ipl-logo

Arrested Development Pros And Cons

478 Words2 Pages

In most situations you can find comedy, but can you artificially insert it into a very real and very situation that’s happening in the real world? How does it change the real life events it’s representing? That’s what we should be asking ourselves as we discuss the 2003 American sitcom Arrested Development. The show follows the fictitious Bluth family, who is both rich and very dysfunctional. The plot is kicked off when the patriarch of the family George Bluth gets arrested for fraud and embezzlement, as well as under investigation for "light treason". George’s middle son Michael Bluth must then take care of his large and out-of-control family, and keep them out of the spotlight until the whole situation is under wraps. Arrested Development in terms of the political and international relations realm is best known for it’s extensive satire of the Bush administration. In 2003, America led an invasion of Iraq that overthrew the government of Saddam Hussain. America claimed that Hussein was amassing weapons of mass destruction. Because America believes …show more content…

The prosecutor using what he believes to be the Patriot Act, invokes the 2001 law to seize Bluth family records, which include a photo believed to show conclusive evidence of WMD in Iraq. Turns out the photo didn’t show any weapons or Iraqi desert. It was nothing more than a close-up shot of something a slight bit more inappropriate. While the situation of Iraq and Saddam Hussein were played for laughs in this show, Arrested Development did portray the panic of WMD in the early 2000’s very accurately. The photo found, while in the moment just a singularity and not conclusive to evidence, reached the highest levels of the executive branch and of the military. The Pentagon is shown to be panicked, and the image is shown all over the

Open Document