ipl-logo

Arguments Against Police Body Cameras

448 Words2 Pages

After the police brutality attacks that have become quite popular and common within the United States, the affirmative action, requiring all police to wear body cameras, see that this procedure will alleviate and hopefully eliminate all counts of police brutality. These body cameras will be instituted to protect both parties since “the arguments in favor of police body-cams are simple. The videos would offer an accurate and unbiased record of exactly what occurred in each officer’s shift,” (Klabin, 2015). In order to protect our citizens, police officers have been entrusted with the immense responsibility of having the authority to use force within certain circumstances. But we are not being protected. Cops kill an American citizen every eight …show more content…

The number of attacks are only rising as police use their authority to their advantage and take their given use of force for granted. This push for body cameras reflects on the criticism that there is not enough oversight of police departments (Vega, 2015). In North Charleston, South Carolina, a police officer accused of killing a man named Walter Scott was only charged with murder after a video shot by a civilian (not an officer) of the incident surfaced. This raises my question, Who is guarding our guardians? Many officers have reported a testimony, proven to be false after video evidence surfaced. Without the videos proving a victim to be innocent, these police would be walking among us as killers, disguised as our protectors. When officers and citizens are aware that their behavior is being monitored, both parties have an immediate tendency to behave accordingly. “The results of this study suggest that this increase in self awareness leads to more positive outcomes in police-citizen interaction,” (Wile, 2015). The government is losing money by not subjecting police to wear body cameras. Police misconduct expenditure costs $1.8 billion annually, while the cost to supply police with body cameras across the nation only ranges up to $20

Show More
Related
1034 Words | 5 Pages

Body Cameras on Police Officers There are pro and cons to police officers wearing body cameras. In light of all the recent killings caused by the law, concern of the safety of both the authority figures and the public have caused the issue of there being a mandatory law that officers should have to wear body cameras at all time and make sure they are turned on whenever they are to interact with the public. Most recently there has been a plethora of killings of unarmed young minorities just for the simple reasoning that they looked "suspicious" or "they seemed like they were up to no good". The reason many states would like to put the law that every officer should be mandated to wear body cameras into place will be for the purpose of being able to record any interaction that an officer has with a person of the public.

Read More
91 Words | 1 Pages

Even though the use of body cams may deter police officers from abusing the law, body cameras also have the ability to keep them safe as well, for the body cameras in Maryland, for example, has kept people from being hostile and breaking the law excessively (“5 ways body-worn cameras have helped police officers, “ 2014). I feel that if people could remain civil as officers continue to do their jobs, the majority would have the ability to live a safe and productive life with their families in the foreseeing

Read More
287 Words | 2 Pages

Police and body cameras 2.) Body cameras 3.) Police accountability 4.) Wearable devices in police work 5.) Police misconduct 6.)

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

Speech Outline Title: Body Cameras I. Introduction Attention-getter: Body cameras were used because of Michael Brown’s death and police misconduct. B. Significance Body cameras may increase police accountability and protect them from accusations. C. Credibility: My interest in this topic is due to the latest deadly encounters with police officers and improving the communities’ safety.

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

So many lives could be saved and so many police officers’ careers could be saved through the utilization of this idea and the reaping of its benefits. Whether it captures a citizen attack on a police officer or whether it captures a case of police brutality, the great possibilities outweigh the potential cons of police body cameras and make them a risk worth taking. Whether one takes the side of the citizens and believe the police are typically irrational or one takes the side of the police and believe they are only doing their jobs to the best of their ability, the incorporation of body cameras to the controversial police force would be extremely beneficial for

Read More
1729 Words | 7 Pages

Law Enforcement Officers via the wearing of body worn cameras can help protect people’s constitutional rights, it will help lower police misconduct, and it will promote public trust. In the recent years there has been many debates surrounding the use of body cameras by law enforcement officials. The utilization of body worn cameras would be a grea idea and an excellent resource to document law enforcement daily activities. Though a lot of people believe that the use of body worn cameras may be an invasion of their privacy (4th Amendment right), law enforcement should be able to use the technology of wearing body cameras because it will give the public a perspective of what law enforcement deal with on a daily basis. Body cameras will play an important role by provided evidence in court, protecting the public and also protecting the law enforcement officers.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Police Brutality is a huge problem in America today, and few steps are being taken to prevent this justice. There are numerous cases where a police officer’s motives are put into question, leading to public unrest due to controversy. Whether it is racial, simple hate, or if the police officer is simply unstable, there is an easy way to bring justice to this problem. Body cameras have been employed in various cities and states already, and have proven to be effective in reducing police brutality. Body cameras are on the verge of changing policing as we know it.

