ipl-logo

Arguments Against Juvenile Offenders

1690 Words7 Pages

Violent crimes are being committed in the United States every day. The majority of them are being committed by teenagers from the ages 12 through 17 years old. Juveniles should be given a light sentence up to 4 years or a second chance depending on what they have committed. We need to realize that our children are our future, and they are throwing their lives away.
A juvenile offender may not have a clear understanding of the crime they have committed. A teen’s brain is not fully developed and their sense of right and wrong is much different than an adult’s. The juvenile could be lacking a strong guardian present in their life, causing them to act out. Their actions could be a cry for help, punishing the child let’s their parents off the …show more content…

The fact of the matter is that it is not always the teenager’s fault for the poor choices and actions; they are merely a victim of their environment of their parents. Trialing these teen’s as adults unjust and unfair, there other alternatives that our society can turn to, to help our community a better place to live. Growing up in America today can be a very traumatic experience facing many pressures and trails. Juvenile offenders should not be trialed as adults because they will suffer physically and will have psychological damage while incarcerated with adults. Murderers, Rapist and other criminals are being released from jail every day after serving only a short and lenient sentence, these murders and rapist are adults and these juveniles are thirteen years old and spend twenty-five years in jail. Who are these criminals and why are they so …show more content…

Antisocial behavior which can be broken down into different types of behavior. The presence of antisocial behavior for instance aggressiveness and disobedient behavior, the lack of prosocial behavioral. Prosocial is a behavioral that demonstrates cooperative, truthful, and caring children. Behavioral such as these can be really alter a child’s behavior. Most children show signs of some antisocial behavior during their development, and different children demonstrate different levels of prosocial and antisocial behavior. Some children, may manifest extreme level of both antisocial and prosocial behavior; for example, a very loving but hostile child. Some children can experience low level of both types of behaviors. Extreme level of antisocial behavior is considered a mental illness. Young children may show extreme antagonism towards authoritative figures, and he diagnosed with oppositional defiant

Show More
Related
743 Words | 3 Pages

Some might agree that, “The juvenile justice system is failing to protect citizens from the surge in violent crimes committed by juveniles. What is needed is a system that protects society from violent juvenile offenders, and efficiently rehabilitates juveniles." (G Garcett) The threat of this harsher punishment will result in lowered juvenile crime rates. Juveniles should be convicted as adults for violent crimes because it is not fair for juveniles to commit big crimes and get away with it so easily.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

It is well known that teenagers are generally reckless and incompetent. When it comes to violent crimes, when should a teenager be tried as an adult? When a person turns eighteen, they are considered an adult and face the same responsibilities and consequences. They must be able to make their own decisions. Minors accused of violent crimes should not be tried and sentenced as adults due to their childlike behavior and instead should be remanded in juvenile hall until they reach the age of eighteen.

Read More
1955 Words | 8 Pages

In 1993 10-year-olds Jon Vensibaals and Robert Thomsan beat a 2-year-old to death then put his dead body on the railroad tracks to cover the crime committed. Even though they were just children when they committed this awful crime, they knew what they did was wrong. So the question then is, “if they knew what they were doing was wrong, and planned to murder someone, should they be tried as adults for the crime or as juveniles?” The juvenile criminal system was designed to reform and rehabilitate juveniles in their best interest, depending on the crime. On the other hand, the adult criminal system punishes the adult for crimes.

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

These individuals are surrounded and being influenced by men or women who have done heinous crimes, nowhere near the kind of help they need to improve their violent life. Considering discussions in class, we read that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan stated that, “Mandatory life without parole for a juvenile precludes consideration of [his or her age and doesn’t help with maturity and learn from the consequences]”. This represents that from a higher vision, giving these juveniles life without parole won’t enhance their lives for the better. Letting them undergo being tried as an adult could restrict them from the opportunity of an education or job as well. From this discouraging discovery, “it makes sense that young people who go through the adult system are 34 percent more likely than those in the juvenile system to be re-arrested”.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Juvenile Justice is a common subject that most people find interesting and to find out what juveniles have committed at such a young age is alarming to some people. Even though they should learn from their mistakes the Supreme Court shouldn’t abolish the mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murder because of the research on the teenage brain, the age difference and the culture . First, the Supreme Court shouldn’t abolish the mandatory life sentences for juveniles who commit murder is because of the research on the teenage brain is just research but that still doesn’t defy the fact that they’ve done something wrong with or without intentions of doing it. “Teenagers are pre-programmed for sensation-seeking, which leads to crime, then it means that they are less responsible and blameworthy.”

