Arguments Against Euthanasia And Assisted Suicide

864 Words4 Pages

Euthanasia is often divided in two different ways. In the European countries Luxembourg, Netherland and Belgium, the law says that assisted suicide is legal; while in the American states Washington, Oregon and Montana they have a law that says legalized suicide. The different between these two laws is that in the European countries, the doctor injects poison to the patient’s body, but in America, they can only give him or her a prescription for the pills and give the person the pills, but the doctor cannot help him or her taking the pills, it’s the patients own decision to take the pill them self.

Should it be legalized everywhere?
There are many different opinions about euthanasia and if it should be legalized. If Euthanasia gets legalized …show more content…

But this claim would be similar to saying that laws against selling contaminated food are government-mandated starvation.
Laws against euthanasia and assisted suicide are in place to prevent abuse and to protect people from unscrupulous doctors and others. They are not, and never have been, intended to make anyone suffer.” - “Rita Marker, JD, Executive Director
Kathi Hamlon, Policy Analyst
International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
"Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Frequently Asked Questions," www.internationaltaskforce.org
Jan. 2010”

The discussion whether assisted suicide should be legal or not isn’t only about people and the governments opinion, it is about history. It is also about cultural history and history in the laws. Washington was the first state in USA to legalize assisted suicide, but they have a long history that says suicide is illegal. To assist a suicide, whether it is a doctor who assists or someone else, use to be seen as a …show more content…

Why does someone choose to end his or her life by assisted suicide?
Brittany Maynard is a woman who has been a lot in media the last few months for her choice to end her life by taking pills she got prescription on, with the meaning to die from it. She was suffering from a cancer tumor in her brain called Glioblastoma. When she found out about the tumor, it was already on 4 stages and inoperable, the doctors told her she had only 6 months left to live. Maynard did a lot of research on her disease to look up her options for treatment and what the chance of surviving this was. The optional treatment wasn’t anything she wanted and the chance of surviving wasn’t high.
"They didn't seem to make sense for me," she said, because of "the level of side effects I would suffer and it wouldn't save my life. I've been told pretty much no matter what, I'm going to die – and treatments would extend my life but affect the quality pretty negatively."
- Brittany Maynard tell the Magazine