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

The continuous cycle of racial discrimination, police use of force and brutality among the police officers and the black individuals has directed to the improvement of methods meant to stop racism. These methods decisions of body worn cameras and policy training are not only to provide equality towards actions between the citizens and officers, but furthermore assistances the officers to carefully improve the interaction within another individual of color. Body worn cameras and policy training have shown to be a positive aspect to further equality, but to also stop the lost lives leading to this moment. Policy Critique and Implications

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

There have been many complaints about if body cameras on police officers will work or not. There are two people that have different opinions that other people that think body cameras will stop police brutality against police officers. William N. Grigg, and Joshua Krause these people think body cameras on police officers will not work, and will not stop or decrease the violence from police officers. Grigg’s argument is Their arguments are that the officers from the SDPD forgot to turn on their body cameras while on duty. A crime that happened in April, Officer Neal Browder fatally shot a 31-year-old man named Fridoon Zalbeg Rawshannehad, who had been suspected of carrying a knife.

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

In addition, more than 90 percent of complaints against police officers fell compared with the previous year. “This is a promising tool for police officers, which is likely to be a game changer not only for the professionalization of policing, but in terms of police-public relations,” (Dr. Barak Ariel, 2014) The researchers of Institute of Criminology did an experiment on nearly 1,000 police officers on duty. Group A was given a body camera that was worn on a shirt pocket that captured the POV (point of view) of the officer. Group B was the control group where they got no cameras. This experiment was to see if the officers used force in any of their shifts.

Read More
1487 Words | 6 Pages

From interactions on the street to testifying in open court, an officer’s word is everything. Once that credibility is gone it is almost impossible for that officer to continue in a law enforcement capacity. Body cameras have emerged as a potential solution to the evolving discussion around police trust and legitimacy issues. One benefit of having a body camera is that if a critical incident, officer involved shooting, or accusation of brutality arises, the camera will provide footage from the officer’s point of view that

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

A major benefit for having body cams is the fact that it will decrease the force used by Police Officers. For the past couple of years there has been many videos of Police Officers using excessive force against innocent victims, especially with African Americans. “The notion has been around for a while. But since August 's fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri -- for which witness accounts varied widely -- it 's gained traction to become part of the national conversation about police conduct.” (Brandon Griggs 1)

Read More
1684 Words | 7 Pages

With more police department requiring police officers to use body cameras, there has been an improvement with police performance with the community. Police use of force has always been a controversial topic and concern with the community. The fact policing exercising their power to maintain peace, justified or unjustified, could potentially ruin their reputation and trust in the public. A solution to address this issue is requiring police officers to use body cameras as they are able to review the video to correctly determine if the action is proportionate to the situation.

Read More
1157 Words | 5 Pages

Cameras main job is to record, cameras see what we can’t, let us play over a video. But when you put then on police officers many good things come out of it. Putting body cameras on police officers and help the police department and the community. According to Junior Scholastic Police officers that used body cameras used 66% less amount of force than officers who did not try on the cameras. Police supervisors also got 88% less complaints about police officers that wear body cams than police officers that did not wear body cams.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

The use of previous videos can be detrimental to new cops because it can teach them how to deal with many different situations correctly that way they don’t put their career in jeopardy or the lives of their partners in danger. Everyone knows that there is always three sides to a story: what one individual says happens, what the other individual says happened, and what happened. With the execution of body-worn cameras, it would eliminate, the reduction seen in complaints filed and sustained against officers and videos can reduce the need for lengthy

Read More

More about Arguments Against Police Body Cameras

Related Topics

Open Document