ipl-logo

Assess The Reasons For The Breakdown Of The Personal Rule

1220 Words5 Pages

Essay - Breakdown of the Personal Rule – Assess the reasons for the breakdown of the personal rule.
Charles’ personal rule was successful in the way that Charles managed to sustain himself and the country for eleven years. However, the enforcement of Laudianism on the Scottish people and the outbreak of war between the Scottish and the English ultimately led to the breakdown of the Personal Rule. Charles was out of touch with his people and lacked the right support and funding he needed to successfully win against the Scots. The failure of the Short Parliament worsened his situation and by arresting opposition, Charles alienated the people whose support he needed.
Charles was out of touch with his people as well as with the Scots. His enforcement …show more content…

Ship money is a clear example of this and, despite managing to collect nine-tenths of what he asked for, after a few years many people refused to pay ship money. Such is seen in the case of John Hampden who refused to pay. The decrease in the revenue of ship money, which started off at £190,000 a year to …. A year, made it difficult for Charles to raise enough money in order to prepare for war against the Scots. Furthermore, City of London’s refusal to loan more than …. To Charles made it even harder for Charles to sustain himself and his people as well as get ready for war, as he could not meet this level of expenditure on prerogative taxation. The breakdown of the personal rule was due to Charles inability to get enough money. As seen with the City of London, it is clear that Charles was just not getting the right amount of money he needed due to people not trusting him to pay them back afterwards. The refusal of people lending him money led to the calling of the Short Parliament and therefore the breakdown of the personal rule. Furthermore, the Short Parliament’s refusal to grant the King subsidies before England’s grievances were tended to, led to the arrest of nobility by Charles, who in reality needed their support. Without the loans, Charles could not pay for the Bishop’s War, leading to its failure. Moreover, the dissolution of Parliament made Parliament only more determined to address grievances when it was to be undoubtedly called again. This process was sped up with the Treaty of Ripon, putting Charles in a situation where calling a Parliament was necessary as he was now being asked to pay £850 a day. Charles’ financial situation, as well as his inability to keep the nobility supportive of him, contributed to the breakdown of the personal

Show More
Related
755 Words | 4 Pages

On the British side there were disloyal subjects preparing for rebellion while some of the Americans claimed there were victims. William Pitt, as their leader, the Bostonians believed he would continue to defend the British and his threats were Grenville and Rockingham. Likewise, Pitt resolved bad grain harvest crisis soon after taking office, he became frightened and frustrated in December 1766 and retreated to Bath where he remained for the next two years. At this critical moment, Chancellor of the Exchequer Charles Townshend in 1767 stepped into power and became approved by the Parliament of Great Britain, which composed of three major components which were tax on lead, paint, glass, and tea from other countries. The second was the establishment of the American Board Commissionaires and the third was the punishment of the New York legislature for the failure to fill all of the requirements of the Quartering Act.

Read More
129 Words | 1 Pages

Financial stability of the colonial people was often thought to be put at stake with the introduction of new taxes and regulations which caused much frustration. Before Parliament had laid out any questionable taxes (i.e. stamp act), the citizens appeared perfectly content with Parliament 's power (Doc C). The stamp act required that every document, used by the colonists be stamped and taxed. One can see why this would anger people (as paper was the “big thing” before modern technology). Chaos ensued, the colonists were not fond of tax collectors whatsoever.

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

The Seven Years’ War had been seriously costly. The national debt was so much by 1764. Gladly to pay the taxes, it was said that they should pay it since the taxes were being imposed by Parliament to make up the money that was spent on war. However, there is something that Parliament had overlooked. They overlooked the fact that the colonists gave a large amount of

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

‘Henry VII successfully established his royal authority by 1487’ I think that royal authority means that the king would have had an heir to carry on his line and his opposition has been dealt with to a suitable extent. By 1487, Henry had spent two years on the throne after defeating Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth, and within those years, I believe that Henry VII had successfully established his royal authority by 1487. However, there are arguments that suggest Henry did not successfully establish his royal authority by 1487.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

However, this new attempt to raise "ship money" was not passed by parliament, but by King Charles I, where this breach of contract was

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

After this approach did not work he changed his tactics towards more covert methods of unification. By adapting his methods, it is clear that James was able to react to situations, making him an effective leader. Whilst true unification did not occur under James’s reign, his actions in regards to this still improved relations slightly. There were many factors which were both cohesive and divergent.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

