Arguments Against The Boston Tea Party By Samuel Adams

359 Words2 Pages
The colonists opposed the writs of assistance because it invaded their property and their privacy, and they opposed the vice- admiralty courts because it didn’t give them their right to a jury. Because it didn’t actually represent them even though the British said otherwise. The repeated boycotts and protests eventually took a toll on British merchants and they told Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act, which they eventually did. He became a public figure in Boston after the British Empire’s victory in the French and Indian war. Samuel Adams argued against the Stamp/Sugar because Parliament didn’t represent the colonists in government. He also took a leading role in the Boston Tea Party, which backfired after Parliament passed the Coercive Acts.