ipl-logo

Who Is Charles I A Tyrant

673 Words3 Pages

Your Honor and the ladies and gentlemen of the Jury of the Court of Justice, throughout this case it has been well established that the defendant in question, Charles I, is not only guilty of exercising absolute, arbitrary power over his subjects in the United Kingdom, but also for establishing and enforcing laws that undermined the good of the people. Though the defense might argue that Charles I was a remarkable leader heavily influenced by religion, he actually ruled over England as a tyrant. Charles I thought he was superior to Parliament and his subjects, and disregarded the law with utmost disrespect. Though he believed in the Divine Right of Kings philosophy, that he was put on this earth to serve God’s will, this does not excuse Charles’ actions of imposing unjust taxes when he became in need of additional financial funds. His taxation for ship money was outrageous, and only furthered his own strength and power. …show more content…

Members of the jury, you are essentially deciding the future of England. Will it be run under a constitution or absolutism? Do you believe it is possible that someone could be above the law? That they do not have to pay for their actions? That they are special because their actions have no repercussions? These proposals do not exist in the world since there is a well-established principle in society saying that everyone is accountable for their actions, so Charles I cannot be an exception. After thorough questioning of the defendant, taking into account his responses proves that Charles I is without questionable doubt guilty of the accused crimes. Please set aside the arguments raised by the defense today, which are inferior to those of the prosecution. At the conclusion of the case, we ask that the just ladies and gentlemen of the jury produce a verdict of guilty for the people of the United Kingdom. Thank

Show More
Related
422 Words | 2 Pages

1. Nathaniel Bacon was a wealthy Cambridge educated English aristocrat who arrived in Virginia in 1674 after a scandal in England. His family sent him to Virginia where he received a substantial land grant and a seat on the council by his cousin by marriage Governor Sir William Berkeley. Bacon became angry when Berkeley refused him a commission to lead a campaign against the Indians.

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

Although she ended up spending months in jail, the arguments against her conviction on the legal terms of a change in jury member were not only heard out, but accepted, resulting in her freedom. (122). Although she faced unideal consequences under the law, as the jail time and fear of execution were certainly detrimental, they were far less severe than those that would have been expected. Compared to other women accused in other areas, Disborough’s legal consequences were notably light. She did, however, face more harsh consequences from her peers and fellow citizens.

Read More
1586 Words | 7 Pages

In 1884, the Métis people sought help from Louis Riel to help them grab the attention of the Canadian government who had been ignoring their complaints and petitions, and treating them as lower class citizens. They needed Riel to be the effective voice to speak on their behalf in order to obtain rights to elections and such so that their land was not threatened by immigrants from the east due to past experiences. After attempting to fight the Battle of Batoche, he was accused of high treason, and a five-day trial was held of which Riel had pleaded guilty and was then sentenced to death. The trial of Louis Riel suffered many imperfections and did not contain the number of merits as one would have thought. Riel was deprived of justice and mercy

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

On the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.

Read More
658 Words | 3 Pages

He was extremely ardent in his religious studies. He possessed an elitist outlook about himself, and this outlook led him to believe that he was elected for salvation. His main goal was to “reform the national church from within” (165). However, when Charles I, a king who was sympathetic to Roman Catholicism, ascended to the throne, he knew that he could never openly

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The Magna Carta was a legal document of rights and privileges signed in 1215 by the barons of England. The Magna Carta was created to limit the power of the monarch, to make sure that the monarch would not abuse their power and to make sure the people in the kingdom had fair rights. The King of England at the time, King John, was forced to sign this document by angry barons because he did not want to have to limit his power and give everyone written rights. Also, the King knew that if he did not sign the document he was at risk of creating a civil war. The Magna Carta has greatly influenced our Bill of Rights by producing no excessive fines or punishments and protection of property To start off, the Magna Carta influenced our Bill of Rights by creating no excessive fines or punishments.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

Whenever law ends, tyranny begins (John locke). In our government laws are made by a group of people who meet and develop solutions for problems. They get the approval of different people in charge, and the words becomes law. But what happens when there is no president elected by the people, and instead a family that passes the power generation to generation, thinking only what is best for them and only them, as they know no better. That moments is when things turn bad and problems start to appear, here and there, everywhere.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

To what extent do the sources support the view that Charles’ personal rule was eleven years of tyranny. [30] Source A and Source B undoubtedly supports the view that the personal rule was tyrannical. Unlike Source C which is not in specific reference to the personal rule and does not agree with the statement, Source D refers to both the positives and negatives of the source but ultimately prove the personal rule was tyrannical. The view that personal rule was tyrannical is supported greatly by source A. Pym’s speech at the Short Parliament voiced the opinions of Parliament that had been festering since it was dissolved 1629.

Read More
1389 Words | 6 Pages

Once when a baron abandoned his nephew and a dispute broke out, King Louis avoided war tactics in order to prevent the poor from becoming even more overburdened and “out of love for justice and his compassion for the churches and the poor” Louis eventually settled the quarrel in court in a merciful manner (Suger 110). In Suger’s judgement, Louis’ acts of nonviolence in order to retain peace for the churches and poor are appropriate decisions, but he reveals that

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

There will always be a biased jury, or inconclusive evidence to support that a crime, like that of Tom Robinson’s, to kill a human being. We will be taking an in depth look at the faults of this

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

One of the most important benefits, however, is the reduced risk of a compromise verdict. The overall benefit of majority verdicts suit the circumstances for all but the commonwealth laws. (Knox 2002) “When a lone ratbag juror can abort a trial, the time-honoured idea of the unanimous verdict starts to look decidedly unsound.” In the book ‘Secrets of the Jury Room’ Knox broadcasts the ideals of jurors acting selflessly and complains about rogue jurors messing up a trial.

Read More
384 Words | 2 Pages

December 31st 1648, our king, King Charles I is being put on trial tomorrow. People around my town are accusing him of being a tyrant and traitor, worst of all an enemy to the commonwealth of England. I myself have no opinion in his trail and will not speak my opinion to any living being. All I really I am one of the one hundred and thirty-five judges attending the king’s trail. I have heard that many judges may not show, in fear of being associated with the trail.

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

In the middle of the 12th century, King Henry II had a friend and trusted confidante in the person of Thomas Becker. In late 1170, Henry II’s words would incite four knights to murder Becket. In this paper, we will examine the proposition that Becket deliberately pursued a policy that led to his murder to advance his cause. Becket was the son of a London merchant, by training an accountant, who rose to become the Archbishop of Canterbury. Becket had worked for his cousin who was a banker.

Read More
1534 Words | 7 Pages

What would you do if you were to be given great authority and power? There are those who would be responsible and treat such power with the utmost care, and yet there are those who would use their authority for personal gain as if it were a child ’s play toy. Corruption is everywhere; there is no limitation to where or when it can happen. One of the most notable examples of the abuse of power, and the catastrophe that can occur from the aftermath is during the Elizabethan era in England.

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

Read More

More about Who Is Charles I A Tyrant

Related Topics

Open Document