully point out that the Act violates the privacy of millions of people by letting the government collect phone records and much more without any reason or evidence of a crime. This surveillance on everyone is not only unconstitutional, but also doesn't make us safer. Even though the government claims that the program has stopped terrorist attacks, these have been repeatedly disproven. Even the White House's own Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board has found no evidence that the program has made a difference in counterterrorism efforts. "

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act

741 Words | 3 Pages

The Patriot Act is a combination of laws that were present in the 1970’s and 1980’s. Law enforcement has been able to use electronic surveillance long before the Patriot Act was signed. However, the Patriot Act allows law enforcement to use more surveillance against crimes of terror. Whether it is the use of cameras, cellular devices or wiretaps, surveillance simply means to watch over someone or

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act

866 Words | 4 Pages

The Patriot Act allows investigators to use the tools that were already available to investigate organized crime and drug trafficking. George W. Bush decided to create and push the Patriot Act as a way of protection for the people just 45 days after the attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11. Bush placed this act in hopes that he would be able to prevent any types of terrorist or unsafe act from happening again. Today, people are quick to disagree with this idea due to the idea that they are being watched constantly. Although it is understandable, knowing that privacy is not considered when it comes to our personal lives, the government is just monitoring us to keep us protected.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Fourth Amendment

794 Words | 4 Pages

"Internet privacy has recently been a hotly debated issue. If the government does not have probable cause or a warrant to monitor internet activity, then they are not permitted to do so. I base this off of the Fourth Amendment: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ” Making this claim, I believe that the Patriot Act, the National Security Agency’s surveillance, and practices like these are illegal.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Surveillance Of The NSA

694 Words | 3 Pages

Whether these actions are considered constitutional though, are much a matter of opinion. According to the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, one is entitled to the right of not enduring an unreasonable search and seizure without a warrant. Some may say that the monitoring of internet activity violates this amendment due to the fact that there is no warrant needed, and we aren't exactly sure of when the monitoring is occuring. But of course, this is up to interpretation. It is also hard to say that can something is unconstitutional when it has been going on for a significant period of time, and the actions have been approved by congress.

Read More

Controversy: Should The Government Monitorin Search Engines

507 Words | 3 Pages

The government has both implied powers and elicit powers. I believe that the so called “duty” to monitor internet content falls into the realm of elicit powers, and I do frankly believe that it is the governments duty of monitor said content. Many people find it outrageous that government agencies could be in a way “spying” on them on them, but the way I think about it with the great deal of terrorism and all around violence that takes place in today’s day and age, a little browsing privacy is worth the safety that such monitoring provides. As you think about the way certain search engines also record data on your searches/web activity it becomes clear that your seemingly “private” searches are not so private, not to the government or even to search engines. The only difference between the government use of

Read More

Fourth Amendment Research Paper

515 Words | 3 Pages

I believe that they are violating our rights by tracking us digitally. If their reason is to track terrorist threats, it’s a bit ironic to do that since we are taking oil from the Middle East, which is a country full of terrorism. The National Security Agency can access everything we do online and monitor text messages that we send. They collect every single thing we do digitally to track any terrorist threats.

Read More

Persuasive Essay On The Patriot Act

792 Words | 4 Pages

The government is unlawfully invading the privacy of the American people. Bills and surveillance programs have been set in place to spy on the American people which is an invasion of privacy. Shortly after 9/11 the government passed a bill that was to help protect Americans from any further terrorists attacks. That bill was the Patriot Act short for “Providing Appropriate Tools Required to intercept and obstruct Terrorism Act”, this was the first of many bills passed which gave the U.S government freedom to use tools of surveillance to spy on Americans. The government then had the authority to monitor the actions of any Americans such as their phone and email communications, bank and credit records, and internet activity.

Read More

The NSA: Is The Fourth Amendment Being Ignored?

2097 Words | 9 Pages

The supporters of the NSA surveillance program provide reasons that are blatantly unconstitutional, excusing the program as a small interference for the greater good of the citizen; however, the idea of relinquishing constitutional rights for the sake of national security is in itself a violation of the Fourth Amendment. The motivation for creation of the Fourth Amendment was the use of the ‘excuse’ of providing national security by suppressing and harassing citizens. The Constitution is an unconditional document; therefore, the NSA surveillance program is not justifiable through ambiguousness. Regarding the NSA surveillance program, there is no defined balance between security and liberty. Liberty is mutually exclusive from government interference in the context of security.

Read More

Why Is The Bill Of Rights Important

796 Words | 4 Pages

I think that the government should have very little jurisdiction to monitor people’s behavior on the internet. People should indefinitely be innocent until proven guilty. Getting even further into the matter, local government should have little to no say in what people put online. The local government is in charge of rent, safety and zoning. The local government should not be interested in what people choose to have online, unless the person is

Read More

Preamble Of The Constitution Essay

501 Words | 3 Pages

In order to determine the extent to which the U.S. government has the duty to monitor internet content, it is imperative to first understand that this is a complex issue. With complex issues, there is never a simple answer that is purely black or white. The answer lies in a grey area where the government must protect the safety and well being of its constituents while also guaranteeing their right to privacy. The Preamble of the Constitution outlines the goals that the founding fathers had for the United States, which are still very relevant to contemporary issues of the United States.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of US Government Monitoring Internet Content

Related Topics

Open Document