Rather, Oates was fined 2,000 marks, stripped of his clerical habit, sentenced to life imprisonment, whipped through the streets of London five days in a year for the rest of his life and pilloried four times in a year. During the reign of King Charles, Protestantism was the religion upheld by the monarchy and it was also at this time that the Church of England was restored as the national church after Cromwell’s Puritan protectorate had ended. Prior to this period, a faction existed between the Protestants and the Catholics. Catholics were perceived to be a threat to the English throne and the state and so during this period, any narratives regarding the Catholics will readily raise the prejudices of the people. Oates, who was in a terribly bad light with his ill-reputation and poor financial condition had to gain the interests of the people and propel himself back to society.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

The British Parliament’s first actions that could be considered to set the stage for punitive measures is the Declaratory Act that was debated and enacted in conjunction with the repeal of the Stamp Act. The resistance to the Stamp Act was widespread and had the members of Parliament concerned with whether it was treason or the beginnings of rebellion against the empire. The decreased trade that resulted from boycotts of English goods in part contributed to a depression affecting English merchants. As a result, the new leader of the Parliament Rockingham was faced with a situation where Parliament felt it needed to assert its authority over the Colonies while finding a way to repeal the Stamp Act to reestablish the flow of trade. The resultant

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

The end result were cries for those in control to” be hung with new made Ropes” (Frederick 4.2). As a result of these events, Samuel Adams argued that “England… had become a morass of sin and corruption” (Brinkley 97). This disdain for England had now taken root. Were it not specifically for the monetary policies of those in power, the tax base and governmental intervention required to enforce its collection, this event would not have taken

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

At the conclusion of the French and Indian wars the British government was in debt for having to finance such an expensive war, and felt that since the war took place in the colonies and for their defense the colonists should pay the debit in the form of taxes. This is a perfectly reasonable argument on their part however what parliament failed to do was give the colony a say in the matter, and did not take into account that the restrictions, and taxes sugar, molasses, and paper aka the Townsend acts they implemented would make making a profit in the colonels virtually impossible, and violated the colonist’s Natural rights. Some of the great thinkers of the time believed that the government had a moral obligation to treat its citizens fairly,

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

The British government was not looking for the best of the people. They were only thinking about what they wanted; the government was not interested in what the people wanted so they decided to make decisions on their own, which resulted in changes that form the United States today. Because of this, they were justified in rebelling and declaring independence. One reason why the colonists decided to rebel and declare independence was because of taxation.

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

Your Honor and the ladies and gentlemen of the Jury of the Court of Justice, throughout this case it has been well established that the defendant in question, Charles I, is not only guilty of exercising absolute, arbitrary power over his subjects in the United Kingdom, but also for establishing and enforcing laws that undermined the good of the people. Though the defense might argue that Charles I was a remarkable leader heavily influenced by religion, he actually ruled over England as a tyrant. Charles I thought he was superior to Parliament and his subjects, and disregarded the law with utmost disrespect. Though he believed in the Divine Right of Kings philosophy, that he was put on this earth to serve God’s will, this does not excuse Charles’ actions of imposing unjust taxes when he became in need of additional financial funds. His taxation for ship money was outrageous, and only furthered his own strength and power.

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

Primary source study: James I and his reciprocal duties towards his subjects Throughout the reign of James I in the 17th century he has been depicted as a king who has oppressed his subjects. In the work True Law of Free Monarchies James I displays the relationship between the subjects and himself. He distinguishes a hierarchy within his nation discussing that the monarch has many obligations to support the greater good of the people. With these responsibilities the people also have certain duties that reciprocate.

Read More
1274 Words | 6 Pages

For an utopian society to exist, there needs to be a merging of conformity and individualism in the society. Pure individualism or pure conformity in a society leads to a lopsided and corrupted society; they need to exist in synchrony. In Merry Mount, the people follow an ideology of complete freedom of thought and of individualism. The Puritan’s society shows what happens when everyone conforms and no one expresses their individual beliefs. When the ideologies of conformity and individualism merge it combines into a greater society as a whole, better than either of the individual half’s.

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

Shanti Gurung History 101 Final Exam Professor Montague 12/06/2015 1. As some 16th and 17th c. leaders sought to strengthen their control over both the legislative and administrative machinery of their respective kingdoms, others witnessed the destruction of absolutism as their principle governing philosophy. What obstacles did English royalty face in their effort to establish an absolute monarchy in the early decades of the 17th century? (Hint: Remember the tactics monarchs employed to achieve absolutism.)

Read More

More about Assess The Reasons For The Breakdown Of The Personal Rule

Related Topics

Open Document