Read More
2269 Words | 10 Pages

It’s hard to decide whether juveniles are mature enough to be considered adults. So when evaluating how juveniles should be punished, some base their understanding on studies of the juvenile brain and argue that juveniles are far too naive and cannot take responsibility for their actions. Meanwhile, others argue that juveniles can understand their actions and can take responsibility, even though they may seem underdeveloped. When determining if juveniles should be considered adults for crimes they commit, it becomes too nuanced for all cases to be summed up under one side. Instead, many look to focus on other reasons that juveniles should not be considered adults for the serious crimes they commit.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout American history, anyone who has committed a crime has the right to a trial by jury. However, in recent years, youths have become a major issue in the legal justice system. The problem is that youths are being tried as adults instead of juveniles, regardless of their age. The practice of charging youths and adults have drastically increased throughout the years which is costing states a lot of money and this method has lots of inadequacies for youths to learn from their mistakes and from committing another crime. Even though juveniles, who commit heinous crimes, should be tried for their wrongdoing, they should not be charged as adults and they should receive different treatments than adults.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

We have seen today in society of how crime rates have been rampant and how statistics show that most of the crimes were being made by minors. I believe that when most of them look at the bottom of these young offenders come disproportionately from impoverished single-parent homes that are located in the neighbourhoods desinvertido and have high rates of learning disabilities, mental health, and substance abuse and problems with the help of the system of juvenile justice that can make a great return on a successful transition to adulthood. Their ages ranged from 20 and under, most are under fifteen years of age. Juveniles tried as adults must assume the same consequences as any other criminal and are subject to state prisons with inmates much higher and that have probably committed crimes much more tortuous then you could ever have. These minors between the ages of nine to twenty according to the offence committed or of the number of times that are prosecuted and believe that it is immutable.

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

When teen felons choose to act without thinking, they are putting other people’s lives at risk. They need to be charged as adults because the victims of the crimes will not be given the justice they deserve when they have to worry about that criminal harming them again. Although some people think that sending a juvenile through adult court gives them no hope, they should have given this a little thought before committing the crime. Teens need to think about the consequences and how their actions affect others before they act. When choosing between putting a violent adolescent in prison and taking the chance of letting them commit that crime again, it is most suitable to let the teen be tried as an adult and to place them in prison.

Read More
636 Words | 3 Pages

Where is the justice in a system that allows juveniles to be made into victims of heinous crimes while not providing these children with necessary rehabilitation? Adult prisons are terrible environments for rehabilitation of juvenile criminals. Juveniles are at high risk for sexual abuse and suicide in prison. “Congressional findings in the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 posited that juveniles were five times as likely to be sexually assaulted in adult rather than in juvenile facilities - often within their first 48 hours of incarceration.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

Juveniles should be convicted as adults for violent crimes because it is not fair for juveniles to commit big crimes and get away with it so easily. If they want to act like adults, they should be treated. Some teens commit crimes and don't have a really good excuse on why they do it. In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” by Jennifer Jenkins she explains how the teenager that killed her sister, husband and her unborn child excuse of killing them was that he just wanted to “see what it would feel like to shoot someone”, which is no good excuse for what he did to this family. Another example from Jennifer's Jenkins article she states how “undeveloped brain” has nothing to do with teens committing these crimes.

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

The Juvenile Act sought to increase the accountability of violent juvenile offenders and even mentioned that the penalties imposed by the juvenile offenders in a more punitive manner resembling the adult court system. Many state legislatures had already responded “punitively to the youth violence epidemic of the mid- 1980s to mid- 1990s, and all but six states either expanded or implemented laws that the sought to increase the number of juvenile offenders waived to adult criminal court.” The Juvenile Act merely represents the federal codification of this trend, enshrining a national shift from a rehabilitative focus on juvenile crime to a new retributive focus on the treatment of violent juvenile offenders in American courts and legislatures.

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

Juvenile Justice Should juveniles get treated as adults that’s one of the biggest controversy in our nation now days, with many juveniles committing crimes that are inconceivable according to their age. Judges have the last word on how to treat this young people. Many people argue that “the teens that are under eighteen are only kids, they won’t count them as young adults, not until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager this people are to call them adults” (Lundstrom 87). This is why people can’t come to a decision as how these young people should be treated like.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

Can you imagine waking up behind closed walls and bars? Waking up to see your inmate who is a 45-year-old bank robber and you are a 14-year-old minor who made a big mistake. This is why minors who have committed crimes should not be treated the same as adults. Some reasons are because the consequences given to minors in adult court would impact a minor’s life in a negative way. If a minor is tried through a juvenile court, they have a greater chance of rehabilitation.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Teenagers are not perfect, and their irrational behavior can lead to poor decisions that could potentially be dangerous and unlawful. A debate has now occurred for many years that deals with the issue of sentencing teens that have committed serious crimes such as murder and robbery. Many people argue that if juveniles commit these crimes that their punishment should be equal to an adults punishment for serious crimes, but juveniles shouldn’t have to worry about their lives getting ruined. Most juveniles and teenagers do not have enough maturity to survive in the adult prison system, and recent brain development research shows us that teenagers brains are not even close to being finished developing. Therefore, teenagers and youth under the age of eighteen should

Read More

More about Arguments Against Juvenile Offenders

Related Topics

Open Document